Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

I'd take this mock draft all day


Recommended Posts

Found this one today.  http://www.rantsports.com/nfl/2013/11/14/2014-nfl-draft-indianapolis-colts-early-seven-round-mock/

 

The 7th rounder could be a toss up or a gamble but I'd like those first 4 picks.  Wayne's eventual replacement, a starting guard to go along with Donald Thomas and Alex Mack (Really hope we sign him) next year.  We would also get a starting ILB in Bullough and a potential starter at DE and a replacement for Redding.  I'd take this draft in a heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullough can't cover gonna need an athletic ILB. Smallwood or A.J Johnson would be better options.

 

You won't find a top ILB in the 5th round.   You get what you get.

 

The question becomes....  do you want to use a premium pick on a non-premium position like ILB?

 

Personally,  I don't want to.

 

I'd be fine with Bullough in the 5th.

 

Seems like a very good mock draft....   it's not what I'd personally like....   but all in all, if the draft was over, and those were the players we got,  I'd be fine with it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

You won't find a top ILB in the 5th round.   You get what you get.

 

The question becomes....  do you want to use a premium pick on a non-premium position like ILB?

 

Personally,  I don't want to.

 

I'd be fine with Bullough in the 5th.

ILB is a premium position in our defensive scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

I agree. I'd have no problem taking a mlb with a high pick. I'd absolutely have spent a first on a guy like Luke kuechly.

Yeah, it's a shame we had to use our 1st round pick on that Luck guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

I like either Borland or Perryman, Smallwood I like somewhat but I have concerns about him adjusting and making plays in space

You question Smallwood's play in space, but you like Borland?  I can't figure out how that makes any sense...

That's like saying I like Jordan Matthews,  I like Sammy Watkins somewhat but I question his speed.  Borland is the one you need to question in that department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just fooling around on first-pick.com, came up with this:

 

Round 3 Pick 8 (MINN): Jarvis Landry, WR, LSU (A)
Round 3 Pick 24: Yawin Smallwood, ILB, Connecticut (A)
Round 4 Pick 3 (JAX): Gabe Jackson, OG, Mississippi State (B+)
Round 4 Pick 8 (MINN): Keith McGill, CB, Utah (B)
Round 4 Pick 21 (JAX): Denzel Perryman, OLB, Miami (Fla.) (B+)
Round 5 Pick 24: Deandre Coleman, DT, California ©
Round 6 Pick 26 (N.E.): Cassius Marsh, DE, UCLA (E)
Round 7 Pick 21: LaDarius Perkins, RB, Mississippi State (C-)
Round 7 Pick 26 (N.E.): Demetrius Wright, FS, Southern California (D-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

Just fooling around on first-pick.com, came up with this:

 

Round 3 Pick 8 (MINN): Jarvis Landry, WR, LSU (A)

Round 3 Pick 24: Yawin Smallwood, ILB, Connecticut (A)

Round 4 Pick 3 (JAX): Gabe Jackson, OG, Mississippi State (B+)

Round 4 Pick 8 (MINN): Keith McGill, CB, Utah (B)

Round 4 Pick 21 (JAX): Denzel Perryman, OLB, Miami (Fla.) (B+)

Round 5 Pick 24: Deandre Coleman, DT, California ©

Round 6 Pick 26 (N.E.): Cassius Marsh, DE, UCLA (E)

Round 7 Pick 21: LaDarius Perkins, RB, Mississippi State (C-)

Round 7 Pick 26 (N.E.): Demetrius Wright, FS, Southern California (D-)

If we got both Landry and Smallwood, I would have a fit...and a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

I don't think either will be there in the third. 

Me either...I wouldn't be surprised if they were both gone by the 25th pick in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's a shame we had to use our 1st round pick on that Luck guy.

 

Obviously I didn't mean I would have taken Kuechly over Luck.  :neener:    I meant I would have gladly spent a 1st round pick on a MLB the caliber of Kuechly.  Though to be honest, if I'd had my way in that draft we would have traded back out of the first spot to #4 for Cleveland's entire draft and then traded back one more time and either take Kuechly or the best OL available and drafted Nick Foles a little later. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

Obviously I didn't mean I would have taken Kuechly over Luck.  :neener:    I meant I would have gladly spent a 1st round pick on a MLB the caliber of Kuechly.  Though to be honest, if I'd had my way in that draft we would have traded back out of the first spot to #4 for Cleveland's entire draft and then traded back one more time and either take Kuechly or the best OL available and drafted Nick Foles a little later. ;)

You would not draft Luck...I'd run and hide if I were you...this forum is about to explode with hate mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would not draft Luck...I'd run and hide if I were you...this forum is about to explode with hate mail.

 

No I would not have...and many here already know that.  I had quite a few debates about it with several members in the months leading up to the draft.  I didn't see Luck as being as head and shoulders ahead of the other QB's as most did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

Would much rather see this..

Borland wouldn't be an every down ILB, and doesn't have the speed to cover.  I think a lot of people here are overrating Borland to a significant degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us wait to see how Rogers and Whalen do before looking for another WR

 

While I think there is a chance Whalen could solidify a spot as one of our receivers, I don't think his presence will factor in to us looking for Reggie's replacement  ... he's never going to be a #1 IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I think there is a chance Whalen could solidify a spot as one of our receivers, I don't think his presence will factor in to us looking for Reggie's replacement  ... he's never going to be a #1 IMO

May I ask why Griff can't be a #1 WR?

 

IMO, Griff can be a #1 WR.  Speed is not needed, but explosiveness out of cuts. Consistency catching the ball. Seperation, even when double teamed is what makes a good #1 WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I ask why Griff can't be a #1 WR?

 

IMO, Griff can be a #1 WR.  Speed is not needed, but explosiveness out of cuts. Consistency catching the ball. Seperation, even when double teamed is what makes a good #1 WR.

 

I guess I depends on how you want to determine what constitutes a "#1 WR"

 

To me a #1 WR is someone who is a game changer, someone who demands special attention or double coverage, usually (but not always) the player has at least one or more outstanding physical attributes (size, speed, etc).  When I think of #1 WR's I think Calvin, AJ Green, Julio Jones, Fitz,  Andre Johnson, etc ...

 

Whalen falls more into the "reliable security blanket", shifty slot receiver type IMO ... good reliable hands, smart;  but often nothing physically exceptional about them, important cogs that help keep the chains moving, but probably not a guy who is going to get hot and carry you to a victory.  Even the guys like Welker, Amendola, Cobb, etc ... who are at the top in this role (and we can only hope Whalen reaches their level), I would not classify as #1 WRs.

 

I guess everyone may have a different idea of what being a #1 WR entails, but IMO Whalen's skill set, physical traits, & how he plays is not what I think of when I think "#1 WR".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I depends on how you want to determine what constitutes a "#1 WR"

 

To me a #1 WR is someone who is a game changer, someone who demands special attention or double coverage, usually (but not always) the player has at least one or more outstanding physical attributes (size, speed, etc).  When I think of #1 WR's I think Calvin, AJ Green, Julio Jones, Fitz,  Andre Johnson, etc ...

 

Whalen falls more into the "reliable security blanket", shifty slot receiver type IMO ... good reliable hands, smart;  but often nothing physically exceptional about them, important cogs that help keep the chains moving, but probably not a guy who is going to get hot and carry you to a victory.  Even the guys like Welker, Amendola, Cobb, etc ... who are at the top in this role (and we can only hope Whalen reaches their level), I would not classify as #1 WRs.

 

I guess everyone may have a different idea of what being a #1 WR entails, but IMO Whalen's skill set, physical traits, & how he plays is not what I think of when I think "#1 WR".

Ask your self this, is Reggie a #1 WR?  If you say yes, then Griff has the ability to be one as well.

 

Speed is not essential for a #1 WR.  Good hands, explosiveness out of breaks (cuts) and beating double coverage.

 

If Rogers continues to play well, he could be Reggie's replacement.  If not Grii will do.

 

We have speed in Hilton and Brazill, so our #1 does not need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask your self this, is Reggie a #1 WR?  If you say yes, then Griff has the ability to be one as well.

 

Speed is not essential for a #1 WR.  Good hands, explosiveness out of breaks (cuts) and beating double coverage.

 

If Rogers continues to play well, he could be Reggie's replacement.  If not Grii will do.

 

We have speed in Hilton and Brazill, so our #1 does not need it.

 

Wow, you are really high on Griff Whalen. I think he has the chance to be a decent player for us, but I am thinking his ceiling is more along the lines of Collie w/o the concussions.

 

I am not sure what I would classify Reggie as, definitely not your prototypical "#1 WR" anymore, since he has gotten older, and his role & his play has been somewhat adjusted it's hard to put a label on exactly what he is now.  His skill, experience, and connection to Luck have him putting up big numbers and definitely made him an integral part of the Colts' offense. I would almost classify him more like wes welker on patriots ... even though their playing styles are not the same, their roles,importance, and connection to their QB are very similar.  I also would not classify Patriots Wes Welker as a "#1 WR".

 

With that being said comparing Griff Whalen to Reggie Wayne is blasphemy.  I would say the chances are slim to none that Whalen is ever even half as good as Reggie.

 

I am sure there is some astronomical chance Griff Whalen becomes a #1 WR, but I wouldn't hold my breath or bet any money on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, you are really high on Griff Whalen. I think he has the chance to be a decent player for us, but I am thinking his ceiling is more along the lines of Collie w/o the concussions.

 

I am not sure what I would classify Reggie as, definitely not your prototypical "#1 WR" anymore, since he has gotten older, and his role & his play has been somewhat adjusted it's hard to put a label on exactly what he is now.  His skill, experience, and connection to Luck have him putting up big numbers and definitely made him an integral part of the Colts' offense. I would almost classify him more like wes welker on patriots ... even though their playing styles are not the same, their roles,importance, and connection to their QB are very similar.  I also would not classify Patriots Wes Welker as a "#1 WR".

 

With that being said comparing Griff Whalen to Reggie Wayne is blasphemy.  I would say the chances are slim to none that Whalen is ever even half as good as Reggie.

 

I am sure there is some astronomical chance Griff Whalen becomes a #1 WR, but I wouldn't hold my breath or bet any money on it.

I am and that is funny as I was against getting him.

 

I'm old school, and have been watching football for a long time.  Reggie, Griff, Welker and others like them are classic #1 WR, while Megatron, Andre Johnson AJ Green are the style of player that are replacing them.

 

Why is it blasphemy for comparing them.  They are both Colts and are similar in their play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then begs the question. Do u want to say draft a MJH at 4 and turn around in 4 years or would u say draft Turner and pay him 30mill in 4 years? All day every day for the franchise rush end. I am not a big believer in 30 mill for a wr. Reid is a fantastic coach and look what he did with Hill.
    • I literally just posted that clip, it's where the conversation about QBs started.
    • Funny you brought this up.  I just listened to an interview Ballard did today with Rich Eisen.  He asked him if he has given any thought on how many quarterbacks will be taken before our pick and how many does he think.  He said sure we go through those evaluations.  It helps us with for planning purposes.  He asked him how many.  4 or 5 or 6?   He laughed out loud at 6.  He said Rich if it’s 6 we will be so excited.  Let’s hope so.  He also said the draft board is not yet set.  Won’t be until the night before the draft.  He also said he has had multiple conversations with other GM’s concerning the draft.  Preparing themselves for opportunities that could take place.  And they will continue up until the draft starts.  He said trade conversations won’t really materialize until you are within three picks of any trade.  Giving you time to finalize it.  Interesting interview.  Oh he pretty much ruled out moving up for Harrison.   Going up into the top of the draft would be very costly for him he said.  Thinks he’s a great talent but he thinks he’s pretty much out of our reach.
    • I personally wouldn’t touch Williams with a 10 foot pole. He seems like a distraction and cancerous. He may be Uber talented but I don’t feel like he is a winner, and don’t feel like his heart is in it. I think he gets the bag and just sets it on cruise control. There is absolutely nothing to base this off of aside from my gut feeling.  Maye Daniels  Penix Nix McCarthy   Maye is your prototype passer and I think his deficiencies are easily fixed with good coaching.   Daniels seems the most limited to me, proficient and will be very dependent on where he goes.    Will always have a soft spot for Penix, he throws such a pretty deep ball. His 40 time should have opened some eyes.   Nix is probably the safest pick IMO. I think he’s got the tools to fit nearly any offense. Has the athleticism, arm talent and I think he’s got the between the ears to excel in most offenses.   I see the appeal with McCarthy, he was as unselfish as they come allowing the run game to shine instead of checking to pass plays. I think his ceiling is a solid game manager.  
    • I'd imagine he's going bald. Most men his age usually are when they start sporting the caps 24/7.
  • Members

    • w87r

      w87r 13,760

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,426

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,284

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,895

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,542

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ad24rouse

      ad24rouse 77

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,381

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,973

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 152

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...