Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Chuck Says No Trade


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Heyward-Bey and Hilton need to learn how to catch the ball on a regular basis!! Also, our LB corps are BAD!! Especially Angerer!! He blocks himself better then any O-lineman or Rb ever could. THe only tackles he makes is falling on the pile!! Trade for Paul Posluszny or Shawn Lee.... Navro Bowman too! 

Paul Posluszny!!

 

Paul Posluszny

 

Paul Posluszny
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading for Davis would be a horrible idea.

Care to elaborate? Fred Davis in 2011 and 2012 was one of the best TEs in football before his injury. We're talking 1 year ago, not 4 or 5, he was playing at an extremely high level. I find it hard to believe he's lost it all and we're talking a late round pick, none of that "mortgaging the future" crap people love to throw around.

I just don't see the value in Fred Davis. Once DA comes back he's disposable...

You do realize Dwayne Allen is out for the year, correct? You do realize the Colts could use a receiving threat this year, correct? Fred Davis would give us that receiving threat for as cheap as a 6th or 7th rounder. Do you really want to hold on to late round picks so badly that you'd give up a chance to improve this team now, when we are legitimate Super Bowl contenders?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Care to elaborate? Fred Davis in 2011 and 2012 was one of the best TEs in football before his injury. I find it hard to believe he's lost it all and we're talking a late round pick, none of that "mortgaging the future" crap people love to throw around.

You do realize Dwayne Allen is out for the year, correct? You do realize the Colts could use a receiving threat this year, correct? Fred Davis would give us that receiving threat for as cheap as a 6th or 7th rounder. Do you really want to hold on to late round picks so badly that you'd give up a chance to improve this team now, when we are legitimate Super Bowl contenders?

I predict a list of guys who were drafted in the 7th round and turned out to be really good coming your way. For the record I agree with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Care to elaborate? Fred Davis in 2011 and 2012 was one of the best TEs in football before his injury. We're talking 1 year ago, not 4 or 5, he was playing at an extremely high level. I find it hard to believe he's lost it all and we're talking a late round pick, none of that "mortgaging the future" crap people love to throw around.

You do realize Dwayne Allen is out for the year, correct? You do realize the Colts could use a receiving threat this year, correct? Fred Davis would give us that receiving threat for as cheap as a 6th or 7th rounder. Do you really want to hold on to late round picks so badly that you'd give up a chance to improve this team now, when we are legitimate Super Bowl contenders?

 

Scheffler is better and a FA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scheffler is better and a FA.

So basically you're saying "what have you done for me lately, Fred Davis?" If we get 70% of the Fred Davis from 2011/2012, he's better than Scheffler. Also, Fred Davis' is younger and his ceiling is much higher than Scheffler's (as we've seen).

So can we just chalk up your proclamation of the trade idea being "horrible" as hyperbole?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically you're saying "what have you done for me lately, Fred Davis?" If we get 70% of the Fred Davis from 2011/2012, he's better than Scheffler. Also, Fred Davis' is younger and his ceiling is much higher than Scheffler's (as we've seen).

So can we just chalk up your proclamation of the trade idea being "horrible" as hyperbole?

 

Nope, giving up even a late round pick for a one dimensional TE that has been benched for a rookie is a horrible idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well...     got a guy who didn’t know how to rush the QB, he recorded 17 sacks in two seasons at TCU.    8.5 in back to back seasons.    TCU plays a very unconventional defense, so BB’s skill set was very raw.   But he was not without real talent.     Do I wish we’d have drafted AJ Brown instead and taken BB at pick 59 instead of Campbell — sure.   But hopefully next off-season we will all feel better about our Day 2 picks from 2019. 
    • If you look at my post, I literally wrote the sentence “unless someone asks for WAY too much”...   So, if we were at an impasse, THEN Ballard would have the political cover to make a deal.    But, that would have to be the circumstance.  That the player is holding out and asking for way too much for something like this to happen.    But, you’ve moved the goal line.   Your previous arguments were to trade Q and Darius because they played the wrong positions to financially build around.   Your other argument was to trade them because they wanted market value and it was your view that top market value was too much.   NOW, your view is if they ask for an unreasonable over-the-market number.   Ok, if that scenario were to happen, I think Ballard would be willing to make a deal.   That said, the Colts have one of the top financial teams in the NFL.   We make very good, very competitive offers.   We convince players to take either no signing bonus, or a small signing bonus.   This past season Ballard was named by agents as the best and most fair GM to deal with.   He is admired and respected.   I do not see the scenario you’ve created happening.   Could it?  Sure, but highly, highly unlikely.  A long shot at best.
    • I voted other because @WarGhost21has proven it is possible to get quality edge at 54 and plenty of talent still available OT wise for his 3rd Rounder he acquired 
    • i wouldn't be too upset to see Eason under center in that scenario. We wouldn't win the SB with any other backup QB anyways.
    • With the 199th pick in the 6th Round the New England Patriots select Tom Br...  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...