Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Most underrated players in the draft


Recommended Posts

IMO, some underrated players are:

 Carl Bradford-OLB

 Jordan Zumwalt-OLB/ILB

 Kenny Ladler-FS

 Josh Mauro-DE

 Dontae Johnson-CB/FS

 

 

I like Bradford alot and when you put on his tape...i see another Junior Seau! If we didn't have so many holes, i would be happy to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Donte Moncrief is the most underrated offensive player. He has the size, speed, and route running to be a #1 WR. Since we signed Nicks and with Wayne coming back many of us including myself have ruled out drafting a WR, but you never know with Grigson. If he's there in the 3rd and he's the BPA, Grigson will take him over a need. We don't know if Wayne who's 35 and Nicks has had his share of injuries will stay healthy. Moncrief could be an option in the 3rd.

 

Defensively, i think Daquan Jones is the most underrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think of Laurent Duvernay-Tardif?

 

Not so much underrated, more like under the radar because there hasn't been a lot of great prospects coming from Quebec.

 

But I can say as someone from Montreal that there is a lot of hype around him over here!

 

Does he look like the type of guy that Grigson could look at during the 4th round? (IF he is still available at that point, it looks like Seahawks and Packers have a big man crush on him)

 

(Sorry for the long post, I actually wanted to start a topic about him but I have not posted enough yet)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D'Anthony Thomas.

I might take flack for this but the guy is one of the most electric playmakers in the draft. What he would bring to a team is a great return man and a good change of pace back, reminds me a little of a slightly skinnier but slightly quicker version of Darren Sproles.

Honestly I'd take him if he's there in the 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D'Anthony Thomas.

I might take flack for this but the guy is one of the most electric playmakers in the draft. What he would bring to a team is a great return man and a good change of pace back, reminds me a little of a slightly skinnier but slightly quicker version of Darren Sproles.

Honestly I'd take him if he's there in the 5th.

 

A lighter, weaker Kerwynn Williams. The league isn't built for this type of player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lighter, weaker Kerwynn Williams. The league isn't built for this type of player.

He can put about 25 pounds on and also there are lots of other players at other positions that have had alot of success, Darren Sproles immediately comes to mind at rb, Steve Smith at WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can put about 25 pounds on and also there are lots of other players at other positions that have had alot of success, Darren Sproles immediately comes to mind at rb, Steve Smith at WR

 

There a very few of those type who have had success. Sproles could be said to be one, but he is considersably stronger and as one of the best cutters the league has ever seen.

 

Thomas doesn't (nor will he) play WR so I do not know how that is relevant.

 

P.S. He is not putting 25 pounds on... get real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There a very few of those type who have had success. Sproles could be said to be one, but he is considersably stronger and as one of the best cutters the league has ever seen.

 

Thomas doesn't (nor will he) play WR so I do not know how that is relevant.

 

P.S. He is not putting 25 pounds on... get real.

I didn't say he would put 25 pounds on, I said he could if coaches asked him to, Thomas I see listed as an Offensive Weapon or Scat Back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say he would put 25 pounds on, I said he could if coaches asked him to, Thomas I see listed as an Offensive Weapon or Scat Back

 

Why would they ask him to?

 

Neither OW or Scat Back mean wide receiver... he may line up in the slot on occassion, but that does not make him a WR.

 

My point stands... he will be drafted, probably in the 5th, but I don't see him ever making an impact in the league like so many similar players before him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There a very few of those type who have had success. Sproles could be said to be one, but he is considersably stronger and as one of the best cutters the league has ever seen.

 

Thomas doesn't (nor will he) play WR so I do not know how that is relevant.

 

P.S. He is not putting 25 pounds on... get real.

 

Giovanni Bernard is literally a Darren Sproles clone and he's done pretty well for himself. He's a gadget player, who are a new type of player that we see in the league. Similar to Tavon Austin. They're not the biggest people who are elite at any one thing, but they make plays somewhere. I give it another year or 2 and these guys will be the hot commodity in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giovanni Bernard is literally a Darren Sproles clone and he's done pretty well for himself. He's a gadget player, who are a new type of player that we see in the league. Similar to Tavon Austin. They're not the biggest people who are elite at any one thing, but they make plays somewhere. I give it another year or 2 and these guys will be the hot commodity in the NFL.

 

Are you comparing D'Anthony Thomas to Giovani Bernard?

 

That does not even deserve a rebuttal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you comparing D'Anthony Thomas to Giovani Bernard?

 

That does not even deserve a rebuttal.

 

Not in terms of skill but in terms of position. Thomas is not Bernarnd but he's similar in the fact that he's not just a pure RB. He's a guy who can make plays, especially in space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in terms of skill but in terms of position. Thomas is not Bernarnd but he's similar in the fact that he's not just a pure RB. He's a guy who can make plays, especially in space.

 

Ugh... I shouldn't have to spell this out for you... Bernard is over 30 pounds heavier... he has a completely different body type and is a completely different type of player. They are both shifty, that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh... I shouldn't have to spell this out for you... Bernard is over 30 pounds heavier... he has a completely different body type and is a completely different type of player. They are both shifty, that's it.

 

Yeah but Bernard also isn't a 3 down back, and most of his damage came from catching the ball out of the backfield and making people miss. Thomas brings the same type of game. He is a scat back coming out of the back field but if you get him in space and let him catch the ball, he'll make people miss and get YAC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say he would put 25 pounds on, I said he could if coaches asked him to, Thomas I see listed as an Offensive Weapon or Scat Back

He doesn't have the frame for that. But he'll have a great career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There a very few of those type who have had success. Sproles could be said to be one, but he is considersably stronger and as one of the best cutters the league has ever seen.

Thomas doesn't (nor will he) play WR so I do not know how that is relevant.

P.S. He is not putting 25 pounds on... get real.

I'll be surprised if his future isn't in the slot. He lined up in the slot half the time his first two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but Bernard also isn't a 3 down back, and most of his damage came from catching the ball out of the backfield and making people miss. Thomas brings the same type of game. He is a scat back coming out of the back field but if you get him in space and let him catch the ball, he'll make people miss and get YAC.

They are not the same type of player. Stop trying to rationalize it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they ask him to?

 

Neither OW or Scat Back mean wide receiver... he may line up in the slot on occassion, but that does not make him a WR.

 

My point stands... he will be drafted, probably in the 5th, but I don't see him ever making an impact in the league like so many similar players before him.

 I doubt they would ask him to put on 25lbs, But he will put on some weight in his career at some point, Dont know how much but coaches will get him into a strength program so I expect he will put on some muscle and weight, OW means exactly that...OW, That could be in the slot, in the backfield, He has something that cant be taught and thats pure speed,  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I doubt they would ask him to put on 25lbs, But he will put on some weight in his career at some point, Dont know how much but coaches will get him into a strength program so I expect he will put on some muscle and weight, OW means exactly that...OW, That could be in the slot, in the backfield, He has something that cant be taught and thats pure speed,  

 

I am well aware of what it means, thanks. But only a handful of those type of players succeed in this league and none dominate. He is not as good as the OW types who have come before him and is simply too light for this league. I have seen this 100 times before, people get so worked up about these types of players but very few pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think u r missing my point. Pick a player that fits and excels in your scheme. Guys like Nabers and MJH are freaks and r not scheme dependant. Think of the Rams. Kupp is good, but they dipped into the draft and amazingly draft another stud because he fits their scheme and does not have elite triats. It is similar to the way they draft corners. They r typical zone corners. U can let one-way if they want to much as u can go back into the draft and hopefully get another in the 2nd. That is my point.
    • Thanks for trying to get it back on topic.   People just can't resist trying to turn every other thread into a Ballard grievance thread.       I thought the same thing on Georgia Defensive players   Lassiter and Bullard would be the (2) I would suspect we're most likely, if any.   I agree though, don't fit Ballard's profile too well.     Probably just used them as a good example, as they do have a great defensive coach and have put a lot of players in the league.
    • Lmao.  Yeah.   I know you think you are this great evaluation guy.  Look at the numbers.  
    • Having Ballard as your GM is liking living through the cycke of abuse lol He can't really move up because we have to many holes to fill because of his lack luster drafting.  So, he prefers to move back to accumulate more pics, hoping he has more of a chance of those pics turning out. Quality over quality. Now that philosophy really isn't worked. So here we are again having holes to fill and unable to move up because we have to move back to correct his erros, which will go on and on lol. 
    • Ballard praised Georgia defensive players and their knowledge of the game.   Georgia defensive players in this year's draft, per Scouts Inc (ESPN): Kamari Lassiter, CB, #45 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for DBs) Javon Bullard, S, #49 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for safeties) Tykee Smith, S, #97 (not a great fit for Ballard's profile for safeties) Zion Logue, DT, #222 (long, big, not a standout athlete) Jontrey Hunter, LB, #316 (not a great fit from a size standpoint, didn't run)
  • Members

    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,541

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,570

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,758

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 7,039

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,019

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,379

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shaolin06

      Shaolin06 28

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...