Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

James

Who in the NFL is more handsome than Tom Brady?

Recommended Posts

Guest TeamLoloJones

Uuum, what? Tom is an excellent dancer

 

 5-tom-brady-dancing-gif.gif

 

;)

Man, if that doesn't bring him down a peg, nothing will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, if that doesn't bring him down a peg, nothing will.

So awful. The hair, the outfit, but especially the dancing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh come on guys, he's an NFL player

 

I'd put Adam Vinatieri up there for his movie star good looks

 

Lots of guys are good looking

Hummm.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember thinking Rohn Stark's wife was hot when I was a kid (so she must've found him attractive), & Dean Biasucci actually did some acting after his NFL days (so he must have some movie star good looks)...

So who says kickers can't bring it???

 

can't believe I actually posted in this thread...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peyton to me is good looking but in terms of a rock star who typically has some rough edges whether be a large nose (aka Pete Townsend) or whatever. I saw a video of him with a guitar one time and thought what a natural.

 

In fact Peyton reminds me of a Pete Townsend- tall and lanky.

 

think was   1970 stoneybrook University Gym , The Who ,Performing Tommy ,  sat 10 feet from Pete ,   i was still HS , and when he jumped and screamed my name is uncle Ernie in that high pitch & sound so loud I thought my eardrums would pop, Was quite a memorable moment 

 

Man so many great concerts those days at that GYM

 

doesnt look like Peyton to me but thats just my opinion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know about Tom Brady.

 

Wife said Peyton Manning is on her fantasy team.  :-P

 

She's not a Colt fan or even an NFL fan, but she thinks Peyton is good looking.

 

 

Peyton to me is good looking but in terms of a rock star who typically has some rough edges whether be a large nose (aka Pete Townsend) or whatever. I saw a video of him with a guitar one time and thought what a natural.

 

In fact Peyton reminds me of a Pete Townsend- tall and lanky.

 

 

First Brady thread where no mention of Peyton? crickets...

 

NOPE , check the times , just go to show u read to fast or simply  overlook   the Majestic  PEYTON  ( LOL )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a great thread. I do think Brady probably stands alone in the looks department but it also helps that he married a super model so it kind of plays into the looks thing. But as a male friend of mine told me several years when Brady was first dating Gisele, he would be dating super models even if he didn't play football. Some guys do have all the luck Rod Stewart.

 

His looks are also the number one reason that Suggs hates him and that makes me happy. ;)

Super models don't date insurance salesman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd take Brady's ex,  Bridget Moynahan over Giselle everyday of the week.

 

Looks aren't the only thing that Giselle is bringing to the table... she's going to have her billion dollar empire behind her as well within the next 5 years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks aren't the only thing that Giselle is bringing to the table... she's going to have her billion dollar empire behind her as well within the next 5 years.

well if money is the issue, why not give Oprah a call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks aren't the only thing that Giselle is bringing to the table... she's going to have her billion dollar empire behind her as well within the next 5 years.

Oh boy, now I can get a moat!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how this thread got started...nor why I even clicked on it...but can we start a cutiest cheerleader one just to kinda even out the hormones lol.

 

Brady is obviously a good looking guy...and I'm sure there are many others but none as prominant as Tom. I will say some of the stuff he wears and his hair styles can be a little to metro for me...my wife thinks he is very handsome but at his post-game interviews she will definately critic him if he gets to fashionie. She may be a bit biased as she has a thing for Peyton and I have no clue why...I don't think Peyton is very good looking at all...pretty avg but she finds him very "manly".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really all about protection in the pocket. 

 

(Stop me! Please!) 

The tuck rule.

 

Stop!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bahahahahaha haha:lol:

I saw this thread, just "knew" for sure that it was started by amfootball.

But NO :no: it was James :scratch: :hmm: too funny

:) By all rights.....

 

You are starting to worry me...

He's just making me incredibly uncomfortable actually. :peek: What a profoundly wierd thread.

 

Now I think the real question is Ashley or Gisele. I prefer to kill my zombies instead of let them hang on to me. I'll go with the Southern girl.

Ironically I'm not remotely attracted to either one of them, but in theory I'd prefer "yeh old college sweetheart who does charitable work and owns part of a sports franchise" over "frighteningly gaunt girl famous for standing around while wierd people take photos of her".  But I'll give them both credit for resisting the likes of a Jessica Simpson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think was   1970 stoneybrook University Gym , The Who ,Performing Tommy ,  sat 10 feet from Pete ,   i was still HS , and when he jumped and screamed my name is uncle Ernie in that high pitch & sound so loud I thought my eardrums would pop, Was quite a memorable moment 

 

Man so many great concerts those days at that GYM

 

doesnt look like Peyton to me but thats just my opinion

Good you got to see them in their prime. I still see them but of course only half is left.

I first saw them in 1969 doing Tommy. Also about 10' away. yeah and when he stepped up to the microphone and belted out with neck muscles stretching I went wow..never seen a singer doing harmony at that level. I was hooked from then on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True story (unless you want to call my wife a liar lol...and i won't) during college my wife was on spring break and a group of guys approached her and said their buddy wanted to talk to her...so she went over and said hi and talked to him a bit and he asked her to come hang out with them. She turned him down and they told her "he was going to be a big star...he is a good qb" but she left with her friends. She later finds out in a few years it was Eli. She didn't even know Peyton was his brother until she met me and I made her watch all the Colts games. I tease her because she could been married with 100's of millions living in NY and here she is with me in our middle class neighborhood. She said Eli was cute but he kinda stuttered and was nervous about his entourage.....however after she saw Peyton she said she would have went on a date with him.

 

I tease her how lucky I am to be dating the homecoming queen but it went to whole other level when I found out that story from her and her friends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

I prefer to discuss this one instead. Smoldering.

tom-brady-stetson-man.jpg

Is...is that Peewee Herman on his arm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought Peyton had the better looking wife:

 

 

Ashley-Manning-is-Peyton-Manning-wife-pi

 

 

 

Gisele without makeup is.....painfully average:

 

5880759916_b2ecf52a76.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my top 5: 

 

1. Decker

2. Brady

3. Keuchly

4. AP (very good looking for a black guy. no racist)

5. Brady Quinn

 

my gf thinks victor cruz, eli manning, miles austin, reggie bush, and mark sanchez are hot though. she only knows them cause of new york and cause bush and austin were with Kim K. Very surprised how many girls think Eli's attractive though. It's not the first time I've heard it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew women should have never been allowed to watch football.

Joke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh heck yeah.........

 

That's a good looking guy.

He was my pick too, Jules.   You and I have been agreeing way too much lately   :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because Gisele is hot and rich. Rare combo.

if you consider women with zero curves hot i guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew women should have never been allowed to watch football.

Joke

 

 

What can I say? We are superficial. Now when you run to the kitchen soon to fix me my snack grab me a beer too while you're at it.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was my pick too, Jules.   You and I have been agreeing way too much lately   :lol:

 

Female Colts fans are the smartest group on the web. No joke either.

 

 

And now I present.......Decker with short hair and little clothing.

 

 

eric-decker-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Female Colts fans are the smartest group on the web. No joke either.

 

 

And now I present.......Decker with short hair and little clothing.

 

 

eric-decker-1.jpg

should have been barefoot,   the white socks  ain't doin' a thing for me     haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shout out for Adam. Loved him when he was here in NE but kickers aren't sexy.

Yeah I was just thinking that in addition to being good looking, he's not injured and he's been employed for a long time

 

All Good if you ask me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like two TEs . . . . Joe Fauria and Tony G . . .  Joe is the nephew of Christian who used to play for the pats . . .

 

 

http://www.nfl.com/photos/0ap1000000127699/0ap2000000156876

 

don't know how to post pics . . . so found this link and posted this instead . . . not many photos of him in a modeling role . . .

 

It's really very easy to post pics and I would be happy to help by walking you through it.

 

Click on the below link:

 

http://www.sportspickle.com/2013/09/photo-gallery-embarrassing-tom-brady-photos/nggallery/image/golfing-brady

 

Put your cursor on the picture you see. 

 

Then, either make a right click and then click on copy or just use control c.

 

Return here to post the pic by either doing a right click and then clicking on paste or using control v.

 

If needed, feel free to post the pic in the above link as often as necessary until you get the hang of it.  ;)

 

And, if you are still having problems; please let me know and I will try to give you further assistance. .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is hilarious... and actually a nice break from all the Bickering   ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...