Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Burley to Seahawks for 6th round pick (merge)


Recommended Posts

Per Colts twitter.  I feel like some people here are not going to like this.  Personally, I think anytime you can take a fringe roster player you got for nothing and turn him into a draft pick, that's ok with me.  What are your thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I didn't realize this was being discussed in the 53 man roster thread.

 

Yeah it got some attention in the other thread, but I think this is worthy of its own thread.

 

And while I like Burley and thought he'd make it over Purifoy, I think getting a 6th for him is a good deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy will probably be a star.

Nick Burley...His name even has a better ring to it now that he is a part of that Seahawks secondary. Good that the Colts got a draft pick out of it but If the Hawks saw something they liked there my bet is that they probably end up getting the better side of this deal down the road.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine with this..

I just hope Sheldon Price is gone for good now

 

why is that?  I hope Price makes the PS again.  I thought it seemed like he played well in the preseason with the exception of the one TD given in the Bengals game.

 

btw, anyone else notice how the story on NFL.com makes it sound like the colts acquired Burley from the seahawks for a 6th round pick? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Burley was the better cover man but not by enough to compensate for what Purifoy brought to our return game.

This would be my assessment too and I don't think it was that close on coverage Burely was clearly better right now.   Purifoy has huge upside on D just raw and could play S too. When it came to special teams play Purifoy was miles ahead even if he isn't the PR.

 

Burley will end up being a good CB Purifoy could be special it was a risk but can't keep them both. No way either made it back to the PS  and we look good at CB with Davis Toler Butler and Gordy. 

 

Well played Grig's that 6th could help us move up to grab someone next year. I just like the idea of having more draft picks finally than we are supposed to that's the way to build and Grig's has an eye for late round talent or so it would appear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it got some attention in the other thread, but I think this is worthy of its own thread.

 

And while I like Burley and thought he'd make it over Purifoy, I think getting a 6th for him is a good deal.

 

 

Don't forget that Burley had a year n NFL practice squads and the other guy is a rookie when you compare their cover skills. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why is that? I hope Price makes the PS again. I thought it seemed like he played well in the preseason with the exception of the one TD given in the Bengals game.

btw, anyone else notice how the story on NFL.com makes it sound like the colts acquired Burley from the seahawks for a 6th round pick? lol

price is horrible.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it got some attention in the other thread, but I think this is worthy of its own thread.

 

And while I like Burley and thought he'd make it over Purifoy, I think getting a 6th for him is a good deal.

While hardly a blockbuster, it's a very interesting trade.  You probably can't negotiate an outright 6th in trade unless you are completely committed to keeping him, and you probably can't let him go unless you like Purifoy as well or better.  

 

Part of me thinks you keep a player worth a 6th before he ever plays, and part of me is ecstatic to have the pick for a player that likely is just a journeyman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you can back that up with any kind of reasoning at all then I will give exactly 0 credence to your opinion.  but thanks for playin  :thmup:

I shake my head at adjectives used that seem to be thrown out to describe players and their abilities. Anything less than what a fan wants is deemed as "sucks" or "horrible. 

 

A horrible player could be considered the guy who couldn't make it into the college game....or perhaps the guy who couldn't make it to the NFL.....but any player who makes an NFL roster, is beyond sucking or horrible IMO. It's like saying Andy Dalton sucks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do I have a weird feeling we are going to regret this trade later?

Cause he's gone on to play for the BEST defense in the NFL now

But when you're feeling down about this, just remember......... Kelvin Sheppard is no longer a Colt :thmup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

While hardly a blockbuster, it's a very interesting trade.  You probably can't negotiate an outright 6th in trade unless you are completely committed to keeping him, and you probably can't let him go unless you like Purifoy as well or better.  

 

Part of me thinks you keep a player worth a 6th before he ever plays, and part of me is ecstatic to have the pick for a player that likely is just a journeyman.

 

I had convinced myself that Burley is a rookie. He's technically not. He was a practice squad guy for the Jags last year. No real game experience, but there's a little bit of book on him so far.

 

Someone else mentioned that Purifoy is two years younger, and his scouting reports are more impressive than Burley's, which suggests he has more upside and potential.

 

Roster management made it necessary to choose between the two. If it were purely based on how they played in preseason, I think Burley is the guy. But when you consider all the different variables, I can understand having a higher projection on Purifoy. And if you assume that this trade means the Seahawks wanted Burley, not Purifoy, then the decision becomes pretty simple. Even if they had been committed to keeping him, and they did like him better than Purifoy, straight up, that conversation with the Seahawks changes the dynamic. Especially since, even though Burley was better, he wasn't head and shoulders better, and he was never used as a returner.

 

I'd like to know exactly how this trade came to be. Who initiated, what other players were discussed, etc. That's part of the reason why, even though I think Hard Knocks is an intrusion, I'd love for the Colts to do it. This would have been a great year to get some behind the scenes details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the concern some here have with the trade is that the Seahawks have a solid recent history of taking lightly regarded, not highly drafted players and turning them into very good cornerbacks.

 

Sherman and Browner are just two.   I'm not sure they've spent a high round pick on a corner since Carroll got there.

 

But that hasn't prevented Seattle from getting great corner play.

 

So,  losing Burley may not seem like a loss today.....    but it might a year from today.

 

Just sayin.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had convinced myself that Burley is a rookie. He's technically not. He was a practice squad guy for the Jags last year. No real game experience, but there's a little bit of book on him so far.

 

Someone else mentioned that Purifoy is two years younger, and his scouting reports are more impressive than Burley's, which suggests he has more upside and potential.

 

Roster management made it necessary to choose between the two. If it were purely based on how they played in preseason, I think Burley is the guy. But when you consider all the different variables, I can understand having a higher projection on Purifoy. And if you assume that this trade means the Seahawks wanted Burley, not Purifoy, then the decision becomes pretty simple. Even if they had been committed to keeping him, and they did like him better than Purifoy, straight up, that conversation with the Seahawks changes the dynamic. Especially since, even though Burley was better, he wasn't head and shoulders better, and he was never used as a returner.

 

I'd like to know exactly how this trade came to be. Who initiated, what other players were discussed, etc. That's part of the reason why, even though I think Hard Knocks is an intrusion, I'd love for the Colts to do it. This would have been a great year to get some behind the scenes details.

I think we would have kept them both in absence of such a good trade offer and cut either T. Austin or Tipton.  It was opportunistic, and provided a good, convenient roster management alternative, but I don't think it was either or between Burley and Purifoy, and I think that is why we got the 6. There were plenty of ways to keep 10 DBs

 

I agree that it would be great to observe how it actually came about....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the concern some here have with the trade is that the Seahawks have a solid recent history of taking lightly regarded, not highly drafted players and turning them into very good cornerbacks.

 

Sherman and Browner are just two.   I'm not sure they've spent a high round pick on a corner since Carroll got there.

 

But that hasn't prevented Seattle from getting great corner play.

 

So,  losing Burley may not seem like a loss today.....    but it might a year from today.

 

Just sayin.....

 

I get that.

 

But I'll say, I don't think the Seahawks have some special gift for turning average corners into really good corners. I think those guys worked their butts off to improve their game.

 

And if the Seahawks DO have some special gift with corners, then Burley will be a better player for them than he would have been for us. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we would have kept them both in absence of such a good trade offer and cut either T. Austin or Tipton.  It was opportunistic, and provided a good, convenient roster management alternative, but I don't think it was either or between Burley and Purifoy, and I think that is why we got the 6. There were plenty of ways to keep 10 DBs

 

I agree that it would be great to observe how it actually came about....

 

I think we had to keep Austin, at least for the time being. Holmes and Harrison are both questionable at the moment.

 

Tipton seems like a little bit of a luxury, but if that luxury was made possible because we thinned out the corners, I would think we'd be keeping an offensive lineman or an extra safety, not an extra RB. Five of our 10 OL have injury questions. I think they prioritized RB depth because of Bradshaw.

 

I don't know any of this. It's speculation and conjecture. But that's why I'd like to have been a fly on the wall...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Seahawks call you for a defensive player, any defensive player... Then you should probably keep that player. IMHO

Ryan Freakin Grigson amd Chuck freakin Pagano. Clown show

 

You are giving the Seahawks too much credit and the Colts too little ... you have no idea what the circumstances were and how the roster cut down played into the situation.  I have been openly critical of many of Grigson's decisions, but you seem to find something negative about everything the team does, every player, every decision, etc .... I am often cynical, but you are the epitome of negativity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are giving the Seahawks too much credit and the Colts too little ... you have no idea what the circumstances were and how the roster cut down played into the situation. I have been openly critical of many of Grigson's decisions, but you seem to find something negative about everything the team does, every player, every decision, etc .... I am often cynical, but you are the epitome of negativity.

So I'm supposed to lie and say I always liked Laron Landry. Never liked him. Should I say I always liked Trent Richardson? Never liked him. Thought it was utter stupidity to draft him top 5. But thought it was dumber to trade a 1st rnd pick for him after you saw he wasnt anything special in the pros. Rolling ball of knives... Plastic butter knives.

I liked the TY Hilton pick. Liked the Jones signing. Loved the Nicks signing. I was calling for that when it was unpopular.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Seahawks call you for a defensive player, any defensive player... Then you should probably keep that player. IMHO

Ryan Freakin Grigson amd Chuck freakin Pagano. Clown show

 

But as many people on this thread have mentioned, if there was a choice between Burley and (in this case) Purifoy, they would have gone with Purifoy due to his potential and the fact he played well in the preseason ( and frankly if cut- Purifoy would have been more likely to be claimed.)

 

My point being, although I respect your opinion, I disagree. I think it was a good move by Grigson and Pagano. I would argue if we released Burley- then he would have been claimed by the Seahawks or someone else anyway- so we would have lost Burley and lost out on a 6th round pick ( might not seem a lot but could be later used to trade up or for a decent player.)

 

Also, in regards to about keeping a defensive player the Seahawks want, well perhaps- but we may end up winning this trade so to speak. E.g. our Preseason MVP Casear Rayford from last year- who we traded was released by the Cowboys- this could easily apply to Burley and the Seahawks. They aren't perfect-they will have a few misses- like we have or any other team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But as many people on this thread have mentioned, if there was a choice between Burley and (in this case) Purifoy, they would have gone with Purifoy due to his potential and the fact he played well in the preseason ( and frankly if cut- Purifoy would have been more likely to be claimed.)

My point being, although I respect your opinion, I disagree. I think it was a good move by Grigson and Pagano. I would argue if we released Burley- then he would have been claimed by the Seahawks or someone else anyway- so we would have lost Burley and lost out on a 6th round pick ( might not seem a lot but could be later used to trade up or for a decent player.)

Also, in regards to about keeping a defensive player the Seahawks want, well perhaps- but we may end up winning this trade so to speak. E.g. our Preseason MVP Casear Rayford from last year- who we traded was released by the Cowboys- this could easily apply to Burley and the Seahawks. They aren't perfect-they will have a few misses- like we have or any other team.

I think you should keep as many dbs as you can. Is there a maximum the league sets per position? Does Harnish have a roster spot? Trent Richardson?

Havili? Well those are 3 people I'd rather keep a db over.

I still don't get the Harnish experiment. If he's playing, we're screwed.

I'd just like to add, your post was so refreshing. You disagreed with me, but was respectful. No childish insults. You sir make believe in the future of this nation. Its still good people here and there. Thank you and have a nice labor day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should keep as many dbs as you can. Is there a maximum the league sets per position? Does Harnish have a roster spot? Trent Richardson?

Havili? Well those are 3 people I'd rather keep a db over.

I still don't get the Harnish experiment. If he's playing, we're screwed.

Harnish is not on the roster ( thank god)

I think Havili doesn't count against the roster yet (PUP)

I'm still in the camp that believes Richardson can and will improve a lot.

 

overall I liked the choices made yesterday. The only questionable one was Thomas Austin. But in regards to DBs, I would look at Craig Loston and Ed Reynolds for safety and Leon McFadden for corner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Seahawks call you for a defensive player, any defensive player... Then you should probably keep that player. IMHO

Ryan Freakin Grigson amd Chuck freakin Pagano. Clown show

My gawd! I can't believe we just let this guy go.. An UDFA for a 6th...sounds pretty good to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm supposed to lie and say I always liked Laron Landry. Never liked him. Should I say I always liked Trent Richardson? Never liked him. Thought it was utter stupidity to draft him top 5. But thought it was dumber to trade a 1st rnd pick for him after you saw he wasnt anything special in the pros. Rolling ball of knives... Plastic butter knives.

I liked the TY Hilton pick. Liked the Jones signing. Loved the Nicks signing. I was calling for that when it was unpopular.

I thought you weren't going to post here anymore..

Link to post
Share on other sites

My gawd! I can't believe we just let this guy go.. An UDFA for a 6th...sounds pretty good to me

 

I have to agree...

Although he has looked pretty good this preseason, one thing to remember about Marcus Burley, is his career history.

 

He came into the league in 2013 and was cut by four teams. Even when he was on a teams roster, it was only practice squad participation.

 

We may be over reacting just a bit, with the failure of the Burley trade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Burley

 

Career history

 

*Offseason and/or practice squad member only

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Age and health would be the argument for Smith and Leonard right now.  It’s not all about position.
    • It is my understanding the Colts grade every player on every pay.  Their has to be a method.  It was my understanding, i don't KNOW, that more teams than not subscribe to PFF, for their own reasons. Perhaps they too snark at their numbers.    The story i recently read/heard about a fumble recovery for a touchdown turned one DE's weekly grade from the 60's to near 90, well, that is very concerning if true.  The best way to see if someone is any good was back when i watched every Colts play in super slow-mo, sometimes frame by frame to see what really happened. Unfortunately i couldn't compliment that with all-22.  AC looked BAD for his 1st 3 seasons in pass-pro, and Andrew was terrible with timing and accuracy in the short game. Based on Harbaugh's pre-draft hype, and others of course "not since Elway," that part of his game disgusted me.  PFF can't reflect how much benefit or damage is done by the overall effectiveness of those around you, or good or bad coaching. Ras isn't everything but is a very solid place to start.
    • Nate only missed 1 kick in the Divisional round loss against the Patriots, it was a what would've been a then career long 54 yarder when he was rushed on to the field to attempt it as time was expiring due to the Chargers having burned all their timeouts. Had he made that kick, it would've only tied the game, not given San Diego the lead or win. He converted all 3 of his extra point attempts in that game.   He was brutal in the 2009 Divisional round loss to the Jets, he had only missed 3 kicks all season and missed 3 in that game alone, although one of them was a  57 yard attempt that would've tied his career long. He had already missed a 36 yarder and that Bolts were up 7-0 when Norv trotted him out to attempt that long one at the end of the half, and that miss combined with the earlier one seemed to scramble his eggs. Later in the game while down by 10, he badly missed a 40 yard attempt and although the Chargers got another touchdown, they ended up losing by 3.    He missed when he hit the upright from 48 yards out in the 2007 Divisional round victory at Indy and in the only AFCCG he played in, Kaeding accounted for all 12 of the Chargers' points by going 4 for 4 against the undefeated Patriots in the snow flurries at Foxboro.
    • You're probably right.  But a franchise LT is the more important position.  More than RT, and even an All Pro LB.   I'm not saying he'll sacrifice either of them in order to sign Fisher long term.  But I think that once they see that Fisher can play, they'll want to wrap him up long term.  He won't be cheap either.   I think it was on one of the podcast they pointed out where all of the LTs for the playoff teams were drafted.  Getting one that works out past the first round is pretty rare.  And we probably won't even have a first rounder next year.
    • That's possible, and sounds familiar. So how many plays might that happen on in a given game, and how many players are affected by it? Ultimately, what kind of impact could it have on a player grade if PFF throws out 5-10 plays a game?   Also, if a player was nursing a left leg injury, and used a different technique than usual to try to mitigate that injury, in turn taking a loss on a few plays, PFF grades them negatively. Which is fine. But that might result in a player having a month of lower grading than usual, with PFF not acknowledging the injury in their grading. They publish those lower grades, and fans/media say 'this player had a bad month at the end of last season, he's not a hot free agent.' Team X says 'he's outstanding when he's healthy, and he battled through injury, let's give him a huge contract,' and the response is 'PFF says he's not that good, that's a bad contract.'    Nothing wrong with PFF's grade, he did have a bad month. But they have a blind spot to context in their raw grading. And people who consume their grades have a tendency to quote them as if they are definitive. That's my overall point about their grading, and why it's not as valuable to me as it seems to be to others.
  • Members

    • adubb84

      adubb84 421

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shafty138

      Shafty138 1,497

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 542

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 94

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsblue1844

      coltsblue1844 147

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 231

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 121

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 296

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjrichard

      cjrichard 66

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 341

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...