Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Report: Colts agree to one year deal with Hakeem Nicks (merge)


lennymoore24

Recommended Posts

So, if none of them showed they would be fine if Reggie went down or doesn't return to form, then he must not have faith that they can develop or or does not have faith the coaches can develop them.

Is he supposed to have that much faith in a 6th round pick and 2 undrafted guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 401
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, think about that for a second.  The only way to become a "proven" player is you know, to play.  He (Grigson) has two proven 1000 yard receivers on the team so there is a chance there for other guys to get playing time to become "proven" in a very good situation.  Adding Nicks would mean he doesn't not believe the players he has picked are capable of that or that the coaches he has picked are capable of developing them.  I just wonder which it is.

 

It probably means that Nicks as a proven player is a lot better than the ceiling of someone like LaVon Brazill. There is nothing wrong with making a signing that makes your team better. You can have Nicks, who has made the Pro Bowl and been a solid #1WR when he has been healthy or hasn't had a QB who threw 30 INT's in a season or LaVon Brazill who has 23 Rec's in his career. Who do you want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if none of them showed they would be fine if Reggie went down or doesn't return to form, then he must not have faith that they can develop or or does not have faith the coaches can develop them.

No, it means that he's not going to put all his eggs in their baskets without some sort of contingency plan. Nicks is the contingency plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he may want to play on a team with a top defense.

Being a #2 on a pass heavy team in a weak conference is better for his potential future earnings then being a #1 on a run-first team playing against some of the best defenses in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not true in our favor right?

Right.  The Colts could offer Mack a 5 year $5 million contract and if he accepted it then the Browns would have a chance to match, if they did not match it, then the Colts would sign Mack for that contract.  Now, the likely hood of that happening is next to nill.  But the Colts(or any team) could do a 5 years, 40 million contract with $15 million guaranteed in 2014 and 10 million guaranteed in 2015, still be less than $10 mill per year but it would be more beneficial for Mack than a one year contract guaranteed at $10 mil+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Says who? The O-Line has gotten significantly better already due to the fact that Satele and McGlynn won't be starting.

 

And our starters on the interior line next year, if nothing else is done will be a decent guard coming off a serious, season-ending injury, a 2nd year player coming off a rough rookie season and a center who is essentially a rookie who inspired so little faith last year that his coaches opted to slide a journeyman G/C over to start in place of Satele when he was hurt, rather than give him developmental playing time in Satele's absence... I feel REAL secure about that going into next season. How about you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And our starters on the interior line next year, if nothing else is done will be a decent guard coming off a serious, season-ending injury, a 2nd year player coming off a rough rookie season and a center who is essentially a rookie who inspired so little faith last year that his coaches opted to slide a journeyman G/C over to start in place of Satele when he was hurt, rather than give him developmental playing time in Satele's absence... I feel REAL secure about that going into next season. How about you?

Do you really, I mean really believe this will be the case? I'm sure Grigson values his job better than you give him credit for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...