Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Adam Schefter Thinks We Should Trade (Merge)


Recommended Posts

Mathis and Wayne for 4th round picks. I tend to agree with him a bit. Both are in final contract year and both will want to get a big payday. There is also a chance that if they don't get what they want, another team could sign them away and Colts get nothing. I say get as many picks as you can and shore up the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We will probably get more for them via compensatory picks than in a trade, so let them play their contracts out. If we get a 3rd rounder for Wayne, I am all for it. Mathis has less mileage and should get the nod for the payday over Wayne, IMO, if I HAD to choose.

Any new contract for Wayne should be heavily incentive based. Plus, let us not forget - Garcon might be playing for his next contract and Garcon along with Gonzo are in the last contract year as well. So, that is why it might be wise to wait it out till the end of this year to see how things unfold. Otherwise, it would be a case of buying a new house without making arrangements to sell your current one and end up with 2 mortgages (kinda like letting Lilja go without an adequate back up plan).

Edited by chad72
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they ought to try to find a team interested in both of them and package them for a 1st or high 2nd, if they can get it... I definitely wouldn't let them go for two 4th round picks though... I would probably go for two 3rd round picks though, cause we could trade those for a higher pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they ought to try to find a team interested in both of them and package them for a 1st or high 2nd, if they can get it... I definitely wouldn't let them go for two 4th round picks though... I would probably go for two 3rd round picks though, cause we could trade those for a higher pick.

Meanwhile, back on planet earth...

There is no way that Wayne & Mathis, either individually or collectively, would garner a 1st round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Hidden by Nadine, October 14, 2011 - Personal Shot
Hidden by Nadine, October 14, 2011 - Personal Shot

Pardon me...but who is Adam Schefter..?

Is everyone addicted to ESPN, Paco? :slaphead:

:facepalm:

I'm starting to find that is the only appropriate response to anything you post...

Edited by John Waylon
Link to comment

I think they ought to try to find a team interested in both of them and package them for a 1st or high 2nd, if they can get it... I definitely wouldn't let them go for two 4th round picks though... I would probably go for two 3rd round picks though, cause we could trade those for a higher pick.

Agreed, especially considering this deal would likely be to a team who considers themselves to have a chance this year and needs immediate help...I'd rather package them together for one higher round and one lower round pick than let them go individually for 4th's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys crazy? You want to trade 2 of our BEST players? The Wayne vs Harrison...not the same, Marvin went down on that block and was never the same, Reggie has been one of the most reliable receivers in the NFL for years. For Mathis...did you happen to catch R. Brocks words about Mathis on the "NFL Top 100 Players" that played on the NFLN...Mathis is a leader on that D and "sets the tone for the entire D". So you want to get rid of our most productive offensive weapon AND get rid of the guy with the most hustle on D?

Why dont you get rid of the players that DO NOT perform?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys crazy? You want to trade 2 of our BEST players? The Wayne vs Harrison...not the same, Marvin went down on that block and was never the same, Reggie has been one of the most reliable receivers in the NFL for years. For Mathis...did you happen to catch R. Brocks words about Mathis on the "NFL Top 100 Players" that played on the NFLN...Mathis is a leader on that D and "sets the tone for the entire D". So you want to get rid of our most productive offensive weapon AND get rid of the guy with the most hustle on D?

Why dont you get rid of the players that DO NOT perform?

Well, Thats pretty easy. Those guy's wouldn't get us anything in return. Wayne and Mathis are both free agents after the season and could easily decide to go elsewhere if they wanted too. Why not trade them and get picks to get younger guys in here when you have the opportunity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 14, 2011 - personal shot
Hidden by Nadine, October 14, 2011 - personal shot

agreed..... :facepalm: ....I thought everyone could at least use :google: lmao

It's kinda sad he'd even have to google it. It's not like he's some analyst that gets called in when keyshawn johnson is too busy being mediocre... He was the NFL's top reporter for a long time before going to ESPN to be their top NFL reporter.

In my mind that just goes to show what oldunclemark knows, and what he thinks he knows. To be an intelligent fan of the NFL and have no idea who Schefter is isn't very encouraging at all. A quick check of OLM's posts seem to support the theory as well.

Link to comment

You trade them to get some value for them. I live in Utah and that's exactly what the Utah Jazz did with their star guard Deron Williams...they got a first round pick and a first round picked player from that year of the draft. I think it was one of the smartest moves they could make...Williams wasn't indicating a willingness to re-sign with the team and if he did he would want a max deal...thus the Jazz traded him off and got some killer value for him.

I know from a fan's stand point it sucks to think about, but from a business stand point it's a brilliant move...but I doubt the Colts will do any of the above..they will just sit quietly and the deadline will probably pass without a single move from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you would not get anything for Lacey & Johnson, that was not the point. I dont understand the logic behind replacing production with potential. Why do you replace someone who is performing at a high level with a draft pick that MAY perform? I dont get it, Mathis and Wayne are not trending down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you would not get anything for Lacey & Johnson, that was not the point. I dont understand the logic behind replacing production with potential. Why do you replace someone who is performing at a high level with a draft pick that MAY perform? I dont get it, Mathis and Wayne are not trending down.

the one reason to do this is the fact that they're both FA's at the end of the year and they're both going to be signing what will most likely be their last pro contract. We have to evaluate and try to figure out how much money each one will want and in turn be worth, and whether or not we would be able to retain both of them. If there's a chance we can't I'd rather trade them now to a team who might be willing to pay a little more than they should out of desperation. If we do let them walk at the end of the year, then we would likely get a compensatory pick but what round it would be in will vary depending on several factors so could be anywhere from the 3rd round (I believe the 3rd is the highest round for a compensatory pick and it would be at the very end of the round) down to the 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to ask yourself, what difference would they make to the team THIS year. At this point, we are 0-5 with them playing, which is unfortunate. I like Mathis and Wayne, but there is no guarantee that they will be around next year. you can either take a gamble and hope that they stay with the team next year at a reasonable salary, or you can get something tangible in return. I would like for the front office to find a way to keep both of them, but that may not happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does someone at ESPN's opinion matter...when he seems to be suggesting something that's crazy

Their opinion doesn't necessarily matter to everyone, but Adam Schefter is one of the consensus gurus of all things NFL. He not only gets tons of inside information, he understands the business end of the NFL better than perhaps anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely hate this idea. They are corner stones of the Colts and he's saying trade them for 4th round picks over fear that they might not resign. If Polian does this I would be highly suspicious that he's tanking on purpose. since its nearly impossible to get players to tank, he'll have to get the best players off the field.

To be honest im mad even hearing a rumor like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will probably get more for them via compensatory picks than in a trade, so let them play their contracts out. If we get a 3rd rounder for Wayne, I am all for it. Mathis has less mileage and should get the nod for the payday over Wayne, IMO, if I HAD to choose.

Any new contract for Wayne should be heavily incentive based. Plus, let us not forget - Garcon might be playing for his next contract and Garcon along with Gonzo are in the last contract year as well. So, that is why it might be wise to wait it out till the end of this year to see how things unfold. Otherwise, it would be a case of buying a new house without making arrangements to sell your current one and end up with 2 mortgages (kinda like letting Lilja go without an adequate back up plan).

Chad is again CORRECT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely hate this idea. They are corner stones of the Colts and he's saying trade them for 4th round picks over fear that they might not resign. If Polian does this I would be highly suspicious that he's tanking on purpose. since its nearly impossible to get players to tank, he'll have to get the best players off the field.

To be honest im mad even hearing a rumor like this.

You don't need to get angry about it. There is no way Polian would do it anyway. I myself, would not mind the idea, although, I would like to get at least 2 - 3rd rder's for them. I do not like the idea of having to give them long term big money contracts after the season to get them to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we will franchise or sign Mathis..... With both Wayne and Garcon free agents, we will only be keeping one of them. No way we should trade either for picks especially for a fourth round pick.........

no way mathis is payed $13 million/year. that's what would happen if he is franchised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, back on planet earth...

There is no way that Wayne & Mathis, either individually or collectively, would garner a 1st round pick.

exactly!

some team is going to give up a 1st round pick for players that can walk away after this year and they get nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to ask yourself, what difference would they make to the team THIS year. At this point, we are 0-5 with them playing, which is unfortunate. I like Mathis and Wayne, but there is no guarantee that they will be around next year. you can either take a gamble and hope that they stay with the team next year at a reasonable salary, or you can get something tangible in return. I would like for the front office to find a way to keep both of them, but that may not happen.

You are correct. Since FA came into the NFL, teams must be nimble. Sometimes that means trading or releasing players who have been productive. The dreaded Patties are a case in point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly!

some team is going to give up a 1st round pick for players that can walk away after this year and they get nothing.

The colts would likely get a compensatory pick for each one I believe in the 2013 draft, and the round would be determined by their playing time and impact to the new team vs. the same for any FA's we bring in this coming offseason.

i am sure both players are unrestricted free agents, and the colts would get nothing if they sign with another team.

Prior to finalizing a trade, any potential trade partner would be allowed the opportunity to talk to both Wayne and Mathis so that they can workout a new contract. That's how teams safeguard themselves when trading for a player who will wind up an UFA the following offseason. This is also one thing that could keep them from being packaged to the same team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct. Since FA came into the NFL, teams must be nimble. Sometimes that means trading or releasing players who have been productive. The dreaded Patties are a case in point.

Right, Although I absolutely loathe the Pats, they have never been scared to trade aging players that will want a ton of money to resign. As fans, sometimes we get caught up with sentimental feelings for players and feel like the team should keep them out of sheer loyalty. People need to remember this is nothing more than just a business to the owners and sometimes they need to make wise business decisions. With all that said, I still say the Colts will not trade either of these guys because I think the Colts are one of the few teams that do show loyalty to a fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
  • Members

    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,290

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fingers

      Fingers 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,176

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 325

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...