-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By richard pallo · Posted
I like the move. What will be interesting to see is if a full year of NFL off season conditioning and workouts actually help Blankenship get stronger and improve his distance. -
Blankenship was consistent, the distance when it got to 49 and higher is what made us very very nervous. If nothing else, it upped the level of competition. I am all for this move. -
Slot chain mover guy, that is what he was at Penn State, but the slot with speed is what K J Hamler brings to their squad, so he became expendable, ironically K J Hamler is also from Penn State. We use our WRs so interchangeably that I am not sure we really need him, to be honest. If I get him on waivers, yes, without losing a draft pick. If not, I wouldn't worry about it.
-
A lot of people seem to disagree with you, but depending upon how it plays out, you might be right. If Wentz is playing well, the team is winning and he misses 3-4 games, you would probably rather have a vet. If Wentz falls on his face, however, you might as well see what you have in Eason before drafting a QB. -
I don't know that he will command Top 10 money by then. And Ryan Kelly's compensation actually goes down each year going forward, it was a very front loaded contract by Ballard standards, if I read it correctly. So the overall compensation given to the line will be top dollar when Nelson and Smith are extended, but I don't think that it will be outrageous. But we will almost have to fund the RG position with a young player under a rookie contract, IMO. Might find a replacement for Kelly at some point if he's dinged a lot or becomes too expensive. If our pricey Olineman are both OTs and the LG, I think we'll be fine. Might be able to afford a luxury at C if we're not paying WRs top dollar. I think that's how the cap structure might work under a Reich O.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts