Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Robert Mathis


Rich Cannon

Recommended Posts

Only a year and a half into a new OLB position he has transitioned well, leading the league in sacks. I was always torn in the debate of Freeney vs. Mathis and who was a better player. I opted for Freeney years back but seeing how well Mathis has trasitioned due to his athletisism and versatility, its a clear cut answer at this point. Our organization made the right choice letting Freeney go. Who else on our defensive line will step up and fill the Freeney role? I really cant name anyone else on our defense that gets a consistent push off the line. Im looking at Franklin, Redding and Werner to step it up late in the season.(Werner has been struggling with injuries but appears to be healthy now)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert had good success against those 2nd string tackles and really loaded up with 3 sacks against the guy that quit on his team then got traded. And it has been a joy to see a few coverage sacks from our Colts D!

 And It`s always a pleasant surprise when he doesn`t get run all over. I`d take him over 3 Freeney`s for half the price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He disapears and is shut down too much for my liking tbh. Maybe those sackless games ave been a fluke

Who does? The league leader in sacks (by 1.5)? What do you want from the guy?

He's also done this largely without a rush from the other side. Justin Houston has Tamba Hali, Robert Quinn has Chris Long, etc. Who does Mathis have? A sometimes solid run stopper with limited pass rush and a rookie learning the ropes.

Tough crowd, tough crowd!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who does? The league leader in sacks (by 1.5)? What do you want from the guy?

He's also done this largely without a rush from the other side. Justin Houston has Tamba Hali, Robert Quinn has Chris Long, etc. Who does Mathis have? A sometimes solid run stopper with limited pass rush and a rookie learning the ropes.

Tough crowd, tough crowd!

It gets real irratating when we have no rush, especially when he is only single teamed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It gets real irratating when we have no rush, especially when he is only single teamed.

He has the most sacks in the NFL and is 5th in QB hurries (according to PFF), and again he has little help on the other side. What more can you ask of the guy?

Oh, and he's played the run pretty well too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has the most sacks in the NFL and is 5th in QB hurries (according to PFF), and again he has little help on the other side. What more can you ask of the guy?

Oh, and he's played the run pretty well too.

 

Couldn't agree more, he's really stepped up this season into his new role without much other help rushing the passer. Even in his sackless games he hasn't "disappeared", anyone watching the game can still see he's getting pressures on the QB at the least. Add in veteran leadership in the locker room and on the field, what's not to like.

 

Oh wait it's the new fad on these forums to dislike players for no apparent reason  :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

Mathis and Werner should have multiple sacks this week, Bradley Sowell is their starting LT.

Ain't no party like a Mathis sack party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mathis should get constant pressure this game, really anyone lined up defensive right should get pressure. Bradley Sowell is the worst starting OT in football.

Well he's been better then Levi Brown who was the biggest disaster I have ever seen. Our whole line is really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only a year and a half into a new OLB position he has transitioned well, leading the league in sacks. I was always torn in the debate of Freeney vs. Mathis and who was a better player. I opted for Freeney years back but seeing how well Mathis has trasitioned due to his athletisism and versatility, its a clear cut answer at this point. Our organization made the right choice letting Freeney go. Who else on our defensive line will step up and fill the Freeney role? I really cant name anyone else on our defense that gets a consistent push off the line. Im looking at Franklin, Redding and Werner to step it up late in the season.(Werner has been struggling with injuries but appears to be healthy now)

freeney was better than mathis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was. But one argument that Mathis is better is due to him transitioning so smoothly to OLB, with Freeney being atrocious.

Just because he's better at a different position doesn't mean he's better overall.

And Freeney was playing very well at OLB in San diego before his injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because he's better at a different position doesn't mean he's better overall.

And Freeney was playing very well at OLB in San diego before his injury.

I didn't follow what he was doing in San Diego, so I could be wrong. Maybe it's just Mathis having his best season(sack total at least) that has me leaning towards him right now haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because he's better at a different position doesn't mean he's better overall.

And Freeney was playing very well at OLB in San diego before his injury.

He was still a liability against the run from what I saw, He had 2 tackles in 4 games and a half sack, He had plenty of pressures which are vital in the pass rush, I'd say Freeney and Mathis are pretty even, Both are great pass rushers but liabilities against the run
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was still a liability against the run from what I saw, He had 2 tackles in 4 games and a half sack, He had plenty of pressures which are vital in the pass rush, I'd say Freeney and Mathis are pretty even, Both are great pass rushers but liabilities against the run

as a pass rusher, freeney is better
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before his injury, I believe Pro Football Focus had Freeney ranked as their #1 OLB.  Take that stat how you want; some people believe PFF's rankings are good, some think they are garbage

It just depends.  If PFF's rankings support ny preconceived ideas then they are good, if they don't support my preconceived ideas then they are garbarge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
    • Gus is aware of this too.  I don’t think Fields can keep this up.  I really like our team this week 
    • The advantages of an offensive minded head coach with a young QB are many. For example, if the HC is installing the offensive system. So if your young QB is a success, when your OC inevitably gets hired away by another team, the offensive structure will remain.    There's also the fact that defensive minded HCs seem to have trouble relating to young QBs. They're inherently risk averse, and overly reliant on their defense, so the overall approach to the game is conservative, which means every mistake by the QB gets highlighted by the coach's negative response. And I don't mean yelling and screaming on the sideline, I mean the QB turns the ball over in the first half, so the rest of the game the offense is super run heavy.    This is not true of all defensive minded guys, and there are some offensive minded HCs who struggle the same way. But I would lean toward an offensive coach if I had a young or developing QB, almost exclusively. I definitely don't think Eberflus is the right guy, but at least he's shown some growth in the last year or two. I was surprised by how much Hard Knocks showed him meeting solo with Caleb Williams.
    • seems slow to me...I don't think those cement inserts are working
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...