Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Cut Hasselbeck?

COLTSFAN12to13

By COLTSFAN12to13,
in Colts Football

 Share Followers 1

Recommended Posts

Blue-Fence

Blue-Fence 0

Posted
Posted

Hasselbeck gets $3.6 million a year to mentor Luck (which he was constantly doing in training camp) and to keep the Colts from total disaster should Luck go down.  Hasselbeck is still a smart and accurate QB. 

 

Any other QBs out there for less money and a low interception %% ? I think not.    

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jay Kirk

Jay Kirk 3,329

Posted
Posted

He (Harnish) threw short-hops all of last preseason.  I was surprised he hung with us.  He was very Painter-esque.

 

I am ready for a new third string.....

 

No on Hasselbeck.....he shalt retire here.

Lol Hass is a steal at 2.25 mil or whatever IMO ,he could make the offense function if called upon.Im also with you on the third string ,theres got to be someone to develop out there ,who better than Hass to help it along !

Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

Lol Hass is a steal at 2.25 mil or whatever IMO ,he could make the offense function if called upon.Im also with you on the third string ,theres got to be someone to develop out there ,who better than Hass to help it along !

I want the big kid from VA Tech.....Culpepper size.....could actually end up a TE at some point.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1691193/logan-thomas

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jay Kirk

Jay Kirk 3,329

Posted
Posted

I want the big kid from VA Tech.....Culpepper size.....could actually end up a TE at some point.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1691193/logan-thomas

Like this one Brother ,footwork seems to be the biggest hurdle ,and we know footwork can be taught.Even the most desired QBs coming out of college have footwork issues to work on.Some of his characteristics sound strangely familiar to me . :spit: Great choice ! Actually he could be a Lucky young man.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

Like this one Brother ,footwork seems to be the biggest hurdle ,and we know footwork can be taught.Even the most desired QBs coming out of college have footwork issues to work on.Some of his characteristics sound strangely familiar to me . :spit: Great choice ! Actually he could be a Lucky young man.

A later choice, but just someone I really like.  I think we need to develop a number 2 QB for the future...see how it goes.  Fleener or Allen gets hurt (Aleen has been hurt) he may be a Jimmy Graham/Marcus Pollard basketball TE conversion.

 

You and I both saw Pollard play basketball at Bradley...back in the day :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jay Kirk

Jay Kirk 3,329

Posted
Posted

A later choice, but just someone I really like.  I think we need to develop a number 2 QB for the future...see how it goes.  Fleener or Allen gets hurt (Aleen has been hurt) he may be a Jimmy Graham/Marcus Pollard basketball TE conversion.

 

You and I both saw Pollard play basketball at Bradley...back in the day :)

Yes and he was very good at it ,kinda reminded me as a poor mans David West . :thmsup:

Link to post
Share on other sites
ColtsBlueFL

ColtsBlueFL 4,394

Posted
Posted

I'd rather not have the 2.25 mil and have a quarterback who has played in the superbowl, for a backup.

 

Exactly!  What, exactly, would that 2.25 mil buy that takes us over the top?  I'd rather pay 3.75 mil to have MH finish his second year rather than cut him, have 1.5 mil in dead money, C. Harnisch as backup QB, and an extra 2,25 million in cap space. Moving on...

Link to post
Share on other sites
ProblChld32

ProblChld32 282

Posted
Posted

No no no no, it may save Cap space, but if Luck for what ever reason went down would you put all your trust in Harnish an unproven QB who has very little snaps under Center in the NFL. Or Hasselback who has Tons of Experience and still is a more than capable QB? not to mention he provides luck with Guidance, Wisdom, and Understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thewholefnshow28

Thewholefnshow28 13

Posted
Posted

Not only is Hasselbeck still a capable QB (who can play if ever needed), but he provides outstanding insight for Luck.

 

They WILL NOT cut him. 

 

I am guessing some fans have learned nothing from the Peyton era. 

 

Do we really want to go back to a point where the moment Luck goes down we might as well stop tuning in as the season is over?  Matt is a capaable back up that would give us a chance every week if the worse case scenario happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites
schwamm

schwamm 41

Posted
Posted

He's ok, but overpaid and could easily be replaced

Uninformed drivel.

You are clinging to nonsense spewed on the forum last year as if it had some shred of truth, and ignoring what actually happened on the field since then. Was he perfect? No. Did he make mistakes, especially early in the season? Yes. Did he look pretty stupid in that head butting incident? Yes.

However,... He was pretty consistent, and mostly played pretty well. He will also likely continue to improve with a full year on the team.

His salary was consistent with what his position and level of play would dictate. He was not overpaid, and could very easily become a real bargain with only minimal improvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

Good news for you Walterfootball says that we interviewed him at the combine.  

This kid intrigues me.....good arm....the athleticism is uncanny.  Have him learn with Hasselbeck for two years and get him 7th round..late 6th...or UFA depending...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Valpo2004

Valpo2004 1,573

Posted
Posted

This kid intrigues me.....good arm....the athleticism is uncanny.  Have him learn with Hasselbeck for two years and get him 7th round..late 6th...or UFA depending...

 

1 year.  Hasselbeck only has a year left on his contract.  

 

All I heard about Logan Thomas is that he has all the physical tools but his play was wildly inconsistent.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

1 year.  Hasselbeck only has a year left on his contract.  

 

All I heard about Logan Thomas is that he has all the physical tools but his play was wildly inconsistent.  

RAW talent....I feel the kind of player Grigs brings in.

 

I watched Montori Huges last year and noted him as a Grigs guy.....Logan Thomas is as well. (See Adongo and McNary)

 

My bad on Mat H....need to utilize his mind for a new QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1yrdandacloudofdust

1yrdandacloudofdust 0

Posted
Posted

Uninformed drivel.

You are clinging to nonsense spewed on the forum last year as if it had some shred of truth, and ignoring what actually happened on the field since then. Was he perfect? No. Did he make mistakes, especially early in the season? Yes. Did he look pretty stupid in that head butting incident? Yes.

However,... He was pretty consistent, and mostly played pretty well. He will also likely continue to improve with a full year on the team.

His salary was consistent with what his position and level of play would dictate. He was not overpaid, and could very easily become a real bargain with only minimal improvement.

Dude, he doea nothing that cant be replaced by a rookie. He's not some game changer that is hard to replace.

Link to post
Share on other sites
schwamm

schwamm 41

Posted
Posted

Dude, he doea nothing that cant be replaced by a rookie. He's not some game changer that is hard to replace.

Dude, you got nothing that can't be replaced by a five year old's ability to observe and comment on the game.

I'm not claiming he is a game changer. Never did. But not everyone on the roster can or should be (not under a cap system). Walden is an effective role player, and he got paid about what others at his position and effectiveness are getting paid. Acquiring him last year was a solid and unheralded move by Grigson, and I expect him to be a very valuable piece on D this next season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1yrdandacloudofdust

1yrdandacloudofdust 0

Posted
Posted

Dude, you got nothing that can't be replaced by a five year old's ability to observe and comment on the game.

I'm not claiming he is a game changer. Never did. But not everyone on the roster can or should be (not under a cap system). Walden is an effective role player, and he got paid about what others at his position and effectiveness are getting paid. Acquiring him last year was a solid and unheralded move by Grigson, and I expect him to be a very valuable piece on D this next season.

U sound angry, calm thy self. And Walden sux

Link to post
Share on other sites
colts 101

colts 101 1

Posted
Posted

Harnish is horrible, probably worse than Curtis Painter. If we ever lose Luck, we're in big trouble anyway.

Keep in mind we have never seen Harnish play except with receivers and an O line that would soon be returning home to resume their pizza delivery jobs.  Wish we could see him play with starters for a better analysis.

Link to post
Share on other sites
pgt_rob

pgt_rob 709

Posted
Posted

Keep in mind we have never seen Harnish play except with receivers and an O line that would soon be returning home to resume their pizza delivery jobs.  Wish we could see him play with starters for a better analysis.

 

He felt the pressure from 2nd and 3rd string defense. Keep that in mind. haha

Link to post
Share on other sites
Shive

Shive 1,989

Posted
Posted

This kid intrigues me.....good arm....the athleticism is uncanny. Have him learn with Hasselbeck for two years and get him 7th round..late 6th...or UFA depending...

Too many years of being incredibly inconsistent at VT and causing me nothing but frustration. When he's leading your favorite college team, it gives a bit more insight and I wouldn't care to bring him in. Just a rawer Kaep..
Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

Too many years of being incredibly inconsistent at VT and causing me nothing but frustration. When he's leading your favorite college team, it gives a bit more insight and I wouldn't care to bring him in. Just a rawer Kaep..

OK....do you think it is an OK idea to mould him?  He to me is a bigger and better than Harnish.  We can afford to wait with him.  If not TE.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Shive

Shive 1,989

Posted
Posted

OK....do you think it is an OK idea to mould him? He to me is a bigger and better than Harnish. We can afford to wait with him. If not TE.

As long as we don't waste a draft pick on him. He has awesome physical tools, but I don't think he reads the field well, has choppy footwork, and would be a huge project. More upside than Harnish? Absolutely, but that's not saying much. As a TE, I don't think the time needed to mold him into a capable NFL player would be worth it. Who's the last college QB converted to WR or TE that was mildly successful? Matt Jones?
Link to post
Share on other sites
rittdk01

rittdk01 0

Posted
Posted

This was brought up last offseason.  Harnish didn't even look close to Hasselbeck in training camp practices and really showed he's not in the same league during preseason games.  They would have to get rid of Hasselbeck and pay someone else that salary to take his place cause Harnish isn't leaving the practice squad. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
BrentMc11

BrentMc11 633

Posted
Posted

As long as we don't waste a draft pick on him. He has awesome physical tools, but I don't think he reads the field well, has choppy footwork, and would be a huge project. More upside than Harnish? Absolutely, but that's not saying much. As a TE, I don't think the time needed to mold him into a capable NFL player would be worth it. Who's the last college QB converted to WR or TE that was mildly successful? Matt Jones?

Thanks for the reply.  With you seeing him I value your opinion.  All I have seen is clips and some game highlights.  I still like him late or UFA...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Shive

Shive 1,989

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the reply. With you seeing him I value your opinion. All I have seen is clips and some game highlights. I still like him late or UFA...

We definitely need an upgrade over Harnish soon. We don't have Hasselbeck for much longer..
Link to post
Share on other sites
southwest1

southwest1 2,092

Posted
Posted

He (Harnish) threw short-hops all of last preseason.  I was surprised he hung with us.  He was very Painter-esque.

 

I am ready for a new third string.....

 

No on Hasselbeck.....he shalt retire here.

Amen Brent Amen! I know I always say this, but it bears repeating: Matthew got robbed in the 2005 SB & I want him to win a Championship this year. Harnish is not the answer if Luck goes down. You need a proven commodity in Hasselbeck. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
thedude

thedude 0

Posted
Posted

Cutting our backup QB Matt Hasselbeck would save us 2.25 million dollars. Would this be a smart idea? Is Harnish a good enough backup to Luck? 

 

I'm not sure we should cut Hasselbeck but honestly i could see it happening, would allow us more flexibility on the open market.

Not a good idea. Quality back up QB's don't seem important to some until they find out too late that they don't have one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BlueShoe

BlueShoe 544

Posted
Posted

Cutting our backup QB Matt Hasselbeck would save us 2.25 million dollars. Would this be a smart idea? Is Harnish a good enough backup to Luck? 

 

I'm not sure we should cut Hasselbeck but honestly i could see it happening, would allow us more flexibility on the open market. 

 

I will get straight to the point - NO! :)

 

If we had to have MH win us a few games then I would feel comfortable. If we had to have Harnish win us a few games then chalk those games up as losses. 

 

I would feel more comfortable with cutting Harnish altogether and getting a new backup to groom in 2015.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 1
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • stitches
      NFLN's Chad Reuter's 4-Round Mock Draft....

      By stitches · Posted

      I wouldn't mind that... especially if you can get Cosmi in the second(I doubt it)... solid mock for us. I usually don't like Reuters' mocks but this one I can be happy with. 
    • stitches
      One issue about Free Agency has caught my eye....

      By stitches · Posted

      The only thing I would say is - I'm not sure if they take it into account. It's possible they do and their numbers still come out like this... no idea.    I really really want to see what happens IRL though. Is the low and midmarket the only ones that get affected or will the top FAs suffer some depressed market too? No idea... but if the top of the market suffers, I wouldn't mind it if we actually spend big now and do it long-term so we can use the current lower pricetag in future years when the cap will normalize. 
    • jskinnz
      NFLN's Chad Reuter's 4-Round Mock Draft....

      By jskinnz · Posted

      Your evidence asserting this notion is, well, underwhelming. 
    • w87r
      Capologist Thread (Salary Cap questions/answers)

      By w87r · Posted

      Just to add a little to this.     These are the negative consequences, you end up in bad salary cap shape and have to release/trade key players or restructure and continue to further damage your future cap space situation to get out of it.   Sometimes it pays off with SB title, most times it doesn't.
    • stitches
      Somebody explain the Carl Lawson hype

      By stitches · Posted

      While I agree with @Supermanthat his skillset doesn't lend itself to finishing, I think disruption on its own is worth something and he does provide disruption. He would probably be our best EDGE player if we signed him. He's a bit like Trey Flowers, but the player he reminds me more of is actually Brandon Graham. They are very similar to me and are similarly disruptive without having great finishing ability. They also are similar body type and length-wise(namely short). They both lack elite bend and closing speed, but have some speed and speed to power element combined with solid technical ability.    The length BTW is one reason I kind of feel like excludes us from the discussion on Lawson. Ballard loves long athletes on defense. Just look at the players he's drafting and signing.    Basham - 34 1/4"  Turay - 33 3/8" Lewis - 33 6/8" Banagu 33 5/8"    Lawson is on the other end of the spectrum = 31 4/8"    If we got Lawson he would be not just the shortest DL Ballard has taken, but also shorter than even the CB's threshold Ballard seems to be following.    Either way... I wouldn't mind Lawson on the Colts, I just hope we don't break the bank for him. 

  • Members

    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 696

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 5,040

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,060

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 1,581

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 805

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Holden89

      Holden89 113

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 34

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 2,278

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mrfox

      Mrfox 5

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...