Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Would You Trade All Our Offensive Firepower For A Perennial Top 5 Defense?


WSO

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one who feels this way? I think manning could do without pro bowl caliber players on offense and work with players of the same caliber as garçon white and collie. I really hope we address defense this draft and through f/a.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade our offensive firepower for a top 5 defense? Peyton Manning IS at least 80% of that firepower.

However I wouldn't trade it for a top 5 defense, there's got to be a balance between offense and defense for a great team to flourish, we certainly do not have that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say yes and just keep peyton... the guy improves everyones game, the colts with a top 5 defense.. i dont think the nfl would be ready for something like that.... i too hope the colts address the defense this year.. they have enough options on offense its now time to address the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The D philosophy has just simply got to change. Or the staff....... The Colts cover 2 has had one great year of total D (09), and one spectacular short run (SB win)

Outside of that... this D has been tick poor. And I for one am just simply tired of relying on our O to bail us out game after game. Our D cannot stop anyone when they need to, they are too darn small. Oh and they can't tackle a fat kid.

the Colts should have won today.but .......................

aggggg.. I won't even start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The D philosophy has just simply got to change. Or the staff....... The Colts cover 2 has had one great year of total D (09), and one spectacular short run (SB win)

Outside of that... this D has been tick poor. And I for one am just simply tired of relying on our O to bail us out game after game. Our D cannot stop anyone when they need to, they are too darn small. Oh and they can't tackle a fat kid.

the Colts should have won today.but .......................

aggggg.. I won't even start.

Sometimes i know its not right but 3:00 minutes left in the game and the colts punt it.... idc what game it is i always expect worse, that just comes with the territory with the colts defense their bend but dont break system always fails them in situations like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Colts need to be more aggressive in Free Agency next year, and stray away from being lackadasical during that period.....

As for trading an offense..No way.....Stick with the guys that made us who we are...

When you play with Manning it's either shape up, or ship out.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be awesome to have a top 5 defense, but trading all the offensive firepower would be counter-productive. Manning might be able to make some guys look better than they are, but Blair White's success last year had a lot to do with being an unknown quantity on a team with Reggie Wayne. Other teams figured that without Dallas Clark in there, we'd have to go to Reggie, so they stepped up coverage on him, leaving White open. To trade away all the offensive firepower would negate that.

If trading away Clark and Reggie, but keeping Garcon, Collie, and Addai could get us a top 5 defense, then yes, do it now. But you can't be completely one-sided on either side of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in reality your asking the Colts to turn into the Bears. Then the answer is no.

Jay Cutler is not even near the level of Manning so I dont see the comparison. Also the Bears suck because they have absolutely no offensive line (ironically Forte just had a career game).

I'm saying would you guys be willing to give up players like Wayne, Clark, Addai and keep late round players like Collie, White, Garcon while having a top tier defense? Also for those saying that they love seeing offense, its nice until you get an early playoff exit and realize you need defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be awesome to have a top 5 defense, but trading all the offensive firepower would be counter-productive. Manning might be able to make some guys look better than they are, but Blair White's success last year had a lot to do with being an unknown quantity on a team with Reggie Wayne. Other teams figured that without Dallas Clark in there, we'd have to go to Reggie, so they stepped up coverage on him, leaving White open. To trade away all the offensive firepower would negate that.

If trading away Clark and Reggie, but keeping Garcon, Collie, and Addai could get us a top 5 defense, then yes, do it now. But you can't be completely one-sided on either side of the ball.

exactly what I;m getting at is the Colts need to start addressing the defense more. We can live with guys like Garcon, Collie, and other future late round picks. There are a lot of good players that can be found in the later rounds. You don't need to draft a Michael Crabtree, Reggie Bush etc. when you can find players like Collie, Garcon in the later rounds who give just as much production. Especially with a player like Manning who brings out greatness. When players go down on offense we have seen time and time again their backups do a great job of filling in. White did excellent last year, Collie was a steal in the 4th round, Rhodes did very well when Addai was injured, Jacob Tamme played excellent when Clark got hurt.

This is a problem we have on defense, we don't get good play out of backup players like we do on offense.

Edited by ssarow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking to the future, post Manning...the odds on getting another QB anywhere close to his caliber are not good. We need a strong defense to go with an average QB, so yes, I'd trade. We will be in that position when Manning retires, so we need to start building the defense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who feels this way? I think manning could do without pro bowl caliber players on offense and work with players of the same caliber as garçon white and collie. I really hope we address defense this draft and through f/a.

No..thr NFL is an offensive theatre now...

Green Bay is not great defensively....but you cant stop them..

New Orleans, Philadelphia and New England dare the same way...

..just like we'd been for 10 years..

You win with big timeoffense..the game has changed..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The D philosophy has just simply got to change. Or the staff....... The Colts cover 2 has had one great year of total D (09), and one spectacular short run (SB win) Outside of that... this D has been tick poor.

Really? Then how the heck could we end up #2 in 2005, #1(!) in 2007, and a number of other top 10 positions on the Points/game rankings? What could be a better measurement of a defense than Points/game? We had a really good D until 2009. Then we had some bad luck with injuries, and a couple of bad picks and we ended up here. But this D is still not tick poor. Just imagine the current D with Sanders in SS position for example...

The D is not principally bad. It has some obvious flaws, which our opponents can take advantage of. The longer the D has to be on the field, those flaws can be exploited easier, and this D spends a lot of time on field nowadays...

We need to draft a playmaker CB, a good safety, and a big d-line guy, and this D will look a heckuva lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need to get rid of that stupid bent but don't break defence,there doing alot of breaking,

The scheme has worked fine for 2 or even 3 quarters in a game. But when our offense only puts up 30 yards after halftime, any defense is going to break. It doesn't matter who the team is, or what scheme is being run.

If the offense stops offering assistance, the defense will break down.

This statement is so ignorant, like so many here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offensive fire-power is Peyton Mannng and Reggie Wayne. None of these other guys even matter. Yes, I am including Dallas.

If no one matters exept Peyton and Reggie, then what the heck happened to our O last year? Peyton and Reggie were playing all season along, only some of those who don't matter were injured...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If no one matters exept Peyton and Reggie, then what the heck happened to our O last year? Peyton and Reggie were playing all season along, only some of those who don't matter were injured...

Peyton was dealing with the neck injury all season and kept throwing interceptions due to arm numbness,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it that Green Bay can find that perfect balance between explosive offense with a good defense yet the Colts can not ever seem to get it right? The closest we came was probably 05 and 09 to a lesser extent.

Coaching. We have the talent , just bad schemes . which makes us look reeally bad at defense and doesnt work at all. except for cornerbacks , they deff suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming we still get Manning? Then yes, this isn't even debatable. In fact, I think many Colts fans have been begging for an "average" defense, let alone a top-five defense. Could you imagine Manning quarterbacking the Steelers, Ravens, Jets, or (gasp)...the Bears. It wouldn't be fair. We couldn't run the ball last year, lost Dallas Clark and yet the Colts led the league in passing with "stars" like Tamme and White and won their division. Why have we won one Super Bowl in 13 Manning Years? Some of the worst defense and special teams play the league can offer.

On a separate note, does anyone else think it's crazy when Sanchez and Roethlisberger get credit for "leading" their teams to AFC championship games and Super Bowls by the media? Would Manning need fourth-quarter comebacks to win games with the Steelers or would they win every game by 30 points?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think the defense is the same old. For starters, our defense is no longer undersized, and doesn't struggle against the run.   If the Colts draft a man coverage corner in the first round, it will signal a major departure from the previous way of doing things, and it probably means Gus Bradley is gone after this season. I'm not against any of that happening. I just don't expect it, based on the established pattern.   As for what Ballard said in his presser, he also acknowledged that the expected top three boundary corners were unavailable for most of the season. Brents was our highly drafted rookie, and only played 9 games; Flowers played four games; Rodgers was released. That left us with rookies and journeyman playing corner most of the season. With Brents in Year 2 and hopefully healthy, Flowers back and healthy, another year in for Jaylon Jones, that gives Bradley a lot more to work with in the secondary. And I think that's more what Ballard was implying with his comments. Otherwise, he probably would have signed a veteran corner already.
    • Are you going to tell me that I haven’t heaped tons of thanks on you?   How many times have I said thank you and that you are way too kind with your praise?  The answer is many.   I’m sorry you seem not to remember those moments.     Sorry about the headache.  The feeling was mutual.  
    • That has always been my issue going back to the Polian years. They preferred undersized players to fit this scheme. That was great when they had a lead and played indoors. The problem  is that teams started running the ball to keep Peyton on the bench. Plus, u get in bad weather and on grass, their speed is negated and they are just a bunch of undersized players getting blown off the ball. I am in favor of building a team that can play in any environment and that can run various schemes. I see flexibility with the offence, however the D is the same old. That's why I think this is an important draft defensively. Will the Colts stray from their previous tendancies of drafting players that fit the Seattle scheme or will they deviate and say draft a man corner? Last year we were all on the edge of our seats when a trade was made at 3. Will we get our qb at 4? We were all on pins and needles till they made that pick. This draft has that same excitement for me. At 15 will Ballard and company do something different? This team needs a play maker on D and I contend that is their biggest need. I don't believe they get that player moving back.  Sure u may get him at 15 but if u really want a playmaker, this just might be the year to say move up and get a guy like Mirchell and Latu who may fall because of the medical. I am not in favor of getting a wr or te. Richardson, if he is the guy, should deliver explosive plays with our current roster.  Jot a fan of Gus and this scheme, but I really don't think he has a lot to work with and Ballard kind of eluded to that in his post season pressers.
    • The move happened before the 1984 season. To put in perspective how great Luck was here, here are the top 3 QBs over 40 seasons here win wise: Regular Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 141 wins 2. Andrew Luck = 53 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 20 wins   Post Season as a starter 1. Peyton Manning = 9 wins (won the SB in 2006) 2. Andrew Luck = 4 wins 3. Jim Harbaugh = 2 wins   Luck had 33 more wins than Jim did and 2 more playoff wins than Jim did. Luck is so far ahead of any QB (not named Peyton) regarding wins in the Regular Season and Post Season that it is laughable.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...