Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

NCost12

Breaking news: Colts trade for Trent Richardson (((merge)))

Recommended Posts

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what on earth the Browns are thinking?! You don't trade a franchise RB like TR.

 

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My confidence in Grigson just plummeted

 

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're likely picking in the teens anyway. To get a top 5 or at worst top 10 talent like TR is amazing! 

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

 

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing anymore. Adrian Peterson is the lone exception.

 

You're right. I'm just so hyped right now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure quite what to think about this move......

 

I need to digest it and think it over. I am not sure I like the idea of giving up a first rounder though if we don't make the playoffs. If we make the playoffs then I might not mind but we have a really tough schedule ahead of us here.

 

Seems Irsay/Grigson won't give up on this team either. They really want it to succeed......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an okay move, that could turn up gold or bust. 

 

On a side note Trent is killing my fantasy team..I hope he doesn't kill our team. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is definitely a HUUUUGE deal, but it's also rather silly.

Not silly at all for Cleveland....they will now probably get the 1st pick overall in 2014...hello, Johnny Football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade Bradshaw to the steelers now??? Lol idk. Guys we have the 1st ovr pick in the 2012 draft and the 3rd... lollol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if I like giving up a first rounder but he has so much potential, really needs to stay healthy.  He is a major upgrade to Ballard and will be great with Bradshaw.

 

If he stays healthy we should have a great QB and RB.

 

Unlike most on this forum the commitment to the run is not all that exciting considering this league is a passing league and unless you have a shutdown D you will have to pass the ball.

 

Either way I like the move and I think it makes us a much better team, we will be a force in the very near future which for me is 2014.  This year I expect good things but I had tempered my expectations before the season.

 

I like where we are headed GO COLTS :blueshoe:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont want to make, so who will do it?

An official Fire Grigson thread needs to be made after this. God help him if this ends up being a top 5 or 10 pick. He seems to be overrating this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This move doesn't undo all the good he's done, but I don't like it. I like the player, he makes us better, but I hate that we gave up a first rounder.

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

 

I'm excited about getting a really good, potentially GREAT player, but I'm very dissatisfied if we really gave up a first rounder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats true...im not sure how to feel right now. he is supposed to be pretty good, he is a top 5 talent. on teh other hand he is injured a lot. Also, why the heck did we sign Bradshaw for?

if we pick in the teens i guess if he keeps healthy this would be great deal but man.. i dotn know haha

Greg Cowan@GregCowanCA2m

really, really possible. RT @NateDunlevy Sure hope they didn't just deal a top-10 pick. I believe it's possible.

I don't think the Ballard injury was an expected one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gonna need some time to digest this one.  Can't really say it was a terrible pick.  He's a 2nd year guy, I mean, it's not like we gave up a first for a 28 year old.  And if we end up middle of the draft next year, probably would have been a steal, but we gotta hit on our later draft picks.

 

Thank you Ryan Grigson for explaining your actions. We appreciate you!

 

In Grigson we TRUST!!

 

*Salutes* :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People drastically overvalue first round draft picks.

Never quite understood it myself.

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

It wont be a top 10 pick. We're picked 15-20. Maybe lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giving up a first rounder for a RB is the problem I have with it....it boggles my mind.

 

 

Right, and the issue with this team on O is the OL.   Not the RB position.     UGHHH..

 

oh well...    we shall see.

 

I do not like coughing up draft picks for "under preforming" FORMER draft picks.

 

I agree, I agree, I agree.

 

But Richardson is a really good back, better than anyone we've had since 2000 Edgerrin James. There's upside now, but giving up a first is strange. We had better make the playoffs, otherwise that pick is going to be much more valuable than the player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

The most important ability is... what again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually don't like taking rbs in the first round, but TRich is a special talent. 

 

The problem isnt his ability. It's his ability to stay healthy.

 

 

Exactly. The draft is a crapshoot. With TR we know what we get.

 

 

Well this one has the "potential" to be a really NICE one...    if it turns out to be in the late teens to twenties ..  cool.

 

But if it is top 10......    ughhhhhhhh

 

Lots of iffsssss

 

Wonder if they'll give us Joe Haden too. I think he's a pretty good CB. Or even give us a pass rusher or hey, Joe Thomas or one of their other good lineman :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hughes Brown Gonzalez where first round picks, so I rather trade for a starting RB then strike out completely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 23

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,807

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 416

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Jammer

      Jared Jammer 97

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...