Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Lets talk about our WR core


Nesjan3

Recommended Posts

Alright so i want to know what people think is going to happen to our WR core.

Which goes as follow, Reggie, TY, Nicks, Rogers, Whalen , Brazill, Moncrief, plus the other 3 or 4 UDA that are trying out.

BEST case scenario:

Reggie returns to Super Reggie for another 2 or 3 years injury free, TY keeps being TY burning defences, Nicks returns to the form he was in a couple years ago, Rogers and Moncrief develop into outstanding starters (i think). Unfortunately Whalen and Brazill would be cut if this happened unless we keep 6 or 7 receivers.... but i think this would be the best scenario.

 

but i dont want to be a downer but lets play "What IF".

 

What if Reggie doesnt return to form after his injury and retires after this year after his contract is up.

What if Nicks doesnt return to the guy he used to be (which alot of Giant fans say he will never be)

In all reality Rogers has potential but is a (Hopefully becomes great kind of guy)

Moncrief has all the potential as well and i believe he will beat out Whalen and Brazill but is still a rookie.

Brazill at the end of last season showed a lot of promise but he has previous suspension issues.

Whalen has been solid for us despite injury.

 

Now i think we will carry 6 recievers just because of these "What If" scenarios, and i think it will be Brazill beating out Whalen.

 

What do guys think, do we take the chance on our top 5 or do we keep these depth guys around just in case

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i dont know brazil has big play ability. 

 

I'm not sure why you don't know this....   big play ability is the one ability Brazil has clearly demonstrated.

 

Here's his profile from the website:

 

http://www.colts.com/team/roster/LaVon-Brazill/9bfb7dfd-23ab-46da-a423-ca0226e53cac

 

 

To summarize....  nearly 17.0 yards a catch his rookie year....    13.5 yards a catch this past year.

 

And in the playoffs this January,  6 catches for more than 21 yards a catch and two TD's....

 

The kid has talent.     I don't think we'll have to cut him.    If we decide to, I think we'll be able to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why you don't know this....   big play ability is the one ability Brazil has clearly demonstrated.

 

Here's his profile from the website:

 

http://www.colts.com/team/roster/LaVon-Brazill/9bfb7dfd-23ab-46da-a423-ca0226e53cac

 

 

To summarize....  nearly 17.0 yards a catch his rookie year....    13.5 yards a catch this past year.

 

And in the playoffs this January,  6 catches for more than 21 yards a catch and two TD's....

 

The kid has talent.     I don't think we'll have to cut him.    If we decide to, I think we'll be able to trade him.

 

no Im saying brazil has big play ability disagreeing about keeping whalen over him. I should have put a period after I dont know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no Im saying brazil has big play ability disagreeing about keeping whalen over him. I should have put a period after I dont know

 

Got it!    :thmup:

 

Thanks, I appreciate you clearing that up.....    makes much more sense now!      :thmup:

 

Makes for a good off-season laugh!    :spit:     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get it right or this thread could become a corpse. Just trying to get to the core of the problem.

Of course we can probably be coerced into thoroughly discussing the core aspects of the receiving corps... but would doing so be deemed too coarse? Curses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be a tuff choice for the front office when the time comes . Brazil has been coming along and showing big play ability . Whalen is a chain mover has a knack for finding holes in D and moving the chains . If Reggie is back one has to go just the way it is . I think it will be Brazil just because I believe we will get a conditional pick, safety, or a position of need for him in return where I don't see any team giving anything for Whalen . We have a lot of big play guys and I believe Brazil has a higher ceiling but he's one failed test from a long suspension and we have a lot of big play guys where Reggie is the only other possession type receiver we have that's why I believe it's a tuff choice .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is each guy has given us plenty of reasons to keep him:

Wayne - don't even need to list why he deserves to stay, after all these years

Hilton - speed like mad, a reliable #2 who was able to take over #1 when Reggie went out, though I don't think he can ever be a true #1

Nicks - if healthy, tons of potential, could be a #1, and still young

Moncrief - has the physical tools to be a #1

Rogers - same as Moncrief

Brazill - I see him as a really underrated player.  To me, his ceiling is as a #2 receiver, but he would need to work really hard to get there

Whalen - all he did when he played was convert 3rd downs and make tacklers miss

 

I wouldn't want to get rid of any of these guys, but it's unrealistic to keep 7 WRs.  It's a hard choice.  Not only that, but trading any of the bottom guys would get us a minimal return, and putting any on the practice squad could result in us losing them for nothing.  I think it's more worth it to just find a way to keep 7 WRs.  If I had to pick one to put to the practice squad or get rid of, I guess it would have to be Whalen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all that comes to fruition it is a nice problem to have. I think we also keep 6 as some of the guys can play special teams. Brazil has been an effective gunner and Griff has shown he can return punts effectively. It'll be interesting to see if TY will be returning punts again this year. Brazil has more upside than Griff, but Griff has way better hands and I just flat out like the kid's grit. Best case scenario would be to get something in return for Griff or Brazil in a trade.

 

As an aside, does Moncrief have any punt/kick return abilities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have plenty of big play guys. We need a chain mover especially with Wayne coming off the injury.

Bingo... Whalen did plenty for this team last year. There was at least one game where he was one of the few receivers moving the chains.

He doesn't seem that fast. He's not big. He doesn't seem that strong. He is shifty though and has a knack for making critical plays at critical times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whalen could be what Austin Collie couldve been if he didnt have the concussions... If it came down to it, id cut brazill and keep Whalen.

Moncrief, Rogers and Nicks all possess the ability of Brazill, therefore he is more expendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we keep 6 because there's a possibility that Wayne doesn't come back after this year, and Nicks may not be re-signed.

 

In that case, in 2015 we would have:

1. T.Y. Hilton

2. Rogers

3. Moncrief

4. Whalen or Brazill.

 

With the group of receivers mentioned above, Whalen offers much more value as a 'possession' receiver than Brazill as a 'big play' receiver. The other guys have plenty of 'big play' ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both Whalen and Brazill but Brazill has the physical attributes in a WR that is really hard to part ways with.

That's why receivers like Brazill are getting drafted and receivers like Whalen are UDFA's.

Thats no disrespect at all toward Whalen it's just the diference in upside or potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we keep as much talent at WR as we can. I was going to go on a rant about keep Brazill over Whalen but it's not nessacary. I can see use keeping 6 guys because having depth in a passing league is a great thing to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright so i want to know what people think is going to happen to our WR core.

Which goes as follow, Reggie, TY, Nicks, Rogers, Whalen , Brazill, Moncrief, plus the other 3 or 4 UDA that are trying out.

BEST case scenario:

Reggie returns to Super Reggie for another 2 or 3 years injury free, TY keeps being TY burning defences, Nicks returns to the form he was in a couple years ago, Rogers and Moncrief develop into outstanding starters (i think). Unfortunately Whalen and Brazill would be cut if this happened unless we keep 6 or 7 receivers.... but i think this would be the best scenario.

 

but i dont want to be a downer but lets play "What IF".

 

What if Reggie doesnt return to form after his injury and retires after this year after his contract is up.

What if Nicks doesnt return to the guy he used to be (which alot of Giant fans say he will never be)

In all reality Rogers has potential but is a (Hopefully becomes great kind of guy)

Moncrief has all the potential as well and i believe he will beat out Whalen and Brazill but is still a rookie.

Brazill at the end of last season showed a lot of promise but he has previous suspension issues.

Whalen has been solid for us despite injury.

 

Now i think we will carry 6 recievers just because of these "What If" scenarios, and i think it will be Brazill beating out Whalen.

 

What do guys think, do we take the chance on our top 5 or do we keep these depth guys around just in case

keep 7, cut full backs, go pass happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG, I've just had the most amazing epiphany!  Many of you armchair GMs out there are going to see the brilliance instantly!

 

Cut everyone except Luck and the WRs, and pick up every other WR that gets dropped, is available for trade, or is tired of working at KMart.  The lineup will then be Luck and 52 WRs.  It won't matter that we are fielding WRs at every position, because the guys we have are all terrible (I know this for fact, because I've read it on this board!). 

 

There may be some issue in declaring everyone eligible on every play, but who could possibly defend the confounding 10 WR sets... and with all the WRs playing D, too, imagine all the interceptions we'll get to watch.

 

I think I'll start crafting my letters to Grigs and Irsay right now!  Who's with me?  (Somehow I picture Will Ferrell streaking in Old School as I type this...)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, unless we have an injury then I don't see Whalen making the team. I also believe we will shop Brazil for another position before the final 53 cut down. I expect to see Brazil get a lot of playing time in preseason to entice other teams.

It makes more sense to keep 5 receivers on the 53 and sign one of the new young receivers to the PS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG, I've just had the most amazing epiphany! Many of you armchair GMs out there are going to see the brilliance instantly!

Cut everyone except Luck and the WRs, and pick up every other WR that gets dropped, is available for trade, or is tired of working at KMart. The lineup will then be Luck and 52 WRs. It won't matter that we are fielding WRs at every position, because the guys we have are all terrible (I know this for fact, because I've read it on this board!).

There may be some issue in declaring everyone eligible on every play, but who could possibly defend the confounding 10 WR sets... and with all the WRs playing D, too, imagine all the interceptions we'll get to watch.

I think I'll start crafting my letters to Grigs and Irsay right now! Who's with me? (Somehow I picture Will Ferrell streaking in Old School as I type this...)

I don't get it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG, I've just had the most amazing epiphany!  Many of you armchair GMs out there are going to see the brilliance instantly!

 

Cut everyone except Luck and the WRs, and pick up every other WR that gets dropped, is available for trade, or is tired of working at KMart.  The lineup will then be Luck and 52 WRs.  It won't matter that we are fielding WRs at every position, because the guys we have are all terrible (I know this for fact, because I've read it on this board!). 

 

There may be some issue in declaring everyone eligible on every play, but who could possibly defend the confounding 10 WR sets... and with all the WRs playing D, too, imagine all the interceptions we'll get to watch.

 

I think I'll start crafting my letters to Grigs and Irsay right now!  Who's with me?  (Somehow I picture Will Ferrell streaking in Old School as I type this...)

 

I............smell..................................................championship!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to play devils advocate here and just throw out some scenario's that I believe will happen.

 

- Reggie retires next year (this is his final season under contract I believe)

     Reggie has nothing left to prove in my opinion and I think he hangs them up after next season

 

- Nicks is paid by the Colts next year to take over for Reggie, after a good season this year

     I look for Nicks to put up a solid season next year. I wouldn't be suprised if he gets close to 1000 yards, which I believe will be enough for the Colts to give him the nod for a couple more years after that.

 

- TY and Fleener are both traded next year for extra draft picks

    I know I will get heat for this but everyone keeps talking about trading Brazill, why? He's not going to net the Colts anything, and as others have said, when given the opportunity he has played well. I think the Colts need to get quality in return if they are looking to trade a WR and that's TY. TY could easily land us a 2nd round pick, if not a 1st if he has another good year this year. That draft class alone could kill the Colts cap, and I believe Luck and Allen are worth the money, however I think TY could be replaced and I would sell now - 2015 - with his stock being so high. Fleener, with another decent year, could probably net us a 4th, maybe a 3rd depending on how much he improves on last year. I know it's a loss from where we initially got him but if we get a high pick out of TY, it's a wash.

 

- Moncrief and Rogers, along with Nicks, become the starting WR's with Brazill backing them up (2015)

   I believe these 4 guys are the future for the Colts in the coming years. A great mix of size and speed, which could help tremendously in the run game. These guys along with Allen will give Luck some huge targets for a good portion of his career.

 

Again, these are just some scenario's that I believe will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
    • Gus is aware of this too.  I don’t think Fields can keep this up.  I really like our team this week 
    • The advantages of an offensive minded head coach with a young QB are many. For example, if the HC is installing the offensive system. So if your young QB is a success, when your OC inevitably gets hired away by another team, the offensive structure will remain.    There's also the fact that defensive minded HCs seem to have trouble relating to young QBs. They're inherently risk averse, and overly reliant on their defense, so the overall approach to the game is conservative, which means every mistake by the QB gets highlighted by the coach's negative response. And I don't mean yelling and screaming on the sideline, I mean the QB turns the ball over in the first half, so the rest of the game the offense is super run heavy.    This is not true of all defensive minded guys, and there are some offensive minded HCs who struggle the same way. But I would lean toward an offensive coach if I had a young or developing QB, almost exclusively. I definitely don't think Eberflus is the right guy, but at least he's shown some growth in the last year or two. I was surprised by how much Hard Knocks showed him meeting solo with Caleb Williams.
    • seems slow to me...I don't think those cement inserts are working
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...