Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Do We Have The Proper Players To Play 3-4 Defense?


Captain Americolt

Recommended Posts

I am not here to rant about how horrible the defense is. We all have eyes and can see for ourselves. This is just for fun and curiosity. It may seem like we have not even one proper player for a 3-4 defense, but I think we could find a way(if we ever decide too)

Heres my view of how things could go.

OLB- Philip Wheeler (considered one of the nations best blitzing linebacker when coming out of college)

ILB- Pat Angerer

ILB- Maybe we draft vontaze burfict or manti te'o

OLB- Jerry Hughes (He's small for a DE. His speed and pass rush ablilties could make him a great rush olb)

DE- Dwight Freeney (and i'll explain why later)

NT- Drake Nevis (Also ill explain why later..)

DE- Robert Mathis

For Freeney people would think he's too small for a 3-4 DE and that he'll probably be double teamed. That would leave Nevis and Mathis one-on-one. You don't always have to be a 350+ pound monster to be considered a good NT (just look at Jay Ratliff). Nevis should most likely win his one-on-one matchup and provide constant pressure on the QB (along with Mathis who should also win his matchup). By the time teams realize it, Nevis and Mathis will be all over the QB along with wheeler and hughes when we send out blitz packages. Teams would have to decide whether to double team freeney, nevis, or Mathis.

This is all also based on pure speculation we will draft a CB who can become an immediate starter and upgrade for our secondary to play opposite of powers.

Anything but the tampa-2 would be great. I'm also not saying the 3-4 is the answer. I just think this is an interesting topic considering our defensive play this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have the right linebacking core to play 3-4, but the defensive line is not right. None of our DTs are big enough or dominant enough to play it, and Freeney/Mathis have never played in a 3-4, but it shouldn't be a huge change. I was opposed to Hughes playing OLB, but seeing Mario Williams make a nice transition, I thought that maybe he would be good there. It's a very interesting idea, but I don't Larry Coyer would make the swtich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly did you even read it? I put some things in BOLD just for people like you.

Again I say, "For the love of God, can we stop talking about changing to a 3-4? We need a sticky about the infeasibility of the endeavor along with the misconceptions associated with having a 3-4 versus a 4-3."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bin saying it

3-4

de- nevis

nt- draft

de- moala

rolb- freeney

will- wheeler or conner

ilb- angerer

lolb- hughes and trade mathis for picks or keep him in 4-3 hybrids

ss- lefeged

fs- bethea

cb- powers

cb- thomas

cb- rucker

with power in the nickel on three wideout plays 5'10"

and thomas 6'0" and rucker 6'1" on the out sides

that looks ok on paper if we had a guy like rob ryan or bill cower, bill parcels.. etc to teach it even romeo .c

Edited by jbaron04
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could pick-up Pat Williams and him and Johnson could be our nose tackles. We could have a line-up of Nevis/Williams/Anderson up front spelled by Brayton/Johnson/Matthews with Freeney at ROLB rushing 90 percent of the time. Conner and Angerer could play inside and Hughes could play LOLB blitzing about 60 percent of downs. Wheeler could spell either of the rush ends, and we would need a couple of physical corners on the outside who can effectively jam guys at the line (I'm thinking a Ty Law lite could do well).Safety we could field Lefeged and Bethea with Caldwell adding depth. We could rotate Angerer or Conner on obvious passing downs for a decent nickelback like Powers.

So all we really need is a true NFL starting NT, and two physical corners that can jam the outside, and we could be set. That's three players. It's possible we could and should make this switch this year while the season is toast. In the modern NFL, the 3-4 is more capable of stopping the record setting passing that is going on. This is just my opinion. Obviously we still have Mathis so we could put him at LOLB, if he would be willing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fool? Nevis never played DE. Moala was atrocious at DE in college. Freeney will NOT play rolb. We're not going to trade mathis. Rucker is solid depth but no starter. Same as thomas. The whole thing looks like a toddler wrote it on paper.....

Just because Nevis never played DE doesn't mean he couldn't in a 3-4. No one really knows. This is all just hypothetical opinions.

Edited by BobbyMorris94
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fool? Nevis never played DE. Moala was atrocious at DE in college. Freeney will NOT play rolb. We're not going to trade mathis. Rucker is solid depth but no starter. Same as thomas. The whole thing looks like a toddler wrote it on paper.....

first off i know we wouldnt do it, it was an idea and i never said rucker was a starter and thomas played one game against the saints give him a chance

also we all our just fooling around with the idea and our current roster also if i remember right was moala the anchor to usc leading to ray malauga, clay mathews, and brain cushing

so get your facts right and also\

3-4 de our normal 290 pound guys like undersize dt nevis is at 300 ,294 all the have to do is hold there assignment get your fact right and dont kill people for just joking were 0-7 not to much to talk bout these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nevis is a 3-4 NT if he's in a 3-4. He doesn't have the length to play the outside, they there have been similar size DEs. I think he's got the strength and quickness to have some success at NT in the 3-4. There has been a new breed of 3-4 NTs for sometime. Jay Ratliff, Shaun Cody, Barry Cofield, and Kelly Gregg are all starters and decent ones at that. In fact, if Nevis is like any player, it's a more athletic Kelly Gregg. It took Gregg sometime to get to 320, and I think Nevis would likely look to play closer to 310. But the NT needs to be either big enough to demand two blockers or quick enough to get under the center and disrupt plays before they develop. I think he has the strength and leverage to hold up against the double team with a bit more size. Regardless of scheme, you typically want anyone playing the 5 tech to have a bit more length. My biggest issue with Nevis playing in the 3-4, however, is that I don't know that he's ever had two gap responsibility. It's a big change for a guy who has made most of his impact by shooting gaps. Anderson is the only guy I think that looks almost custom built for the 3-4. Brayton does, but he's failed there before. Moala might be, as he was solid enough there in college. 3-4 linemen are typically thankless fellas, so I think it's an injustice to say he sucked there. Alot of 3-4 DL are responsible for filling up the gaps and keeping the linebackers nose clean, and I'm not sure the Colts have the guys to do that right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....Mathis as a 3-4 DE....sorry, but that's like putting Freeney at safety. Mathis would be a 3-4 rush OLB easily. As a 3-4 end mathis would get swallowed up easily and be ineffective. Freeney is a reach at 3-4 DE by a mile, because of his dimensions. Like Mathis, he would be suited alot better at OLB and be much more effective there. Brackett or Connor would be the other ILB. Hughes and Wheeler would be the backup OLBs. Antonio Johnson would be a better option starting at NT, but Nevis could make a good backup and a nice rotation at NT. Jamaal Anderson, Fili Moala and Tyler Brayton would make good 3-4 DEs. They have the size/length and are pretty good at stopping the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started a thread about this earlier in the NFL draft section:

http://forums.colts....ild-in-2-years/

I concur with Blackhawk4 above:

OLBs: Mathis & Freeney with Hughes & Wheeler the backup OLBs

DEs: Moala, Anderson for now, Brayton as backup, draft one more DE

NT: Nevis as pass down NT like a Jay Ratliff and AJ can be in the rotation too, draft one big NT

ILB: We really have no one there, everyone we have is a bit too small for the ILB position, IMO, Conner can be back up ILB, maybe, draft one ILB

CB: Need two man corners drafted

Safeties: We have the speedy safeties we need, IMO

So, technically, we need about 5 players drafted with the NT and ILB being the most important, then the 2 man corners and DE to move our 4-3 to a 3-4. Wade Philips just showed with the Texans that with the right coach and the right players drafted, you can transition much faster. It may require us to play free agency more to move to a 3-4 for a few spots. It took the Packers 2 years, it took the Texans 1 year, it is not as tough as people make it to be. Having said that, just by hiring a different 4-3 DC like a Steve Spags, our D would get several notches better since most of the personnel is in place and if we draft an NT and a couple of man corners, our D can get to a much better level with the 4-3.

Edited by chad72
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I say, "For the love of God, can we stop talking about changing to a 3-4? We need a sticky about the infeasibility of the endeavor along with the misconceptions associated with having a 3-4 versus a 4-3."

Again I say, "For the Love of God, can we START talking about changing to a 3-4? We DO need a sticky about the FEASIBILITY of the endeavor along with the POSITIVE FACTS associated with having a 3-4 versus a 4-3."

There we go all better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I say, "For the Love of God, can we START talking about changing to a 3-4? We DO need a sticky about the FEASIBILITY of the endeavor along with the POSITIVE FACTS associated with having a 3-4 versus a 4-3."

There we go all better. 

As soon as a team puts 3 WR's on the field 3-4 teams switch to 4-3. So, then you are just playing 4-3 with a "move-around" pass rusher or two. If a 3-4 is better than our 4-3 it's due to the difference in talent rather than the scheme. If the Colts committed to spending draft picks on better, more versatile defensive talent, the defense would be as good as any 3-4.

Edited by GoGoColts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did want to put mathis at olb but i wanted hughes to be a starter :P. Just being picky. Though i do still think freeney would still be ok at DE

He doesn't have the build of a DE. He wouldn't be in the best situation to rush the passer. He can drop weight and be a stand up OLB, but he's just flat out doesn't have the build to be a 3-4 DE. Angerer and Connor would make good ILBs. They don't have to be 260 ILBS, there are effective ILBS that are the same size as Angerer and Connor/

Edited by Blackhawk4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Who the "forum gms" said was injury prone and needed real competition or a good backup.
    • You have posted some dumb stuff over the years.   This nonsense puts you on @Yoshinator level.  You two should write a movie 
    • Going into tonight: 1. @2006Coltsbestever47-30 2. @John Hammonds45-32 3. @Yoshinator44-33 3. @Moe44-33 4. @Solid8443-34 4. @danlhart8743-34 5. @RollerColt42-35 5. @VikingsFanInChennai42-35 5. @Chrisaaron102342-35 5. @Matthew Gilbert42-35 6. @jvan197341-36 7. @Dingus McGirt39-38 8. @EasyE38-39 9. @coltsva30-47   @ChuggaBeeryou are 6-7 so far this week, @Solid84I got your Jags pick, @John Hammondsis 9-4 this week, he killed it. I am 7-6 so far. Any mistakes let me know.     
    • Denver might not have a good offense, but their defense got me 16 points in fantasy. I added Alec Pierce to fill in an empty spot. That was a last minute decision, and it worked. Maybe I'll make more decisions near the end.😀
    • It’s the whole secondary. Cross has played well but it’s not like he’s Derwin James out there. Also Blackmon hasn’t played well, but I’m not surprised. But this is the issue with the secondary:   JuJu Brents-2nd round pick Jaylon Jones- 7th round pick Nick Cross-3rd round pick Julian Blackmon-3rd round pick Rodney Thomas- 7the round pick Womack-5th round pick Chris Lammons- UDFA Trevor Denbow- UDFA    
  • Members

    • twfish

      twfish 2,115

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DavePSL

      DavePSL 142

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 4,475

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,782

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 14,377

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 7,798

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 43,131

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 335

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 5,162

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nevbot

      Nevbot 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...