Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Call up Da'Rick Rogers


BlueCollarColts

Recommended Posts

Why does everyone think that Rogers can help this team right away?

 

There's a reason he's on the practice squad, and that reason is: HE'S NOT READY! 

 

He will not help this team if they call him up. 

People think you can just step in, run a route, and catch the ball. The kid has obviously struggled to pick up the system. I assume in the Colts offense, the WRs probably have to know every WR position. They also need to be able to read defenses and run the correct route. He spends his days running other teams plays......has to make it a little more difficult to learn our offense. 

 

That being said, I would like him to be moved up simply to start taking reps with the 53 in practice. Whalen is making some nice plays, but obviously has a lot to learn as well. An experienced receiver would have picked up the first down on his first catch. Instead, he spun the wrong way and was stopped 2 yards short. Last week, he ran a pick play that was absolutely worthless. He does have good hands and seems to find the gaps in the defense. 

 

If they don't get Rodgers called up soon, it isn't going to happen this season. He has no timing with Luck. One more receiver gets injured and he might get his day. I have seen enough of Reed bringing the ball out of the endzone though.....ready to move on from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

andrew can just tell him the play,DHB doesn't really runs complex routes, - " hey man, just run 10 yards, turn around and the ball will hit you in the numbers",

 

the thing is.. maybe Da'Rick will use his hands, DHB just lets it hit literally his numbers..

Are you serious? QB explaining the plays called to a wr...... rotflmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How in the world is there people saying we shouldn't take a shot at Da'Rick? Just watching him play in college has me convinced he is 10x more capable of catching balls than DHB. Da'Rick had some of the best hands in college football, he's big and physical, will fight for the ball in the air and extra yardage. I love the guy, but this is the exact reason I wish Griggs wouldn't have pulled the trigger on TRich. We could've sent our 2nd for Gordon and still have our 1st pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see him,he cant do any worse than a few wr's that are playing terrible now. I also think the team thought the other wr's would be doing far better than the pathetic play that has been,except ty.

Yeah, giant disappointment to find out you only had 2 WRs who could play the game, and one of them is on IR.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad we took a chance on Rogers, I was in favor of drafting him late.  But, bringing him up now will not help us; if anything it may hurt Rogers development to try to bring him in before he is ready/comfortable.  I don't think in his case he is just learning the playbook, he also learning what it takes to be, prepare, and perform like a pro (which is why I believe he was cut by Buf), and I don't think being "thrown in the fire" will help that process.

 

I would much rather wait until we have a healthy Reggie and TY on the field next year to bring him in so he has a better chance at having some early success without all the pressure to perform at a high level immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on this topic:

1. It's popular to say Rodgers doesn't know the play book, based on a tweet he sent stating that the play book was "for real." David Reed played receiver today. He's been here about as long as Rodgers. We're not talking about rocket science. I'm sure Rodgers knows enough to play, if Reed has learned in the same amount of time.

2. Griff Whalen new the play book and went from the PS to the 53, back to the PS and now back onto the 53. Knowing the play book isn't the only reason coaches make their decisions, it seems.

3. DHB has been outplayed by Griff Whalen. In the last two games that Griff has played, he's been the second best receiver outside of T.Y. Hilton. He had 3 catches for 30 yards vs. texans and 3 for 36 today. DHB had 1-11 and 3-30 in those same games.

4. So anyone saying that a guy from the practice squad cannot come In here and perform better than those who we already have would be proven wrong by Griff as an example, because he's played better than DHB and Brazill, all who were ahead of him on the depth chart.

5. Let's not forget that T-rich also came in and played right away with about 4 days of practice. I know it's a different position entirely, but it does allude to the play book not being such an obstacle for Rodgers to get a chance to play.

6. If the coaches have missed on Whalen and have opted to start DHB and Brazill ahead of him, then it's possible that they are overlooking Rodgers too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really are serious about Rodgers playing then you put him out there on a set number of plays that are designed for him and see if he can produce, from there you increase those plays the more he gets comfortable in the playbook and offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on this topic:

1. It's popular to say Rodgers doesn't know the play book, based on a tweet he sent stating that the play book was "for real." David Reed played receiver today. He's been here about as long as Rodgers. We're not talking about rocket science. I'm sure Rodgers knows enough to play, if Reed has learned in the same amount of time.

2. Griff Whalen new the play book and went from the PS to the 53, back to the PS and now back onto the 53. Knowing the play book isn't the only reason coaches make their decisions, it seems.

3. DHB has been outplayed by Griff Whalen. In the last two games that Griff has played, he's been the second best receiver outside of T.Y. Hilton. He had 3 catches for 30 yards vs. texans and 3 for 36 today. DHB had 1-11 and 3-30 in those same games.

4. So anyone saying that a guy from the practice squad cannot come In here and perform better than those who we already have would be proven wrong by Griff as an example, because he's played better than DHB and Brazill, all who were ahead of him on the depth chart.

5. Let's not forget that T-rich also came in and played right away with about 4 days of practice. I know it's a different position entirely, but it does allude to the play book not being such an obstacle for Rodgers to get a chance to play.

6. If the coaches have missed on Whalen and have opted to start DHB and Brazill ahead of him, then it's possible that they are overlooking Rodgers too.

 

1 & 2) Rogers is probably working on other things besides just the playbook on the practice squad. Of course there are other reasons besides knowing the playbook to be on the PS.

 

3) Griff is not asked to do the same thing as DHB, and does not bring some of DHB's other skills to the table.

 

4) See #3

 

5) - The learning curve of WR compared to RB are so different there is almost not a comparison.  Some WRs don't even start getting in a groove until the time it takes many RBs careers to be half over.

    - TRich is not a rookie with maturity issues.

    - We brought Trich in with expectation to play and contribute immediately and have no choice but to keep TRich on active roster regardless of how he performs or how much of the playbook he has learned.

 

6) Yes, its possible, but again see #3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 times out of 10, the unknown is more intriguing then the known.

On many teams by far the most popular player with fans is the backup QB (normally until he gets to play in a couple of games).  The coaches see all the training sessions, have more tape than the fans and know what they were trying to achieve on each play - if they think there is improvement by promoting somebody to the first string or benching somebody they know a lot more than the average fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the post   The issue we have now is TY Hilton is the only real threat.  DHB can't seem to catch a ball.   Teams will double TY and what do we have then?  The question you have to ask is would Rogers be any worse then DHB?  I don't know if a wooden indian could be worse.

Actually since dhb can't catch teams might let him run wide open and triple team hilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Game on the line, inconsistent passer at QB, and the OL is the strength of the team. Everyone in the world knew that the first priority was to stop JT. And they couldn't.    I don't know what's with this myth that there's something deficient about JT as a RB. It's nonsense.
    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
    • Gus is aware of this too.  I don’t think Fields can keep this up.  I really like our team this week 
    • The advantages of an offensive minded head coach with a young QB are many. For example, if the HC is installing the offensive system. So if your young QB is a success, when your OC inevitably gets hired away by another team, the offensive structure will remain.    There's also the fact that defensive minded HCs seem to have trouble relating to young QBs. They're inherently risk averse, and overly reliant on their defense, so the overall approach to the game is conservative, which means every mistake by the QB gets highlighted by the coach's negative response. And I don't mean yelling and screaming on the sideline, I mean the QB turns the ball over in the first half, so the rest of the game the offense is super run heavy.    This is not true of all defensive minded guys, and there are some offensive minded HCs who struggle the same way. But I would lean toward an offensive coach if I had a young or developing QB, almost exclusively. I definitely don't think Eberflus is the right guy, but at least he's shown some growth in the last year or two. I was surprised by how much Hard Knocks showed him meeting solo with Caleb Williams.
    • seems slow to me...I don't think those cement inserts are working
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...