Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NCost12

Breaking news: Colts trade for Trent Richardson (((merge)))

Recommended Posts

You've got to be kidding me....this guy was a top 3 overall draft choice LAST YEAR. If we can scrap together a wild card-type season, the value we just got is insane. 

 

Plus, if he is less than 100% right now, we can afford to be patient with him. Cleveland couldn't. 

 

In other news, Cleveland's now so desperate for RB help they're going to bring in the Moleman to start if Mcgahee doesn't check out.

He shouldn't have been a top 3 pick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think of it this way also, he now has a stud QB to take the pressure of him pounding it. Works both ways. If he is as good a pass blocker as we say then its a win situation. With Allen gone Luck needs his Backs to be at the top of their blocking assignments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently our O-line is the 5th best run blocking O-line according to PFF. We now have Bradshaw and Richardson. This will mean that defenses cannot focus solely on stopping our passing game. They have to respect both the run and the pass. So in many way, this will help our O-line.

 

I like this move. Now it's up to our team to make sure it isn't too costly.

Wally West gets it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are people freaking out about trading a first round pick? We won't get anybody as good as Trent Richardson with that pick

First round picks are worshiped. But they're not all that hot after the 1-10 round really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

 

That's the sticking point for me too. I don't mind the concept of TR, I can imagine him being great in this offense... But if they were willing to give up a 1st, I wish it would've been on a legit pass rusher. It would've helped the DBs, freed up Mathis, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irsay alluded to Grigs rolling the dice. And I agree it is especially if we have a miserable season, but after the top 5? It's hit or miss for a lot of players in the first round anyways.

I think we've seen time and time again that first round pick doesn't equate to a first round quality of player.

This I can agree with we seem awfully free and easy with trading picks sometimes, when you look at the stockpilers like the 49ers and Pats they can afford to draft risky players as they have more dice rolls.

The proof is in the pudding I guess, I still worry about the O line big time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On around the league they think the Browns got rid Richardson because he is beat up and has a lot of mileage and that the Colts are desperate. GROUND and POUND here we come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Ravens fan, and presumably a Flacco fan, I would think you'd be wiser than focusing in on just one game to draw any conclusions about a guy.

Just pointing out stats. I actually like the trade for the Colts, and also the Ravens. That game in Cleveland just got a bit easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see. 

 

We currently have a running back coming of a foot injury that is signed for 1 year. 

 

We have another that is on the last year of his contract and probably won't be re-signed. 

 

We have another that just blew up his knee and we have no idea how he'll be when he returns. 

 

So we go out and grab a guy who was a top-5 pick and who could become our answer at RB for the next 6-7 years for a pick around what.....20th or so?  And some people are complaining? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

 

The game is radically different than it was 13 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Colts can make the playoffs, or get very close to it, that draft pick would be worth it for Trent.

 

If they have a bad year, it's more questionable.

 

However, now the Colts get a legit running back who has the potential to be a top 10 player in the NFL (although maybe not with the Colts). It's a great trade for fans, the team and everyone. The Browns almost guarantee a bad season now.

 

I think this is a very good trade. Trent Richardson was a top 3 pick last year and had top 10 talent. This has crazy potential written all over it.

 

I LOVE IT!!!!! I'm just very surprised right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm both excited and kinda of concerned about this trade. Hopefully Trent can make a HUGE difference in the running and blocking game for us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Return to feeling down about GTA V.

That games incredible.

 

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I thought this was an April Fool's Day joke when I first read it but then I remembered that it's September. haha

My brother in law is a Browns fan, as if that a worse enough fate, they just lost their star player. However it's not hard to be a star for the Browns lol.

I'm hoping he can live up to potential, but we will see. He's skilled enough, but that doesn't always translate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First round picks are worshiped. But they're not all that hot after the 1-10 round really.

It's because it's a running back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my god, I'm ok with it if we are picking in the mid twenties again. If we are picking in the mid teens, I don't know, have my doubts to me this is a wait and see! I guess I'll just have to trust in Gregie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

haha sorry buddy. But rest assured when you track down a copy, you will be far far from disappointed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consider it this way:

Richardson was the 3rd overall pick and certainly a top 5 player in that draft.  Our first round pick in 2014 is likely to be after 20.  So we went from 20 to get a top 5 player.  If he can stay healthy, this will be an incredible deal

AND he will most certainly replace Donald Brown who was a 1st round bust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Ravens fan, and presumably a Flacco fan, I would think you'd be wiser than focusing in on just one game to draw any conclusions about a guy.

 

Think again he focused on the Ravens game      

   First, then the fins  .so technically  its 2 games .. :rock:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see. 

 

We currently have a running back coming of a foot injury that is signed for 1 year. 

 

We have another that is on the last year of his contract and probably won't be re-signed. 

 

We have another that just blew up his knee and we have no idea how he'll be when he returns. 

 

So we go out and grab a guy who was a top-5 pick and who could become our answer at RB for the next 6-7 years for a pick around what.....20th or so?  And some people are complaining? 

 

Great post! You put it all in perspective!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently browns fans are furious and is demanding more then a 1st, maybe grigs did good again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha sorry buddy. But rest assured when you track down a copy, you will be far far from disappointed.

 

haha I know. I watch gameplay vids everyday on youtube. Can't wait

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because it's a running back

If this season becomes a top 5 pick season, this move is a disaster. However, if we pick in the range we did this year, and Richardson pans out. That's a very solid trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first trade or acquisition the Colts have made in a long time where the Colts got a BEAST.

 

No, Caesar Rayford, or any of the free agent pickups were made are/were not beasts.

 

Trent's a beast. This is probably the 2nd biggest trade in Indy Colts history. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother in law is a Browns fan, as if that a worse enough fate, they just lost their star player. However it's not hard to be a star for the Browns lol.

I'm hoping he can live up to potential, but we will see. He's skilled enough, but that doesn't always translate.

Yeah, I was gonna say that the Browns traded their best player but then I remembered Joe Haden. They must want to run out of QBs before the season's over, because Hoyer is going to be killed without the threat of the run game and Weeden is already out. You're right, we'll have to wait and see if Richardson's talent transfers over to Hamilton's pass-first offense. Should be interesting to see if he plays Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are complaining, Colts got a steal here. Cleveland is nuts, they gave up 3 picks to move up to get him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

House, I hope your computer catches a virus. And your GTA spontaneous combusts in your system -___-

Wait did you not get GTA or something TK? If it makes you feel better I have it, but it's still in the shrink wrap because I haven't time to play it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ill win this argument easily

rarely do you see sure fire first round picks like luck

we just got a sure fire rb and know what he is capable of

 

nobody and I tell you nobody is a sure fire pick where the colts pick next year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, I agree, I agree.

 

But Richardson is a really good back, better than anyone we've had since 2000 Edgerrin James. There's upside now, but giving up a first is strange. We had better make the playoffs, otherwise that pick is going to be much more valuable than the player.

 

 

i think you nay sayers are wrong on this one. Richardson has been nicked up and playing for a team where opponents played mostly 8 in the box. He should be better than what we would have available in 2014 draft. I wonder how much of the 13 mill in signing bonus the Browns eat ? I looked at various cap sites and cannot find anything more than 13 mill prorated over 4 years. Could it be that they have to eat the whole bonus ? I don't see anything that says part was a roster bonus in later years.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the people complaining need to stop. we got a sure fire rb in trent r. and he finally gives the colts that dynamic attack they have been missing since edgerrin james left.

Just told my wife the exact same thing.  I prefaced it with 1st round bust Donald Brown.  GO COLTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 420

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...