Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NCost12

Breaking news: Colts trade for Trent Richardson (((merge)))

Recommended Posts

You've got to be kidding me....this guy was a top 3 overall draft choice LAST YEAR. If we can scrap together a wild card-type season, the value we just got is insane. 

 

Plus, if he is less than 100% right now, we can afford to be patient with him. Cleveland couldn't. 

 

In other news, Cleveland's now so desperate for RB help they're going to bring in the Moleman to start if Mcgahee doesn't check out.

He shouldn't have been a top 3 pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think of it this way also, he now has a stud QB to take the pressure of him pounding it. Works both ways. If he is as good a pass blocker as we say then its a win situation. With Allen gone Luck needs his Backs to be at the top of their blocking assignments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently our O-line is the 5th best run blocking O-line according to PFF. We now have Bradshaw and Richardson. This will mean that defenses cannot focus solely on stopping our passing game. They have to respect both the run and the pass. So in many way, this will help our O-line.

 

I like this move. Now it's up to our team to make sure it isn't too costly.

Wally West gets it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are people freaking out about trading a first round pick? We won't get anybody as good as Trent Richardson with that pick

First round picks are worshiped. But they're not all that hot after the 1-10 round really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

 

That's the sticking point for me too. I don't mind the concept of TR, I can imagine him being great in this offense... But if they were willing to give up a 1st, I wish it would've been on a legit pass rusher. It would've helped the DBs, freed up Mathis, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irsay alluded to Grigs rolling the dice. And I agree it is especially if we have a miserable season, but after the top 5? It's hit or miss for a lot of players in the first round anyways.

I think we've seen time and time again that first round pick doesn't equate to a first round quality of player.

This I can agree with we seem awfully free and easy with trading picks sometimes, when you look at the stockpilers like the 49ers and Pats they can afford to draft risky players as they have more dice rolls.

The proof is in the pudding I guess, I still worry about the O line big time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On around the league they think the Browns got rid Richardson because he is beat up and has a lot of mileage and that the Colts are desperate. GROUND and POUND here we come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Ravens fan, and presumably a Flacco fan, I would think you'd be wiser than focusing in on just one game to draw any conclusions about a guy.

Just pointing out stats. I actually like the trade for the Colts, and also the Ravens. That game in Cleveland just got a bit easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see. 

 

We currently have a running back coming of a foot injury that is signed for 1 year. 

 

We have another that is on the last year of his contract and probably won't be re-signed. 

 

We have another that just blew up his knee and we have no idea how he'll be when he returns. 

 

So we go out and grab a guy who was a top-5 pick and who could become our answer at RB for the next 6-7 years for a pick around what.....20th or so?  And some people are complaining? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

 

The game is radically different than it was 13 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Colts can make the playoffs, or get very close to it, that draft pick would be worth it for Trent.

 

If they have a bad year, it's more questionable.

 

However, now the Colts get a legit running back who has the potential to be a top 10 player in the NFL (although maybe not with the Colts). It's a great trade for fans, the team and everyone. The Browns almost guarantee a bad season now.

 

I think this is a very good trade. Trent Richardson was a top 3 pick last year and had top 10 talent. This has crazy potential written all over it.

 

I LOVE IT!!!!! I'm just very surprised right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm both excited and kinda of concerned about this trade. Hopefully Trent can make a HUGE difference in the running and blocking game for us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Return to feeling down about GTA V.

That games incredible.

 

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I thought this was an April Fool's Day joke when I first read it but then I remembered that it's September. haha

My brother in law is a Browns fan, as if that a worse enough fate, they just lost their star player. However it's not hard to be a star for the Browns lol.

I'm hoping he can live up to potential, but we will see. He's skilled enough, but that doesn't always translate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First round picks are worshiped. But they're not all that hot after the 1-10 round really.

It's because it's a running back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my god, I'm ok with it if we are picking in the mid twenties again. If we are picking in the mid teens, I don't know, have my doubts to me this is a wait and see! I guess I'll just have to trust in Gregie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

haha sorry buddy. But rest assured when you track down a copy, you will be far far from disappointed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consider it this way:

Richardson was the 3rd overall pick and certainly a top 5 player in that draft.  Our first round pick in 2014 is likely to be after 20.  So we went from 20 to get a top 5 player.  If he can stay healthy, this will be an incredible deal

AND he will most certainly replace Donald Brown who was a 1st round bust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Ravens fan, and presumably a Flacco fan, I would think you'd be wiser than focusing in on just one game to draw any conclusions about a guy.

 

Think again he focused on the Ravens game      

   First, then the fins  .so technically  its 2 games .. :rock:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see. 

 

We currently have a running back coming of a foot injury that is signed for 1 year. 

 

We have another that is on the last year of his contract and probably won't be re-signed. 

 

We have another that just blew up his knee and we have no idea how he'll be when he returns. 

 

So we go out and grab a guy who was a top-5 pick and who could become our answer at RB for the next 6-7 years for a pick around what.....20th or so?  And some people are complaining? 

 

Great post! You put it all in perspective!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently browns fans are furious and is demanding more then a 1st, maybe grigs did good again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha sorry buddy. But rest assured when you track down a copy, you will be far far from disappointed.

 

haha I know. I watch gameplay vids everyday on youtube. Can't wait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because it's a running back

If this season becomes a top 5 pick season, this move is a disaster. However, if we pick in the range we did this year, and Richardson pans out. That's a very solid trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first trade or acquisition the Colts have made in a long time where the Colts got a BEAST.

 

No, Caesar Rayford, or any of the free agent pickups were made are/were not beasts.

 

Trent's a beast. This is probably the 2nd biggest trade in Indy Colts history. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother in law is a Browns fan, as if that a worse enough fate, they just lost their star player. However it's not hard to be a star for the Browns lol.

I'm hoping he can live up to potential, but we will see. He's skilled enough, but that doesn't always translate.

Yeah, I was gonna say that the Browns traded their best player but then I remembered Joe Haden. They must want to run out of QBs before the season's over, because Hoyer is going to be killed without the threat of the run game and Weeden is already out. You're right, we'll have to wait and see if Richardson's talent transfers over to Hamilton's pass-first offense. Should be interesting to see if he plays Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are complaining, Colts got a steal here. Cleveland is nuts, they gave up 3 picks to move up to get him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

Wait did you not get GTA or something TK? If it makes you feel better I have it, but it's still in the shrink wrap because I haven't time to play it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ill win this argument easily

rarely do you see sure fire first round picks like luck

we just got a sure fire rb and know what he is capable of

 

nobody and I tell you nobody is a sure fire pick where the colts pick next year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, I agree, I agree.

 

But Richardson is a really good back, better than anyone we've had since 2000 Edgerrin James. There's upside now, but giving up a first is strange. We had better make the playoffs, otherwise that pick is going to be much more valuable than the player.

 

 

i think you nay sayers are wrong on this one. Richardson has been nicked up and playing for a team where opponents played mostly 8 in the box. He should be better than what we would have available in 2014 draft. I wonder how much of the 13 mill in signing bonus the Browns eat ? I looked at various cap sites and cannot find anything more than 13 mill prorated over 4 years. Could it be that they have to eat the whole bonus ? I don't see anything that says part was a roster bonus in later years.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

Just told my wife the exact same thing.  I prefaced it with 1st round bust Donald Brown.  GO COLTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My take   1. We overachieved last season. Period 2. We played at KC 3. TY limited the offense because he was so injured.  4. We played a very very good coach with time to prepare and his guys got some rest too and time to scout the team. Remember, Reich is well known to Reid as well by now.  5. Not having Hooker really mattered 6. Play calling was a bit blah 7. How does Vinny automatic miss those kicks? 8. A strip sack for us turns into a strip sack for them a few plays later, that hurt.  9. A young team who wasn’t supposed to be in the playoffs, let alone a second game in the playoffs had some factor here.  10. KC had a pretty good team   my concern from that game would be how poorly our run game was going forward. Kelly better play better than he did this season or I don’t see a 15 million/yr contract coming his way in Indy. I think with a healthy TY, the additions of DF and Cain and Paris and others should really boost that offense. An offense with TY, Paris, Doyle, EE and Mack, now that’s gonna be a tough group to match up with and defend. Run or pass, heck coach, idk what they are doing lol.    Gonna be fun to see this team evolve and have better back ups coming off the bench. I just hope we have enough beef in the middle to stop the run and I just hope that Kelly was hobbled in that KC game because it was one of his worst games that year. 
    • This again boils down to you hanging on to 'this is how it's always been done.' And you don't get that I don't care about that rationale. I think it can be done better. Which is why, in my first post in this thread, I said "to me, it's a no brainer." To me. It should be obvious that this is my stated preference, not me saying that teams that don't do it this way are stupid.   There should be nothing more that I have to say about that, except you continue to rely on that appeal to authority, and I'm telling you that 'how it's always been done' isn't legitimate reason for not examining potential alternatives. Not just in this area, but in everything.      You're missing an important detail, and I think it's because you've put my argument in a box and are unwilling to actually examine it on its merits.   As I said initially, and have said since, my argument is to make this change six months sooner, not six months later. "Imagine if we had fired Grigson in June 2016 instead of January 2017." Did you miss that part, again? What about "if the Texans had waited until January 2020 to fire Gaine..."?    I want him in asap. You want him asap, but not until January.   My statement about it being just one draft is referencing the worst case scenario, which is 'we just blew a draft cycle by letting a lame duck GM stay,' to which I say 'get over it, I'm okay with that if that's what it takes to get the guy I want in the building, with the staff he wants.' And that's where my argument about it potentially being easier to interview candidates in the down season after the draft is critical. The Jets wanted Joe Douglas; he evidently didn't want to entertain a move during draft season, but jumped at it in May/June. (There's the matter of moving his family during the school year, etc.) In theory, this approach could make it easier to interview good candidates. Whether you agree with that or not, whether it's important to you or not, this is mostly an aside. As I said, this was my response to the alarmist reaction of 'they just blew a draft!' Which I think is overstated, especially in the Texans' case.     Not at all. Again, if Ballard started in June 2016, he theoretically could have changed coaches a year sooner.      This is a hindsight fallacy. Go back to the Texans wanting to hire Caserio. I'm not arguing that he's going to be a great GM, I'm arguing that he's the guy they want to hire, and he's available in June. Same for the Jets and Douglas. The Chiefs and Veach.    We know that every person hired doesn't succeed. I never argued that they do. That's true of whoever you rush to hire in January. The point is that there is always a pool of qualified candidates from which to choose. I won't be retracting that, I firmly believe it, and I said it when the Colts were interviewing coaches in 2012, when they interviewed GMs in 2017, and when they interviewed coaches in 2018. You choosing to reject that is pretty ridiculous, to be honest. There are always qualified candidates. Choosing the right one is a different story.   And again, if there's one guy you really, desperately want, why wait until January to get him?     You could give me the benefit of the doubt and assume that if I'm saying it, I mean it. Especially this far into the discussion...    And going back to what I said earlier, this is and always has been my opinion. I'm not offering studies and conclusive evidence to support this opinion because it's a personal preference, it's what I think would be best (although I have offered evidence and rationale to support my opinion, you've just chosen to reject, for reasons I don't agree with).    I'm okay with the disagreement. What I find personally off-putting is the insistence that, because you don't understand my angle, it means I either haven't actually thought it through, or I don't actually believe it. As I said earlier, I understand that general consensus disagrees with my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to conform. The fact that I'm presenting an argument in earnest should be enough.
    • I'm an Iowa fan but I'd kind of like to see Michigan win that game so that it can maybe move back towards the appearance of a real rivalry.     That is unless an Ohio State victory would somehow help Iowa, in that situation I would root for the Buckeyes. 
    • 1. Turay - He looked pretty promising at times.   2a Nelson, 2b Leonard - They say that the biggest improvement comes in the 2nd year.  Amazing to think that 2 all pros could get better. 3. Rock Yan Sin  4. Hooker 5. Campbell
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...