Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NCost12

Breaking news: Colts trade for Trent Richardson (((merge)))

Recommended Posts

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what on earth the Browns are thinking?! You don't trade a franchise RB like TR.

 

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My confidence in Grigson just plummeted

 

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're likely picking in the teens anyway. To get a top 5 or at worst top 10 talent like TR is amazing! 

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

 

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

 

You're right. I'm just so hyped right now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure quite what to think about this move......

 

I need to digest it and think it over. I am not sure I like the idea of giving up a first rounder though if we don't make the playoffs. If we make the playoffs then I might not mind but we have a really tough schedule ahead of us here.

 

Seems Irsay/Grigson won't give up on this team either. They really want it to succeed......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an okay move, that could turn up gold or bust. 

 

On a side note Trent is killing my fantasy team..I hope he doesn't kill our team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is definitely a HUUUUGE deal, but it's also rather silly.

Not silly at all for Cleveland....they will now probably get the 1st pick overall in 2014...hello, Johnny Football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade Bradshaw to the steelers now??? Lol idk. Guys we have the 1st ovr pick in the 2012 draft and the 3rd... lollol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if I like giving up a first rounder but he has so much potential, really needs to stay healthy.  He is a major upgrade to Ballard and will be great with Bradshaw.

 

If he stays healthy we should have a great QB and RB.

 

Unlike most on this forum the commitment to the run is not all that exciting considering this league is a passing league and unless you have a shutdown D you will have to pass the ball.

 

Either way I like the move and I think it makes us a much better team, we will be a force in the very near future which for me is 2014.  This year I expect good things but I had tempered my expectations before the season.

 

I like where we are headed GO COLTS :blueshoe:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont want to make, so who will do it?

An official Fire Grigson thread needs to be made after this. God help him if this ends up being a top 5 or 10 pick. He seems to be overrating this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

 

I'm excited about getting a really good, potentially GREAT player, but I'm very dissatisfied if we really gave up a first rounder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

Greg Cowan@GregCowanCA2m

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

I don't think the Ballard injury was an expected one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

 

Thank you Ryan Grigson for explaining your actions. We appreciate you!

 

In Grigson we TRUST!!

 

*Salutes* :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

It wont be a top 10 pick. We're picked 15-20. Maybe lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

 

 

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

I agree, I agree, I agree.

 

But Richardson is a really good back, better than anyone we've had since 2000 Edgerrin James. There's upside now, but giving up a first is strange. We had better make the playoffs, otherwise that pick is going to be much more valuable than the player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

The most important ability is... what again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

 

 

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

Wonder if they'll give us Joe Haden too. I think he's a pretty good CB. Or even give us a pass rusher or hey, Joe Thomas or one of their other good lineman :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hughes Brown Gonzalez where first round picks, so I rather trade for a starting RB then strike out completely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said, it's never about "can you fit under the cap?", or "do you spend all your cap space?" Because you can fit under the cap certainly. Actually, you have to, that's the rule. And most teams do spend their cap space. That's the point. Use it all if possible. The Patriots use it all usually, the Steelers use it all usually, etc. Most teams do. Actually, the Colts do use almost all of their 2019 cap space too. (The 2019 total sum of contracts is a bit over 184 million, just a few mills under the cap. That "40ish cap space" is already nothing else but the rollovers from previous years.)   But, even with spending all the cap space, there is good cap management, and there is bad cap management. The Patriots spend all of their cap space, and they manage it very effectively. The Colts (now) spend all of their (excluding rollover), and I belive Ballard manages the cap very effectively. But the Jags didn't. They went over the line, and sacrifized their future effectiveness by getting into bidding wars and signing pricey free agents one after another. The problem wasn't Norwell. If it was only him, that would be ok. The problem was, that they also signed Moncrief for 10M, Jenkins for 6M, Church for 7M, traded for Hyde and payed him 4M and he barely saw the field, etc, etc. The list is very long.      I never said that having elite talents heading into their second contract is a burden. You are right, that is a blessing. Actually, that is the best that can happen to a team. That's what Ballard want's to do! The problem is, that the Jaguars got into a situation, when there is a very good chance that they cannot sign their own guys. And their roster got thin, because they could not refill it this offseason enough. They got worse. And they will become even worse in 2020, because they won't be able to retain their talent level. Yes, they can cut Campbell, they can cut Bouye, and they can trade Ngakogue, and fit under the cap. And then? Who will play at CB, who will play at DE? A mediocre somebody. So, instead of improving their team, they actually made it worse. That's the bad management. Cap wise and talent wise as well. (However, I do agree, that they kinda draft OK recently - one year exceptionally well, but still OK since then, so their talent infusion is somewhat OK. What they screwed up big time is cap management.)   Btw, this is an old story repeating itself. Coughlin has been with the Jags before. And he drove them into cap hell before. It was bad, it cost them years to recover. He's just doing it all over again. He is (was) a very good coach, but terrible at managing the cap.
    • https://www.1070thefan.com/blogs/kevins-corner/colts-coverage/colts-say-no-trade-offers-sticking-jacoby-brissett-backup?fbclid=IwAR0IGDgC2r_pBbt7tUzbQjxiBv0zfXiUyxQtxziGhcsvuaRHI3Or6xVIT74   I like Reich's quotes here:  “It’s impossible for me to have a higher opinion of Jacoby than I do,” Reich says. “I said it last year, I think he’s a top 20 quarterback. I still say that. After watching him for a year, this guy’s really good.   “I tell Chris all the time, ‘Please don’t let him go. I don’t care what anybody offers him. Don’t let him go.’ I love Jacoby. The problem is now I’ve gotten to know Jacoby and, at some point, I hope that it works out for Jacoby. But not now.”
    • How is the number of UDFAs significant to anything?     For the record, the Colts actually signed 11 UDFAs...JAC signed 21.    BTW, here are some of the "better teams" and the number of UDFAs this year:   HOU - 20 KC - 23 CHI - 22 NO -17 LAR - 19 LAC - 19   I see no clear correlation between "better teams", thin rosters and UDFAs. There is more of a correlation between the number of draft picks and UDFAs, if anything. Those teams typically had less draft picks...and therefore...more roster spots to give to UDFAs. And UDFAs understand this as well...and see a better path to making a roster if a draft pick is not in their way.   In 2018, the Colts...in the first year of a new offensive and defensive scheme...coming off a 4-win season...signed only 10 UDFAs...because they had 11 draft picks...which makes sense. But that roster was by no means deep.  
    • I suspect, knowing Ballard to date, he is a guy who knew all about all the candidates including Reich, but I think @Valpo2004 did a good job breaking it down.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...