Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Denver's o-line made three critical mistakes early, hurting Denver's momentum throughout.


ReMeDy

Recommended Posts

Center:

This is the obvious one. Manny Ramirez's bad snap to Manning resulting in the early safety. It placed an ominous cloud over the entire Bronco's offense.

 

"The Broncos were supposed to snap on Manning's shouted cadence but no one upfront heard him. As Manning stepped up, center Manny Ramirez heaved the snap past Manning. 'I thought I heard him,' Ramirez said."

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_25048459/broncos-peyton-manning-super-bowl-blowout-seahawks

 

I hate to say, but I believe Ramirez will get some death threats over this. That's the nature of this league on the world's biggest stage when tons of money is on the line.

 

Left Guard:

Horrible and obvious tripping penalty. Zane Beadle sticks his leg out so far, it looks like he's doing splits. It's as if he didn't trust Manning to elude the pressure, so Beadle played his trump card. On the following 3rd & 13, Seattle DE, Cliff Avril, blows past Right Tackle Orlando Franklin and hits Manning in the arm as he attempted to throw. The batted ball hung in the air. Seahawks linebacker Malcom Smith — the game's MVP — made a break on the ball, snagged it, and scored a 69yd INT touchdown.

Right Guard:

Horrible false start penalty on 3rd & 4, resulting in a 3rd & 9. Manning made a 5yd'ish completion that would have been a first down without the penalty. Denver then goes for it on 4th down and fails. That 4th down decision wouldn't have happened without the penalty. Huge momentum shift. You can't have false starts on 3rd & short.

 

This was the trifecta of mistakes early compounding the Bronco's chemistry issues: The bad snap from the Center, the tripping by the LG, and the false start by the RG. You can place a bit of blame on several issues, but it was these three stooges on the o-line who ultimately blew it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense wins championships, and that defense destroyed Denver's offense.

 

100% the truth.

 

Here is the cold hard fact - the Denver D had not generated a SINGLE turnover vs Rivers or Brady. Nada. Zilch.

 

So, their plan is to hope Peyton will dominate time of possession vs Seahawks like he did vs the Chargers and Patriots and THERE WAS NO PLAN B. That D was not going to blitz, be aggressive and have playmakers to generate field position with turnovers to generate scoring.

 

It was all in with Peyton. Peyton and the offense struggles, the deck of cards comes tumbling down. No plan B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% the truth.

 

Here is the cold hard fact - the Denver D had not generated a SINGLE turnover vs Rivers or Brady. Nada. Zilch.

 

So, their plan is to hope Peyton will dominate time of possession vs Seahawks like he did vs the Chargers and Patriots and THERE WAS NO PLAN B. That D was not going to blitz, be aggressive and have playmakers to generate field position with turnovers to generate scoring.

 

It was all in with Peyton. Peyton and the offense struggles, the deck of cards comes tumbling down. No plan B.

 

 

Seattle's defense is one of the very best I have ever seen. I know I ragged on them all year long, but I have to give them credit. They have manhandled every great QB they've played. Only divisional opponents that know them well like St Lous, SF, and Arizona really gave them fits.

 

 

The way Denver's offense came out playing, i don't think they expected Seattle to play as aggressive. They ran those same plays all year long and it worked out very nicely against the worst defenses in the league, but up against the juggernauts they had no answer.

 

 

Reminds me of the Super Bowl though the Saints won. All we heard about was don't blitz and how the blitz was not going to work against him, and the Saints came out and were blitzing him hard and putting him on the ground and what do you know; pick 6 happens on a blitz. The Seahawks did the same thing, they applied pressure and were blitzing and it totally threw him off.

 

 

Manning is a great quarterback but he does not thrive under pressure by any means. The Saints proved it, the Seahawks totally destroyed him tonight with pressure, hell even Pittsburgh back in '05 showed that he was not invincible against a great blitz. Brett Favre had this same issue his entire career. If you go through a lot of Favre's big playoff loses, most the time he was getting banged around hard. When Favre said that Manning was closest thing to him, he wasn't lying.

 

 

Denver played one of the weakest schedules of the entire season. The toughest defenses they played were NE and KC, and neither one of them are as physical or disciplined as the Seahawks. K.C. on one hand is extremely overrated, cause the minute they started playing tougher teams, it was like they ran into a brick wall. They couldn't even hold a 28 point lead over the Colts, and that defense looked pathetic against better teams. NE was banged up all year long and we all know how bad they look in times.

The main reason Denver got all those records and stats is because their schedule was so weak. They had no idea what they were going up against tonight and they were totally dominated.

 

 

 

The Seahawks were ready to play Denver cause they had just crushed a great Saints team (whom I truly believe would have beat Denver tonight) and an even better 49ers team. They didn't play cupcakes all year long (even though I said they did). They played some great teams and were ready for the Broncos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offensive line was pretty bad, but also, Manning made some horrendous decisions too. 

 

He knows he's going to get hit, his arm as well, and he decides that he wants to fling it down the field. He was not smart in this game. 

 

He was also not in sync as well. 

 

The irony is, the offense that carried them all season, failed them in this game. The defense only allowed 29 points, which considering all the things that happened (bad field position, picks, great ST play from the Seahawks) is not that bad. It's the OFFENSE that failed them, and that offense starts with Peyton Manning. My favorite player of all time, but I won't shy away from saying he was a bust in this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Seahawks played the Broncos WRs the same way the Colts' DBs played them. Tackle them well, little to no YAC, dare Peyton to go deep where they can recover with their length and force him to be exceptionally accurate. Even Pagano referred to that at the Pro Bowl saying that Peyton will make his plays but you have to limit their YAC, which is what the Colts did vs Peyton.

 

Peyton just kept throwing underneath, DT ran east west more than north south on critical occasions, Seahawks DBs played tight, clocked them WRs on the short routes and the Broncos never adapted or took shots as much earlier. None of the shots they took had much of a chance of success either, IMO. Peyton had a sub-par game. He actually had a better game vs the Saints in 2009 than this.

 

I remember when the Seahawks game happened in Indy, Andrew Luck said that we have to stay aggressive and take shots down the field to negate the Seahawks' defensive aggression. That is how the colts won with Luck's shots deep to T.Y. when those guys played single high safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bad analogy.  These rankings come out and can change week to week.  That’s why they do it.  No one scores elite grades every week.  They are number one right now.  The season just started.  Why is that so hard to understand?  I swear.
    • Yes, but the element of Richardson running more in the latter quarter also contributed to the Colts ability to run it with success
    • Totally agree. Now if Richardson is like throwing below 50% by the end of the season. Then maybe we have a case to worry. I really compare his career to Allen and I think of Richardson as an  Allen on steroids lol. They have very similar physical makeups but Richardson may have a stronger arm and is much faster. Allan has him in the build department.  Allan's rookie season was really rocky and if you look back. It really almost took 2 years till you started to see it. I just think fans need to be very patient as I think Richardson was even more raw than Allen coming out. You see the rawness but I also see the composure and making some good reasons. Yes, he throws picks but all rookie qbs do. Hell, I remember even Luck making the most ridiculous throws that resulted in interceptions. Just sit back and get your popcorn as this is going to be like a roller coaster. I really thought when people said playoffs. I was like.................really??
    • The Bears knew exactly what the Colts were going to do on their last drive.   That's what my post was was about.   Maybe you quoted the wrong post?
    • They are playing a sub par qb, Oline and a running game that averages like 4 yards.  The Bears actually scared me more on offense because at least they have the potential to break it open. Fields is a bad qb (passer) and just keep him in the pocket and make him play qb. Keep everything inside and the defense should be successful. Turnovers and field position is going to be huge in this game. No going for it on 4th down and punt the ball. I think this is going to be an ugly game lol.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...