Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ReMeDy

Rob Ryan Says 'my Chance Will Come' As Head Coach In Nfl

Recommended Posts

Those numbers are phenomenal from a Colts perspective. I'd love to have the 4th ranked rushing defense in the league.

Here are the Colts:

OFFENSE

15.1 pts (30th)

294.9 yds (30th)

192.8 pass yds (27th)

102.1 rush yds (22nd)

DEFENSE

31.5 pts (32nd)

402.9 yds (31st)

258.9 pass yds (22nd)

144.0 rush yds (31st)

We cannot do anything on the field. Rob Ryan would unquestionably make our team better. By how much is uncertain, but it cannot get any worse than what we have now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob Ryan likes to run the 3-4 and we don't have the personnel for it here. I don't think he will be our next head coach

maybe we do. nevis or aj can play NT. freeney and mathis stay at end. connor moves inside with angerer and wheeler and sims on the outside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob Ryan likes to run the 3-4 and we don't have the personnel for it here. I don't think he will be our next head coach

We don't have the personnel to execute the crappy Tampa 2, either! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he ran a 4-3 in Cleveland. So its not like the 3-4 is a must if he where to come. If he where to come id like to see him run a bit of both. We don't have the personnel to run a base 3-4, but we do for the 4-3 (obviously). Personally im tired of the "This is what where gunna do, try and beat us" mentality the colts have had in who knows how long now. Because bottom line is...they do know what where gunna do, and they will beat us. Its time we upgraded to the 2000s here. Move Freeney around, stand him up, put him and Mathis on 1 side, i don't care but this same look defense is old, exposed and useless. Offenses are simply to good at this day in age. We got talent on that side of the ball but when the offense knows where everyone is going to be its easy. So im all for bringing in Rob Ryan, plus he has got Mr. Bradys number, which only helps his cause.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he ran a 4-3 in Cleveland. So its not like the 3-4 is a must if he where to come. If he where to come id like to see him run a bit of both. We don't have the personnel to run a base 3-4, but we do for the 4-3 (obviously). Personally im tired of the "This is what where gunna do, try and beat us" mentality the colts have had in who knows how long now. Because bottom line is...they do know what where gunna do, and they will beat us. Its time we upgraded to the 2000s here. Move Freeney around, stand him up, put him and Mathis on 1 side, i don't care but this same look defense is old, exposed and useless. Offenses are simply to good at this day in age. We got talent on that side of the ball but when the offense knows where everyone is going to be its easy. So im all for bringing in Rob Ryan, plus he has got Mr. Bradys number, which only helps his cause.

I thought he ran the 3-4 in Cleveland (with big Shaun Rogers), but they converted to a 4-3 this year (thus the release of Rogers). I could be wrong though.

PS. how about them Blue Bombers? Swaggerville

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he ran the 3-4 in Cleveland (with big Shaun Rogers), but they converted to a 4-3 this year (thus the release of Rogers). I could be wrong though.

PS. how about them Blue Bombers? Swaggerville

I think the Cleveland defense was primarily a 3-4, though they used several different alignments. Here's an article I found that showed some of the different alignments he's used both with Cleveland and Dallas. I like the variety and I also like that at one time or another he's been position coach for the the DL, LB and DBs as well as obviously having been DC. Not many DCs have been position coaches for each defensive group prior to moving up to DC...typically they specialize in one area.

http://dallascowboystimes.com/2011/02/rob-ryans-defensive-fronts-the-46-psycho-and-cloud/

I like the Ryans and I definitely think Rob will get his chance as HC sooner rather than later and I'd have no problem at all with that being with the Colts. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He certainly knows a lot about the game, I'm just hoping he keeps his mouth shut when he comes here. I don't want to hear about how "Andre Johnson would be the third best receiver on the Colts" or any of that. Just coach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A cupboard would be better coach than Caldwell, so giving a chance to anyone with eyes and hands doesn't sound really bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 vote for Peyton Manning fathead for coach over caldwell. Below that any living being can take the sopt and I'd be happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah...there is good dialogue and debate here. Over there...not really...the mere critique of JB or Ballard will get you downvoted into oblivion. 
    • I think if the Texans lose any other games (in addition to the NE game)...and the Colts run the table...the Colts will have the tiebreaker...either through division record or common games. But barring that...the Colts will be playing for the WC.
    • You don't spare resources for a QB IMO. If you love a player and think he can be your franchise QB, you trade up to get him. I don't know if Ballard loves any of the QBs, I don't know if he's watching them even right now, but yeah... this is my position - we have some good picks in excess of our own to use to trade up. Go get the QB you love. 
    • I'm not a proponent that Hooker is an elite all around FS.  His eliteness is simply one dimensional, which isn't enough to warrant a huge capital investment, IMO.   But in his defense, it seemed to me the scheme being played did not have him always covering the deep ball.  The first TD looks like it may have been a whiff, it happens, but the other times it looked like there was no intention to give the CB over the top FS help.  Which is a scheme problem.      On the first TD, it looks like Hooker was supposed to turn and run with Hopkins, which is a recognition problem and a man-coverage issue (he's a deep ball hawk, not a skilled man-coverer.)   If Hooker was truly out of position on those deep throws, it was really, really, bad play because he was not even in the picture and in no position to contest the long completion.   Overall, I think the corners had decent coverage.  I think the safety play and/or scheme let them down.
  • Members

    • Khoops

      Khoops 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,154

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 318

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JR Indy

      JR Indy 75

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,982

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 3,308

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • adubb84

      adubb84 251

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Brazilian Ninja

      The Brazilian Ninja 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 541

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 35,434

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...