Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Andrew Luck...


HarassedOffTheSite
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah probably not the best idea to post these kind of threads "no offense to the poster," before the games over because many times by the end of the game they will be invalid.  Well, from what we've seen from the Colts so far.  Definitely haven't looked good the first quarter at least lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Some very bad ones in the 1st Quarter especially. But he really did turn it up in the 2nd half. The whole team did.

Yeah I thought the whole team did. Wr's was dropping balls. Oline not making holes. D was getting gouged. Reed kept trying to return a kick, lol. Then we got it together and got the win. I wonder why we have started like that a lot. We did it against Miami, jax and Seattle. I thought the raiders also. Only team we came out strong was San fran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by shecolt, October 7, 2013 - response to removed post
Hidden by shecolt, October 7, 2013 - response to removed post

tickes off too many dummies when someone makes cogent observations?

 

haha, yeah I have no problem with game time post but yeah it seems to create problems on the board sometimes.  I usually refrain from posting game time threads, however I spend most of the time in the gamday forums during the time. 

Link to comment

Yeah I thought the whole team did. Wr's was dropping balls. Oline not making holes. D was getting gouged. Reed kept trying to return a kick, lol. Then we got it together and got the win. I wonder why we have started like that a lot. We did it against Miami, jax and Seattle. I thought the raiders also. Only team we came out strong was San fran

WHAT IN THE HEII DID REED CALL HIMSELF DOING?!

We've definitely developed a less than impressive 1 quarter and better 2nd half approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT IN THE heck DID REED CALL HIMSELF DOING?!

We've definitely developed a less than impressive 1 quarter and better 2nd half approach.

Where's Karim at these days? Reed hasn't looked good IMO. Why even waste a roster space. Just have anyone, I mean anyone just down the ball in the endzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the people attacking the OP, Luck wasn't that good early on and he made quite a few mistakes.

 

He finished the game very strong but that came AFTER this thread was posted. Stop crapping on him, he couldn't read the future.

 

I'm a guy who will say how I feel about certain threads, sometimes without a filter, but the people attacking the guy here really have no business doing it. He made some remarks about the less than stellar play from Luck early in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's Karim at these days? Reed hasn't looked good IMO. Why even waste a roster space. Just have anyone, I mean anyone just down the ball in the endzone.

I'm thinking that had to have been the coaches deciding that they wanted to try and create a big play on Special Teams. That was crazy. Me and my girlfriend were screaming at the T.V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the people attacking the OP, Luck wasn't that good early on and he made quite a few mistakes.

 

He finished the game very strong but that came AFTER this thread was posted. Stop crapping on him, he couldn't read the future.

 

I'm a guy who will say how I feel about certain threads, sometimes without a filter, but the people attacking the guy here really have no business doing it. He made some remarks about the less than stellar play from Luck early in the game.

 

I'm not attacking him, but posting a thread like this in the middle of a slow start about a QB (and team) that has a history of slow starts before they turn it around is practically asking to get hammered. I'm not going to beat the horse, but the horse knew there was a pretty good chance this would come back to bite him lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the people attacking the OP, Luck wasn't that good early on and he made quite a few mistakes.

He finished the game very strong but that came AFTER this thread was posted. Stop crapping on him, he couldn't read the future.

I'm a guy who will say how I feel about certain threads, sometimes without a filter, but the people attacking the guy here really have no business doing it. He made some remarks about the less than stellar play from Luck early in the game.

Does every bad patch really warrant it's own thread especially in the first quarter is what it seems a lot of people are jumping on.

Doesn't help that OP is calling people clowns and dummies. It's hardly a one way street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the people attacking the OP, Luck wasn't that good early on and he made quite a few mistakes.

He finished the game very strong but that came AFTER this thread was posted. Stop crapping on him, he couldn't read the future.

I'm a guy who will say how I feel about certain threads, sometimes without a filter, but the people attacking the guy here really have no business doing it. He made some remarks about the less than stellar play from Luck early in the game.

I love (when) my haters (chime in because it allows me to add them to my long and distinguished "ignore" list).

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love (when) my haters (chime in because it allows me to add them to my long and distinguished "ignore" list).

;)

 

Brian if you talking about me broski, wasn't hating on your thread at all... Just stating it's usually better to wait to the end of the game before posting, otherwise people will massively criticize your threads.  Makes sense...   That's why I usually stay in the gameday forums..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because starting a new thread...

 

Bro, that's not what I asked you. I asked how was Luck playing a horrible 1st quarter gonna bite me?

 

Guys like you worry about being "Razzed" or having something you type correctly "bite" you because some *mod edit* want to be themselves.

 

I'm nowhere near studying any of that B.S.

 

Sorry.

Edited by shecolt
inflammatory
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by shecolt, October 7, 2013 - response to removed post
Hidden by shecolt, October 7, 2013 - response to removed post

tickes off too many dummies when someone makes cogent observations?

Somewhat quoting out of context of the full reply there and that was one of the more balanced replies!

The point you make was valid 1st qtr but it's a long game and hindsight is a wonderful thing. Luck started cold same as against the Jags but made some excellent throws later in the game.

Link to comment

Bro, that's not what I asked you. I asked how was Luck playing a horrible 1st quarter gonna bite me?

 

Guys like you worry about being "Razzed" or having something you type correctly "bite" you because some *mod edit* want to be themselves.

 

I'm nowhere near studying any of that B.S.

 

Sorry.

 

That moment where I realize that signing up for a Colts forum with a Simpsons icon and screenname was serious business above and beyond what I thought. 

 

I have no idea what you're asking here. I thought I explained my case pretty clearly- apparently I was wrong. Also, I apologize for the use of analogies, which you seem to be taking dead literally. 

 

And for the love of Luck's neckbeard, please don't ask me to explain how something can be "dead" literal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That is why I made it.

Sigh again with the selective quoting and ignoring anything you don't agree with. You know you make some good points but your abrasive manner erodes your credibility sometimes.

So you don't think Luck improved as the game wore on, or the two throws to TY for his TDs were slot on, nor the bullet for the 2pt conversion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love (when) my haters (chime in because it allows me to add them to my long and distinguished "ignore" list).

;)

There's something I heard one time that I'm going to paraphrase. It says if one person you meet is a jerk, they're a jerk. If everyone you meet is a jerk, you might be the jerk.

Making a reactionary post in the first quarter of a long game isn't technically against the rules, but it's not an easy way to make friends. Calling people clowns and dummies is actually against the rules.

Feel free to count me among your "haters" if that's what you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh again with the selective quoting and ignoring anything you don't agree with. You know you make some good points but your abrasive manner erodes your credibility sometimes.

So you don't think Luck improved as the game wore on, or the two throws to TY for his TDs were slot on, nor the bullet for the 2pt conversion?

 

It's as if this isn't clicking for some of y'all. My statements and their validity/credibility stand on their own independant of my manner in relaying them or anyone's agreement. Try not to sigh so much.

 

What Luck did as the game wore on has nothing to do with my original post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not a lot to go off of. Looks like Addison was trying to catch Wentz at the end. 
    • Titans have 1 and done in the playoffs written all over them with all the key injuries they are having now. Who knows about Henry, he may not even come back and if he does he will be rusty. Jones has been injured as well and a complete fail for them too. The AFC is full of parity and it boils down to which teams will be the healthiest at the end of the season. Right now the Colts are pretty healthy luckily. Leonard and Nelson have small nagging injuries but they are still playing and producing. Even TY is healthy.
    • Seems like he got pushed and stumbles into him. Definitely warrants the penalty, but I don't think it should have a fine.
    • I think the only way we win this game is to be at least +7 points off turnovers.   I don’t have high hopes to win because the cardiac colts haven’t proven to be consistent in their game plan (thanks frank), and execution on the field.   I was 50/50 for the buffalo game because I figured buffalo has faltered a fair bit but I don’t see the bucs faltering as much especially against our inconsistency on defense.   I sure hope we win of course and I’ll be more ecstatic than anyone if they do!
    • First off,  their is no such thing as a Z play.   That's a position.   It used to be called a flanker.  An off ball receiver.    Any way Ballard drafted him to be a chain mover.  He has said as much.   No one drafts a running back expecting him to break off 40 yard runs.   That is a theory you came up with on your own,  and wrong.    Ballard wanted him because he is versatile and can get a 4th and 1.   He is capable of breaking off a long one and move the pile in short yardage.   Congrats on being wrong again
  • Members

    • IrsaysArmy

      IrsaysArmy 301

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar7

      ar7 403

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 918

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lurker

      Lurker 38

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 6,730

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fourstar40

      Fourstar40 18

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 326

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 243

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...