Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NCost12

Breaking news: Colts trade for Trent Richardson (((merge)))

Recommended Posts

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what on earth the Browns are thinking?! You don't trade a franchise RB like TR.

 

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My confidence in Grigson just plummeted

 

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're likely picking in the teens anyway. To get a top 5 or at worst top 10 talent like TR is amazing! 

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

 

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

 

You're right. I'm just so hyped right now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure quite what to think about this move......

 

I need to digest it and think it over. I am not sure I like the idea of giving up a first rounder though if we don't make the playoffs. If we make the playoffs then I might not mind but we have a really tough schedule ahead of us here.

 

Seems Irsay/Grigson won't give up on this team either. They really want it to succeed......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an okay move, that could turn up gold or bust. 

 

On a side note Trent is killing my fantasy team..I hope he doesn't kill our team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is definitely a HUUUUGE deal, but it's also rather silly.

Not silly at all for Cleveland....they will now probably get the 1st pick overall in 2014...hello, Johnny Football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade Bradshaw to the steelers now??? Lol idk. Guys we have the 1st ovr pick in the 2012 draft and the 3rd... lollol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if I like giving up a first rounder but he has so much potential, really needs to stay healthy.  He is a major upgrade to Ballard and will be great with Bradshaw.

 

If he stays healthy we should have a great QB and RB.

 

Unlike most on this forum the commitment to the run is not all that exciting considering this league is a passing league and unless you have a shutdown D you will have to pass the ball.

 

Either way I like the move and I think it makes us a much better team, we will be a force in the very near future which for me is 2014.  This year I expect good things but I had tempered my expectations before the season.

 

I like where we are headed GO COLTS :blueshoe:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont want to make, so who will do it?

An official Fire Grigson thread needs to be made after this. God help him if this ends up being a top 5 or 10 pick. He seems to be overrating this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

 

I'm excited about getting a really good, potentially GREAT player, but I'm very dissatisfied if we really gave up a first rounder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

Greg Cowan@GregCowanCA2m

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

I don't think the Ballard injury was an expected one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

 

Thank you Ryan Grigson for explaining your actions. We appreciate you!

 

In Grigson we TRUST!!

 

*Salutes* :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

It wont be a top 10 pick. We're picked 15-20. Maybe lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

 

 

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

I agree, I agree, I agree.

 

But Richardson is a really good back, better than anyone we've had since 2000 Edgerrin James. There's upside now, but giving up a first is strange. We had better make the playoffs, otherwise that pick is going to be much more valuable than the player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

The most important ability is... what again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

 

 

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

Wonder if they'll give us Joe Haden too. I think he's a pretty good CB. Or even give us a pass rusher or hey, Joe Thomas or one of their other good lineman :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hughes Brown Gonzalez where first round picks, so I rather trade for a starting RB then strike out completely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 420

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaveA1102

      DaveA1102 1,864

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...