Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2014 NFL Mock Draft: Matt Miller's Updated 7-Round Predictions


Recommended Posts

I would take this draft. but no interior OL is a little rough to see, maybe flip Skov to a OG prospect.

 

Being a Badger fan, I am incredibly mixed about Dez.  He is extremely athletic, but all the games where we were beat deep, it was his side while he playing safety.  I would however take him in the 6th due to his physical tools alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Skov fall to the 5th...and I wouldn't take him if he were there.

 

Really?  I don't get why people are so down on Skov. I like him a lot but maybe I need to watch more of him.  A while back, Superman (I think) posted a thread about whether we needed a rangy/cover ILB or a thumper.  I hadn't given it much thought at the time but have read up a little bit more and given it more thought and as best I can tell, almost all of the ILB's we have currently are more in the range/cover mold.  The only ones I see that could possibly become the thumper type ILB are McNary and Muamba but I'm not holding my breath that either will become that type of ILB.  I think Skov could be the thumper ILB in the middle next to Jackson/Freeman.

 

Right now my preference for ILB, should we draft one, is Skov > Preston Brown > Max Bullough > Yawin Smallwood.  These are the ones I've watched the most.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really?  I don't get why people are so down on Skov. I like him a lot but maybe I need to watch more of him.  A while back, Superman (I think) posted a thread about whether we needed a rangy/cover ILB or a thumper.  I hadn't given it much thought at the time but have read up a little bit more and given it more thought and as best I can tell, almost all of the ILB's we have currently are more in the range/cover mold.  The only ones I see that could possibly become the thumper type ILB are McNary and Muamba but I'm not holding my breath that either will become that type of ILB.  I think Skov could be the thumper ILB in the middle next to Jackson/Freeman.

 

Right now my preference for ILB, should we draft one, is Skov > Preston Brown > Max Bullough > Yawin Smallwood.  These are the ones I've watched the most.  

Well, I've already made my distaste for this ILB class well known.  So my analysis of these players assumes we're talking abotu a 5th round, 26th overall selection by the Colts.   My problem with Skov is the same problem I have with Bullough, average to good instincts, but a liability in coverage and sideline to sideline tackling.  We run a lot of man, so that poses significant problems on 2nd/3rd down and mid-range to go.  At least with Bullough, you don't have the serious injury history.  And while in Bullough, you've got character flaws, I'll take his character issue (which I see as more of an isolated lapse in judgment than recorded pattern of mistakes) to Skov's knees. 

 

To me, the only two I'd consider taking is Brown and Smallwood.  They have a lot of the same deficiencies (speed, coverage, play recognition etc. - obviously not to an identical degree) that Skov and Bullough have.  But at least with Brown and Smallwood, their game tape looks faster than what their combine times would indicate.  Would I be satisfied with picking Smallwood or Brown in the 5th?  I guess, maybe.  But there's a number of guys that, if available, I'd rather take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I've already made my distaste for this ILB class well known.  So my analysis of these players assumes we're talking abotu a 5th round, 26th overall selection by the Colts.   My problem with Skov is the same problem I have with Bullough, average to good instincts, but a liability in coverage and sideline to sideline tackling.  We run a lot of man, so that poses significant problems on 2nd/3rd down and mid-range to go.  At least with Bullough, you don't have the serious injury history.  And while in Bullough, you've got character flaws, I'll take his character issue (which I see as more of an isolated lapse in judgment than recorded pattern of mistakes) to Skov's knees. 

 

To me, the only two I'd consider taking is Brown and Smallwood.  They have a lot of the same deficiencies (speed, coverage, play recognition etc. - obviously not to an identical degree) that Skov and Bullough have.  But at least with Brown and Smallwood, their game tape looks faster than what their combine times would indicate.  Would I be satisfied with picking Smallwood or Brown in the 5th?  I guess, maybe.  But there's a number of guys that, if available, I'd rather take.

 

I didn't look at any of their stats from timed drills but I don't think Skov plays slow.  The thing is that the things you're describing them as being deficient at are the things the range/cover ILB would be more responsible for.  The thumper ILB would be the more aggressive, take on blockers, blitz from the middle etc.  Many thumper ILB's aren't great in coverage.  Skov isn't great in coverage but I don't think he's as bad as some (not you, this is the first I've read of your opinion on him) make him out to be.  I would't want him in on nickel/dime packages but I don't think it would be the end of the world either if he were stuck on the field unable to be subbed out on a passing down here and there.  

 

Now I will fully admit I haven't read up a whole lot on Skov's past injuries.  However, if he's checked out and deemed 100% healed then I would definitely take him.  

 

I will say I disagree about Skov and Bullough's instincts.  I think that their instincts are their best assets, they just don't have the same level of athleticism of a Smallwood or Brown, and for a thumper ILB I'm fine with that because they shouldn't be asked to cover as much ground if they're on the field with D. Jackson or Freeman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't look at any of their stats from timed drills but I don't think Skov plays slow.  The thing is that the things you're describing them as being deficient at are the things the range/cover ILB would be more responsible for.  The thumper ILB would be the more aggressive, take on blockers, blitz from the middle etc.  Many thumper ILB's aren't great in coverage.  Skov isn't great in coverage but I don't think he's as bad as some (not you, this is the first I've read of your opinion on him) make him out to be.  I would't want him in on nickel/dime packages but I don't think it would be the end of the world either if he were stuck on the field unable to be subbed out on a passing down here and there.  

 

Now I will fully admit I haven't read up a whole lot on Skov's past injuries.  However, if he's checked out and deemed 100% healed then I would definitely take him.  

 

I will say I disagree about Skov and Bullough's instincts.  I think that their instincts are their best assets, they just don't have the same level of athleticism of a Smallwood or Brown, and for a thumper ILB I'm fine with that because they shouldn't be asked to cover as much ground if they're on the field with D. Jackson or Freeman.

 

Well, I don't think they have bad instincts, I did say they had average to good instincts.  They aren't elite or anything.  As far as a smash mouth ILB, they would be fine at that.  But you never really have a guarantee that a run down will actually be a run and vice versa.  I geuss my view on it is, I'd rather have an average run stopper up the middle who gives up a 4 yard run play, but doesn't give up the swing pass to the edge like Freeman than a guy who can get a 1 yard stop up the middle who gives up 5 of on the off tackle.  I know that's an overly simplistic way to view things, but with all the guys you have up the middle, I'd rather beleive that 7 guys in between the hashes can stop a run up the middle than single man-man coverage between an unathletic LB and a RB who can beat him to the edge.  The latter is the bigger threat IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I don't think they have bad instincts, I did say they had average to good instincts.  They aren't elite or anything.  As far as a smash mouth ILB, they would be fine at that.  But you never really have a guarantee that a run down will actually be a run and vice versa.  I geuss my view on it is, I'd rather have an average run stopper up the middle who gives up a 4 yard run play, but doesn't give up the swing pass to the edge like Freeman than a guy who can get a 1 yard stop up the middle who gives up 5 of on the off tackle.  I know that's an overly simplistic way to view things, but with all the guys you have up the middle, I'd rather beleive that 7 guys in between the hashes can stop a run up the middle than single man-man coverage between an unathletic LB and a RB who can beat him to the edge.  The latter is the bigger threat IMO.

 

That's the thing, the smash mouth ILB is the one thing we don't have that I would like to see us get.  You're right that a run down isn't always going to actually be a running play and vice versa, but chances are if it turns into a passing play then the smash mouth ILB would be blitzing, not covering.  As far as that goes, I think that Skov is a very good blitzer from ILB.  And I think I said before but just in case, I also don't think that Skov's coverage ability is so bad that we would be in major trouble if he were asked to cover from time to time.  He's by no means a coverage LB and I wouldn't put him in on sub packages (nickel, dime) or anything like that obviously.  Overall though I think that Skov could thrive in our defense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing, the smash mouth ILB is the one thing we don't have that I would like to see us get.  You're right that a run down isn't always going to actually be a running play and vice versa, but chances are if it turns into a passing play then the smash mouth ILB would be blitzing, not covering.  As far as that goes, I think that Skov is a very good blitzer from ILB.  And I think I said before but just in case, I also don't think that Skov's coverage ability is so bad that we would be in major trouble if he were asked to cover from time to time.  He's by no means a coverage LB and I wouldn't put him in on sub packages (nickel, dime) or anything like that obviously.  Overall though I think that Skov could thrive in our defense.

Alright, I think you've convinced me to the point that I'll go back and watch Skov and re-evaluate as a 5th round prospect.  Before when I was evaluating ILBs, it was before the Jackson signing (which coincidentally I was hoping for as opposed to spending a then 3rd round on Skov where he was projected at the time).  I'll get back to you on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright, I think you've convinced me to the point that I'll go back and watch Skov and re-evaluate as a 5th round prospect.  Before when I was evaluating ILBs, it was before the Jackson signing (which coincidentally I was hoping for as opposed to spending a then 3rd round on Skov where he was projected at the time).  I'll get back to you on this.

 

One other thing to consider...Superman has said before (I think) that he thinks Skov might be a better fit at SamLB in our defense.  He's also talked about Kyle Van Noy being a good hybrid type guy that could play ILB or OLB.  I think Skov (and Jackson Jeffcoat as well) are in that same mold.  They could play the thumper ILB or SamOLB.  Skov in particular though doesn't have the pass rush moves to play RushLB whereas Van Noy and Jeffcoat probably could.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn`t wait to get rid of Angerer and some want a Skov?

How about adding a player who is athletic enough to be a 3 down player and develope his smarts and tackling, Please! 

 

ok, let's go over this again.  First, our defense has 2 ILB's, not just one.  They have different responsibilities.  The one you're referring to would be the Freeman roll which may wind up going to D'Qwell Jackson.  Who knows, at this point, perhaps Jackson and Freeman are the 2 starting ILB's.  In fact, based on the current roster I think that's a given.  However, they're both similar types of ILB.  Neither are going to be the thumper.  The thumper ILB does not necessarily have to be as athletic as the other ILB because his responsibilities are not the same.  

 

If you don't think we have an ILB athletic enough to be a 3 down player then we would need an upgrade over Jackson/Freeman.  If you don't think Freeman is that guy then I have no problem with that.  He's been good but not really great.  However I could argue that a good part of the reason he has struggled at times is because he doesn't have the right type of ILB next to him.  If you think Jackson is going to be that guy then I would be prepared to be disappointed.

 

Back to Skov, I think he could be a playmaker at stopping the run and blitzing from the inside.  We do not currently have a beastly ILB like that.  Depending on how the board fell I would be tempted to take Skov in the 3rd...again, that's dependent on how the board falls.  If McGill, Jean Baptiste or another equally talented CB is still there then I definitely take them.  If a good OLB falls to our 3rd round pick then I would take that guy.  If all of those are gone then I would consider either Skov or Dion Bailey in the 3rd, or try to trade back for a couple of early 4ths and hope to be able to grab both of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing to consider...Superman has said before (I think) that he thinks Skov might be a better fit at SamLB in our defense.  He's also talked about Kyle Van Noy being a good hybrid type guy that could play ILB or OLB.  I think Skov (and Jackson Jeffcoat as well) are in that same mold.  They could play the thumper ILB or SamOLB.  Skov in particular though doesn't have the pass rush moves to play RushLB whereas Van Noy and Jeffcoat probably could.  

 

Just to verify, yes, I do think that. Not a big fan of Skov period, but I'd prefer to put him at Sam rather than Mike or Will. 

 

Van Noy would be a very intriguing hybrid guy, if you want to have a sizable player in the middle, who can then push out to the Sam spot on passing downs. And Van Noy is excellent in coverage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to verify, yes, I do think that. Not a big fan of Skov period, but I'd prefer to put him at Sam rather than Mike or Will. 

 

Van Noy would be a very intriguing hybrid guy, if you want to have a sizable player in the middle, who can then push out to the Sam spot on passing downs. And Van Noy is excellent in coverage.

 

I agree about Van Noy but we have to hope he falls to us in the 2nd to have a chance at him.  Now, I also think Jackson Jeffcoat could play that role and is also a better straight up pass rusher than Skov.  If we can't get Attachou, Van Noy or Marcus Smith in the 2nd then I wouldn't mind grabbing Jeffcoat in the 3rd....especially if that meant we got Terrence Brooks in the 2nd.

 

Superman, just curious, have you looked much at Jeffcoat?  Would be interested in your opinion of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't have names for each pick but I'd like to see a draft like this unless there is a no brainer Best player available.

2- Best Corner or Safety

3- Best Safety or Corner (Whichever we don't choose first)

5- Best Interior O-Lineman

6- Best Linebacker (Inside or Outside)

7- Best Interior O-Lineman

Again unless there are no brainer BPA's available at each spot, this is how I'd like the draft to look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm thinking the reason these Watson topics get locked is because the conversation starts veering into opinions about matters that are not relevant.  In this case, what Easterby is or isn't, and therefore by extension what HOU is or isn't by their employment of him.  Your opinion is determined by whatever lens you own, not proven facts.  Apparently, the locker room and NFL have a diverse set of lenses whereby some things are bigger deals to some players and not such a big deal to others.   It seems some support Watson holding out for a trade because their lens shows them that HOU is bad for the reasons of Easterby and McNair.    So they are supporting Watson holding out for a trade, but, its for different reason than Watson has expressed.   That's why I was wondering why irrelevant topics are being brought into a discussion about Watson and the reasons motivating a trade.  His reasons need to be understood because they would carry on to another owner.  Its not about the reasons we think he should want one, or the reasons why JJWatt thinks he should want one.    Watson's reasons are clearly about EB.  And if Watson is linking Bienemy to a violation of the Rooney Rule, the Rooney Rule has been around for about 15 years and the Texans have complied.  Its almost like he's taken a 3 minute look at the EB situation and expressed a public hot take conclusion without even knowing the Texans record of complying with the Rooney Rule.            
    • I agree what did most pundits say that we had the most complete roster in football last season.  Why, because Ballard built that through the draft for the most part and it hasn't put the team in salary cap hell like many other teams that don't even have the roster that we have so the credit goes to Ballard. 
    • I think the Browns were a lot better team after free agency. Are they championship level no but a lot better. I don't know why Dorsey got fired I thought he was doing a good job trying to make up for no talent.  My point is there are times that you need to dabble in free agency but it is better much better to go the draft rout.  
    • After the 49ers pulled off the exact trade up to the 3rd pick (that I suggested the Colts should do), I would fall over in laughter if they passed on Fields for Jones or Lance.  Fields is just as much the generational prospect as Lawrence.  When you look at the film and compare the numbers it really is a no brainer.  Here’s another Fields stat that puts him above the others.     The average rank of defenses that Fields has faced in his career is around low to mid twenties. Not too many cupcakes or soft touches.  Meanwhile Lawrence, Wilson, & Jones average defensive opponents is in the 40’s or much higher. So Fields put up better career numbers than all of the other QB’s while facing tougher competition week in and week out.     Better career accuracy. Better career rating past his first read (dispelled that lie about him).  Oh and he scored higher on an aptitude test than thousands of other professional athletes from multiple sports who have taken the same test.  Offered a scholarship to Harvard.  Kid is a smart pocket passer who is athletic and can run.  But he has no problem standing in the pocket and delivering accurate throws with conflict happening all around him.    I believe Kyle is just putting Fields to the ultimate test.  He remembers him from his high school QB camp where Fields took the things he learned there and improved his game to the point where he legitimately rivaled Lawrence as the best QB in the country.  Helped turn the best dual threat QB into the most accurate career passer in this draft.  And easily the most fundamentally sound.  That’s growth.    Also Kyle gets to see how Fields handles all of the chatter about Wilson & Jones & Lance being better.  How does he handle the 49ers not attending his first pro day?  How does he handle the leaks attacking his work ethic and commitment?  They could be looking for signs to how he will handle adversity on and off the field at the next level.  So far he’s been near perfect.  The fact he didn’t snap on Orlovsky shows great maturity.  Best QB in the draft. Just pray the Patriots don’t move up to 4th and get him if the 49ers are dumb enough to pass on him after moving up to the 3rd pick. 
    • Yes, I agree with you but I totally believe that Ballard has a plan and will do what's best for our team. I mean he knows better than any of us that he needs a left tackle and a pass rusher he's fully aware of it.  I have total and complete faith in Ballard that he'll put a championship level team on the field come week one. 
  • Members

    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 458

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BigO

      BigO 58

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfansince65

      coltsfansince65 849

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 470

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • hoosierhawk

      hoosierhawk 818

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ponyboy

      ponyboy 67

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dcuse

      Dcuse 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 2,317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 106

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 8,508

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...