Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts bid for 2018 Super Bowl


Recommended Posts

I remember a few here saying that Indy made little money on the Super Bowl.

Note the numbers in this article..(Colts.com) and comments from near downtown and away from downtown.

 

 

  Indy to bid of 2018 Super Bowl

 

INDIANAPOLIS (8-30-13) The chance to again bask in the national spotlight and pump millions of dollars into the local economy was too tempting to pass up.

On the upper terrace of Lucas Oil Stadium overlooking the sun-splashed Downtown skyline, community leaders announced Friday that they will pursue a bid to bring the Super Bowl back to Indianapolis. And they plan to make the experience bigger and better than when the city last hosted the big game.

“We raised the bar in 2012,” Gov. Mike Pence said to applause. “We are going to do it again when Super Bowl LII comes to Indiana in 2018.”

Community leaders believe Indianapolis’ acclaimed Super Bowl XLVI put the city in position to earn another bid. Super Bowl success translated to more than feel-good sentiments from the national mediaicon1.png and fans thrilled by taking a zip line down Capital Ave., watching a concert along Georgia Street or throwing back drinks at area bars in a walkable Downtown.

Event organizers estimate the city gained $176 million in direct economic impact and more than 250 hours of national and international television exposure. They think a second Super Bowl would have an even larger impact.

 

 

Kurt Rankin, an economist with PNC Financial Services Group, agreed Indianapolis should expect better results with a second Super Bowl. The economy should be stronger six years from now, he said. But more than that, Indianapolis’ intentions to go big should mean more dollars.

“I would expect if things are going to be bigger and better,” he said, “then the economic impact will be bigger and better.”

A bigger windfall is not guaranteed. Detroit’s economy garnered only $113 million in 2006 as winter storms shut down the city. Indianapolis, a fellow cold-weather location, could be one blizzard away from the same outcome.

Still, Rankin said seeking the Super Bowl is a wise move, and he noted that $113 million still is a lot of money.

 

 

“If Detroit made money on bringing the game in even during a storm, I think it’s a smarticon1.png move to try to bring it in.”

The economic impact for the Indianapolis area included transportation, meals, entertainment, tourism services and businessicon1.png services. While hotel rooms were booked across Central Indiana, no one felt a more direct impact than businesses within easy reach of the Super Bowl Village.

(Page 2 of 3)
 

Andrea Smith, general manager at The Tilted Kilt, 141 S. Meridian St., said she had never seen the place so packed. The lines extended out the door.

“We loved it,” she said. “We had a very good response from guests that were out of town, just talking about the friendliness and how great and close everything was.”

Jeff Smith, owner of Harry & Izzy’s, 153 S Illinois St., said his restaurant had never been so crowded. The excitement and energy in the crowd was breathtaking, he said, and community leaders did a good job of keeping it organized.

“Everybody really enjoyed Hoosier Hospitality,” he said. “It really was something. People were raving about Indianapolis.”

 

Not everyone experienced such success, though. Too far from the epicenter of the Super Bowl Village, districts such as Broad Ripple, Fountain Square and Mass Ave. saw little or no gain in business.

They had anticipated big crowds but were left feeling flat. Broad Ripple community organizers spent $182,000 to erect a 1,000-person tent with free live music during Super Bowl weekend, but few fans trickled into the venue.

David Andrichik, owner of the Chatterbox on Mass Ave., said he ordered extra liquor and frozen food but had few extra customersicon1.png to enjoy it.

Andrichik hopes the city wins the Super Bowl bid in 2018. He just won’t ramp up the business again.

Craig Von Deylen, owner of the Murphy Building at Fountain Square, would love to see the city gain the national spotlight again.

Colder weather, he thinks, might persuade tourists to drive farther from Downtown.

 

“The city did such a great job with the Super Bowl Village,” he said, “there was hardly any reason for people to leave that area.”

Ken Ungar, president and founder of Indianapolis-based U/S Sports Advisors, a sports marketing firm, said the Super Bowl Host Committee might find a way to better incorporate other neighborhood districts in 2018.

But, he said, the walkable Super Bowl Village drew raves. The city, he said, should build on that success. He’s curious to see what event organizers will plan.

 
“The attitude that I’ve seen from the Super Bowl Host Committee is we have to raise the bar higher,” he said. “I have little doubt that this will be more special than the first one.”

The Super Bowl, he said, helped solidify Indianapolis’ brand as a good place to live, visit and do business. Seeking a second Super Bowl, he said, is smart.

“I think the brand impact on the city is very important,” he said. “It highlights that we are a can-do city.”

Hosting the event is an expensive venture. Allison Melangton, chairwoman of the 2018 Super Bowl Bid Committee, said the city will need to raise $30 million for a successful bid. Last time, the city used money to invest in a number of Legacyicon1.png urban improvement projects to spark the East Side, including the $11 million Chase Near Eastside Legacy Center opened on Tech High School's campus.

Plans for whatever would constitute a repeat performance are being kept secret. Melangton said she doesn’t want details of Indianapolis’ bid for 2018 to reach the ears of competitor cities. She would only say the committee would aim higher.

She thinks community donors will step forward again to fund the bid.

“I would say that we believe we can do it,” she said, “or we wouldn’t be up here.”

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I pick C as well......as underwhelming and disappointing as the last few seasons have ended, they have achieved quite a bit and broke the curse. They’ll start clicking again just in a rut right now.   GoCubsGo!
    • Left tackle all the way for me with the 1st pick.   No messing around with that position.  Biggest need happens to match up with a strong class.  Not rocket science here.  Wentz and Ballard will say thank you very much and on to round two.
    • I have harped on this for awhile, but I believe Ojulari is one of the best 2 pass rushers in this draft, along with Jaelan Phllips. Phillips however has medical concerns, which may scare Ballard off.   Ojulari on the other hand, has explosive ability and long arms which Ballard loves, has improved each year at Georgia, and I believe he could play as both an OLB in a 3-4 and as a DE in a 4-3.    https://www.nflanalysis.net/colts-will-strongly-consider-azeez-ojulari-at-no-21-in-nfl-draft/  
    • I don't know where there are 'big ole fat holes' in the roster.    Yes, losing AC stinks, but Ballard has gotten a few serviceable players in FA who will at least provide solid depth, if not be able to step in a be decent starters.  This draft is pretty deep at OT and my guess is we'll see one added there (plus, I won't be shocked if Ballard and Co. are fairly high on Pinter and O'Donnell as developing players along with Tevi and Davenport from FA).  A whole here, but Ballard's already addressed it to some extent and we have a long way to go before preseason even starts.   Our edge position on the DL is a bit concerning, but I think Isaac Rochell reminds me a bit of Autry when we signed Autry.  Houston is still out there and it sounds like Ballard was talking to him just a week or so ago - my guess is Ballard gave him a range (price and length) of contract where the Colts will play within and after talking to a few other teams Houston will come back and negotiate with us to stick around on a 1-2 year deal (or he'll find a team that overpays him and walk).  Again, this draft seems pretty strong on rush ends, and my guess is Ballard is not done attacking this position.  That said, my biggest concern here is health - if healthy, I think Lewis, Turay, Rochell, and Muhammad are serviceable DEs (not great) and we're not terrible there - with the addition of Houston, that's a fairly solid unit - if Banogu somehow really emerges that's a huge plus and if we get Houston back and bring in a guy via draft, we're probably fine at that spot so long as Turay and Lewis can stay healthy.   Our TE group is not great, but with Doyle and MAC we have a fairly solid 1-2 group here.  I'd really like to see us add an explosive playmaker (MAC showed flashes last year as did Burton if we bring him back, and I think Doyle's a solid all-around TE, though not the explosive guy I want).  Not many very good TEs left in FA (could get a decent guy like Jordan Reed or Tyler Eifert on a short contract) and after Pitts, I don't see many who I'm sold on as receiving threats in the draft... either way, our TE play was OK last year and if we go into the season with Doyle, MAC, Farrod Green and others on our current roster, I don't see it as a 'big ole fat hole.'   Our WR group, with the resigning of TY should be solid.... Pittman, if he continues to develop, along with TY and Pascal are a formidable top 3 -- if Campbell is healthy and we get solid development from our 5-6 guys (assuming we don't draft or sign any other WRs), I think we're solid going into the season with Pittman, TY, Pascal, Campbell, Patmon and Dulin/Harris.  If Campbell stays healthy and Patmon emerges, that could be an elite group compared to rest of the league.  I won't be shocked if we go after another playmaker in the draft, but this unit isn't a 'big ole fat hole.'   With Wentz and Eason at QB, we should be solid.  My guess is we'll bring in a guy like Hoyer or some other cheaper vet as a 3rd QB... my main concern is Wentz staying healthy, but I think if he does, he'll bounce back fine with a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich.     LBs we should be fine - wouldn't mind adding a bit more competition, but I'm not seeing that as a hole.     DBs, we had solid play from Willis and for the most part Blackmon at S, so we should be OK there - at least no worse than last year and I won't be shocked if we add another player or if Marvell Tell helps at S.  We have Rhodes back at DB, and Kenny Moore II returning in the slot.  I am not very worried about Ya-Sin (I see why other people are, but I don't think last year was as bad as people make it out to be for him and I think he's got the work ethic and mental toughness to continue improving), Tell should help CBs if he doesn't move to S... the loss of Carrie isn't great, but our secondary isn't really a 'big ole hole.'   All in all, I think Ballard has faith in his coaching staff and his younger players that they'll keep developing.  We have a very solid young core.  Like every team (except maybe the Bucs), we have some question marks... but we have a long off-season left ahead of us and I have no doubt that this team will be ready to compete for the AFC South title by the time Ballard gets through the draft and remaining FA.     You don't know (nor does anyone on this board as a fan) if guys like Villenueva, etc. have been 'absolutely' willing to take 1 year deals at this point.  My guess is, they don't want to do that and they're feeling the market out... as we get closer to the draft, it's not like the market is getting better for some of the vets out there.  I don't know that we don't have a league average LT on our roster among Davenport, Tevi, ODonnell and Pinter, TBH - but if Ballard's not comfy with any of them, we can still get a guy like Villenueva or draft one -- this happens to be a very deep OT draft.   At DE, I agree with @Supermanthat Lawson's contract was a bit overpriced for a guy who gets pressure but not sacks.  Muhammad who we got back (for 1/5 of Lawson's annual amount) gets pressure as well, you pay guys at DE >$15+ mil/year when they are able to turn pressures into sacks.  Houston is still out there, and my guess is we bring him back on a 1-2 year deal (likely for no more than Lawson and Houston is a far more productive rush end).  If we do that, our DE position is fine and edge is pretty deep in this year's draft should we address it there.   I don't really think anything Ballard's done is going to prevent him from going BPA with some limitations (e.g., with Wentz and Eason at QB, we're likely not going to take a QB in the first 3 rounds, nor are we likely to draft a C, etc.).  The draft has multiple OT who should be able to come in and start from day 1 within the first few rounds.  The edge group is pretty deep.  The WR is very deep.  
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 4,271

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WentzinRome

      WentzinRome 10

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan77

      coltsfan77 29

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 2,333

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 6,628

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • James Sturgill

      James Sturgill 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BillHill

      BillHill 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 8,535

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 1,501

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FRW

      FRW 125

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...