Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

I didn't expect anything from rogers this game, but the way he looks compared to the DB's and that PI call satisfied me enough. Hopefully, next week we bench DHB and have rogers be our #2. Sounds far fetched but the coaches have listened to almost everything the fans have had to say so far. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brazill is doing good. Rogers should play but should not be replace with Brazill

I like what I have seen from Brazil I say DHB needs to be demoted to fourth string and Rogers or Brazil can have the other starting spot.

 

I still don't understand why we don't run slants or screens to get the ball out of Luck's hands fast.  Our o-line is having issues stopping a four man pass rush right now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like what I have seen from Brazil I say DHB needs to be demoted to fourth string and Rogers or Brazil can have the other starting spot.

 

I still don't understand why we don't run slants or screens to get the ball out of Luck's hands fast.  Our o-line is having issues stopping a four man pass rush right now. 

 

From what I've seen, the D gets too much push, and clog the short throwing lanes. When Luck tries, the D lineman raise their arms and deflect the pass quite often.  Luck needs throwing lanes, or he's going to have to learn to loft it over the line and LB's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, the D gets too much push, and clog the short throwing lanes. When Luck tries, the D lineman raise their arms and deflect the pass quite often.  Luck needs throwing lanes, or he's going to have to learn to loft it over the line and LB's.

Like I said earlier this thread it's not o-line time which is the bigger issue. 

 

With that said, the Colts need to do more to help Luck get the ball out quicker because it's clear the line can't hold up to give him the time or the lanes to go down the field.  The other team getting heat on the QB when the other team is blitzing when they are doing it with a simple four man front is embarrassing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our o-line is having issues stopping a four man pass rush right now.

That is just too depressing, but true......................................................................................................................................................................................................:......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is just too depressing, but true......................................................................................................................................................................................................:......................

The more depressing part they benched the public whipping boy like all the would be coaches on here called for and the line got worse meaning McGlynn might really be the best of what we have at the moment...

Link to post
Share on other sites

DaRick was targeted on one play and he drew a PA call when he beat the defender a ways downfield. Think he and Brazil need to be the main guys on the field with TY at this point.

Rogers is more of a complete reciever in terms of his raw talent and physical tools.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DaRick was targeted on one play and he drew a PA call when he beat the defender a ways downfield. Think he and Brazil need to be the main guys on the field with TY at this point.

Rogers is more of a complete reciever in terms of his raw talent and physical tools.

 

Agreed, those are who should be our top 3 WRs. Also DHB should be benched and Whalen should be brought back up to be our WR4 because although he is nothing special he has caught more balls than DHB and for sure has made more important plays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes. We still have a choice but based on the order of GMs listed.
    • Maybe they target someone in draft 
    • To Ballard's credit his first draft was a very weird position.  Ballard had Pagano as coach and the two of them had some very serious fundamental discrepancies about what constituted a winning football team - for example, Ballard clearly wants a 4-3 D and Pagano was a 3-4 guy.  Pagano was raving about Hooker as the next Ed Reed (I still wonder if Ballard would have made that pick had he has Reich and Flus in the building instead of Chuck).  To Hooker's credit, he was in the running for DROY and Pro Bowl until he got hurt his rookie year and he did look a bit better in the 3-4 than he has in the 4-3 (IMO anyway), though for the most part he's been solid for us (when healthy).   Mack was turning into a stud for us before he got hurt last year.  Grover Stewart has really improved and earned his big contract extension that he got mid-season last year.  Anthony Walker also produced multiple 100+ tackle seasons for us and was very productive for a late round guy.  While Banner didn't work out for us (sounds like a bad work ethic), he's been a starter in the league... Basham and Hairston have been OK for the NYJ and Q. Wilson was playing with the NYG late last season.   I may be wrong as of right now (current free agency) but I believe everyone of Ballard's draft picks from 2017 (his first draft) on are still in the league in some capacity.  My guess would be that he's the only GM in the league who could say the same (or one of the very few).
    • Raiders have NO pass rush, they're desperate. So if they cut a 24 years old pass rusher, no thank you..
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...