Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

same old D same OLine


ruf

Recommended Posts

I really thought our backups would be better this year. does anyone who is watching this game see anything positive to report.

 

I'm not seeing any of the names on the D side making plays that I thought would be so much improvement.

 

Are we getting any pass rush?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It is hard to take anything away from this. We don't really create a specific game plan until the final preseason game. It is going to take time for these guys to get together. Our initial run D looked OK outside of those 1st two big runs by Spiller. The DBs looked decent. 

 

Our O-line is going to take some time to gel. I personally think 2 of the players that started today may not start after the bye week (Satele, McGlynn). We shall see.......1st preseason game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to take anything away from this. We don't really create a specific game plan until the final preseason game. It is going to take time for these guys to get together. Our initial run D looked OK outside of those 1st two big runs by Spiller. The DBs looked decent. 

 

Our O-line is going to take some time to gel. I personally think 2 of the players that started today may not start after the bye week (Satele, McGlynn). We shall see.......1st preseason game.

Even if Thornton and or Holmes start before the year is out, which I do think is possible, they aren't in all likely hood going to be an instant fix.  I think people need to remember the o-line is still a work in progress.  What I am looking for and hoping for is improvement over last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to take anything away from this. We don't really create a specific game plan until the final preseason game. It is going to take time for these guys to get together. Our initial run D looked OK outside of those 1st two big runs by Spiller. The DBs looked decent. 

 

Our O-line is going to take some time to gel. I personally think 2 of the players that started today may not start after the bye week (Satele, McGlynn). We shall see.......1st preseason game.

You probably meant the 3rd preseason game. Even then, there won't be much of a gameplan.

I was disappointed that Chapman didn't get in until late, but Tavaseu looked okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to take anything away from this. We don't really create a specific game plan until the final preseason game. It is going to take time for these guys to get together. Our initial run D looked OK outside of those 1st two big runs by Spiller. The DBs looked decent. 

 

Our O-line is going to take some time to gel. I personally think 2 of the players that started today may not start after the bye week (Satele, McGlynn). We shall see.......1st preseason game.

And I guess the Bills created a specific game plan against us? the run D gave their started 9 yards a carry. hope your right about Satele and McGlynn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of the first two runs of the game, the starting D played pretty well, now after they came out D had a dropoff

OLine was mostly communication issues even with Luck messing up a cadence

I wish Josh McNary was healthy enough to play this week, have to wait until next game to see McNary and Werner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be careful, they will call you names for speaking the truth.

I think the depth chart is out of wack. Some of the better players dont start, and I dont get it.

maybe you should send in your resume. With your insight, you will be hired on the spot I'm sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be careful, they will call you names for speaking the truth.

I think the depth chart is out of wack. Some of the better players dont start, and I dont get it.

 

No.    Names get called when people sound ignorant.

 

That said -- and I'm not calling you ignorant -- would you like to complete your thought? 

 

Who are the better players who don't start that you don't understand?     Off the top of my head, Chapman was the only one I could think of,  and I suspect that's more of a veteran vs. rookie thing.    And it's only the first week of pre-season.   Things change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and most of his completions came against the 2nd and 3rd strings in the latter part of the first half.  We took our starters out much sooner than they did.  Also, it's preseason.  We're playing a very passive defense, and they're getting a lot of short completions.  C'mon man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.    Names get called when people sound ignorant.

 

That said -- and I'm not calling you ignorant -- would you like to complete your thought? 

 

Who are the better players who don't start that you don't understand?     Off the top of my head, Chapman was the only one I could think of,  and I suspect that's more of a veteran vs. rookie thing.    And it's only the first week of pre-season.   Things change.

Honestly I haven't heard anything from Chapman today.  I'll admit I am not paying the closet attention to the game at this point but I just haven't heard his name.  Franklin on the other hand had a fumble recovery and looked alright when he was in there.  From what I've seen, and I am no coach, I haven't seen anything that would make me flip them on the depth chart.  With that said, as you said it's pre-season game one things can and will change and the coaches are for sure seeing things that we will never see that they will make these decisions off of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I haven't heard anything from Chapman today.  I'll admit I am not paying the closet attention to the game at this point but I just haven't heard his name.  Franklin on the other hand had a fumble recovery and looked alright when he was in there.  From what I've seen, and I am no coach, I haven't seen anything that would make me flip them on the depth chart.  With that said, as you said it's pre-season game one things can and will change and the coaches are for sure seeing things that we will never see that they will make these decisions off of.

Chapman is third man up at NT. He's not tearing it up, but he's holding his own. Probably against third stringers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and I forgot to mention the special teams (horrible).

what happen to the FB we were suppose to have for a power running game to pick up some first downs?

We used him quite a bit when the starters were in there.  What I saw from our offense was Pep trying a lot of different looks probably trying to get an idea of what exactly worked and didn't work in a game.  Keep in mind it's the pre-season, there is no game plan and even if there was the Colts are going to do their best to keep from giving away too much in the pre-season.  They are using the pre-season to see what works and doesn't work and my guess is they will use that information to formulate game planes for the regular season based off that information. 

 

Also the Colts keep saying they want to run the ball more and have balance, they have never said they were going to become a running team.  They have Andrew Luck as their QB with a Hall of Fame WR in Reggie Wayne with three offensive rookies taken at TE and WR with their next three draft picks last year.  They are still going to throw the ball a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Names get called when people sound ignorant.

That said -- and I'm not calling you ignorant -- would you like to complete your thought?

Who are the better players who don't start that you don't understand? Off the top of my head, Chapman was the only one I could think of, and I suspect that's more of a veteran vs. rookie thing. And it's only the first week of pre-season. Things change.

Hilton. They refuse to recognize him as the #2 wr. Then anyone is better than Satele and McGlynn. Also last yr they did it. Ballard was better than Brown pretty early on, but he was a backup. Shipley played the best out of all the linmen and he was benched and traded away.

I will wait till the rookies are healthy before I lose hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chapman is third man up at NT. He's not tearing it up, but he's holding his own. Probably against third stringers though.

My guess is that he'll have to do more than that to move into the starting line up then.  People have a tendency to see more of what they want to see when it comes to players they like or don't like (and I am not saying you are doing that) and Chapman is a guy that a lot of fans like and want to be the answer to our NT problems.  So they are looking for him to be that.  While he could grow into that in time I am trying to remember this pretty much his rookie season so that might take a little time.  Coaches tend to see what is there based off their philosophies.  Right now based on what I've seen I have no real issues with Pagano's depth chart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really thought our backups would be better this year. does anyone who is watching this game see anything positive to report.

 

I'm not seeing any of the names on the D side making plays that I thought would be so much improvement.

 

Are we getting any pass rush?

I think the defense looked pretty solid today. The starting defense that is..

After the first series the line bounced back and looked wonderful against the run. The players were active and all over the ball.

Landry and Werner didn't play. We're still waiting for a few guys to come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that he'll have to do more than that to move into the starting line up then.  People have a tendency to see more of what they want to see when it comes to players they like or don't like (and I am not saying you are doing that) and Chapman is a guy that a lot of fans like and want to be the answer to our NT problems.  So they are looking for him to be that.  While he could grow into that in time I am trying to remember this pretty much his rookie season so that might take a little time.  Coaches tend to see what is there based off their philosophies.  Right now based on what I've seen I have no real issues with Pagano's depth chart.

I've always said we should temper our expectations for Chapman. He was a good player at Bama, not a game changer. And that's a hard position to learn in the pros. He'll be okay, just needs time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't you watch the game? FBs were used extensively.

Yes STs are horrible.

Kicking games looked (in terms of the kickers) and Hilton had a really nice punt return.  Kick coverage units and the kick returner game are a mess right now but I think we could have probably guessed at least the latter one going in.

 

I will say this we probably don't know what the special teams are going to look like yet.  The Colts will put those together based on who is left on the roster after the final cuts.  They are looking for guys to make an impact right now and then put them together so they might not play their first game as a true "unit" till game one of the regular season.  With that said other than Conner on one tackle I would agree I haven't seen anyone who has made an impact on special teams as of yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was so excited about chapman and the way he pushed 4 of our OL down on one play, and the best he can do is hold his own against their 3rd string. this really tells me it was more our OL that is so weak was the reason he was able to do that in practice against our first string OL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we bash the defense remember that pretty much all of our safeties were out that we opened camp with including Laundry who was a starter, I don't think I saw Werner out there at all, Freeman and Angerer were both out hurt along with Harvey and McNary. 

 

They were pretty beat up.  Also the starters did alright when they were in there and that's what you want to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the first preseason game is like a glorified practice

FB/TEs were used much more with Luck and Hasselbeck because we already know they can sling the rock. You saw more multiple WR and spread formations with Harnisch because they want to see what he can do throwing the ball. There is no real gameplan whatsoever. About the only thing to really look at is whether or not an individual player is executing his assignment and beating the man in front of him, and if he isn't, is it a talent problem, or an opportunity to coach?

It is't really about winning (though its nice) more than its about putting players in specific situations for purposes of assessment.

good to have football back...brings out the 'Chicken Little's' and entertains the rest of us. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not jumping to any conclusions today. It is week one of the Preseason! No I am not worried at this point... But if we can't get pressure on Matt Flynn week 1 or stop injury prone McFadden then I will begin to worry. For now lets stay calm and let the roster take shape and give team time to come together.

 

 

However, I still think ST's are awful.. Something about special teams in Indy :scratch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we bash the defense remember that pretty much all of our safeties were out that we opened camp with including Laundry who was a starter, I don't think I saw Werner out there at all, Freeman and Angerer were both out hurt along with Harvey and McNary. 

 

They were pretty beat up.  Also the starters did alright when they were in there and that's what you want to see.

Werner didnt play. I think only 2 of our draft picks played.

What cracks me up is how serious some people are taking our second and third stringers are playing against theirs. People are freaking out already. If we lose to Oakland their heads will explode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the first preseason game is like a glorified practice

FB/TEs were used much more with Luck and Hasselbeck because we already know they can sling the rock. You saw more multiple WR and spread formations with Harnisch because they want to see what he can do throwing the ball. There is no real gameplan whatsoever. About the only thing to really look at is whether or not an individual player is executing his assignment and beating the man in front of him, and if he isn't, is it a talent problem, or an opportunity to coach?

good to have football back...brings out the 'Chicken Little's' and entertains the rest of us. :)

In that same train of thought. Our d is not reacting to what is in front of them. My favourite part of today is seeing that pat mckafee Is better than every.

Also is dhb injured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Werner didnt play. I think only 2 of our draft picks played.

What cracks me up is how serious some people are taking our second and third stringers are playing against theirs. People are freaking out already. If we lose to Oakland their heads will explode.

image.png

Oh wait it already did that in 2011...hmm...maybe...

6a00d83451b80969e200e55067bb678833-640wi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any chance we take a OT with the 1st pick?
    • FWIW:   Today I listened to a guy from The Athletic interviewed on ESPN.   (Darren Lee). He said interviewing GMs at the combine, almost all view DeJean as a safety except two teams.  He thinks the Colts and Jags view DeJean as a corner.     I don’t know this reporter, never seen him before, so I can’t speak to his credibility.  But it sounds like he did a lot of homework.     And I appreciate your view on pro day times being reliable or not.   I’m always skeptical on pro days.  But I thought DeJean helped himself on his testing.  
    • I could care less what he does. Been too long ago.
    • I’m with ya..     I'm not sure we’re going WR at 15 either.  I think we could go DE, and it’s possible we could go CB as well.   Gosh,  I love Mitchell and really like Arnold as well.  And if we trade back I would be fine with McKinstry or a DE on defense or one of the 2nd tier of WRs that could be there in the 20’s.  So many options.   I keep reminding myself, every pick could produce a surprise, because I think Ballard will have so many options to choose from.      Im also not sure Ballard will use all 7 rounds.   He finished in 5 rounds in his first draft 2017,  and he finished in 6 rounds in 2019.   Maybe he uses all 7 rounds, but I’m not confident we will.     One week from tonight.   
    • My Final Mock Draft   15. Brock Bowers, TE,  6’4 245 Lbs, Georgia - Blue Chip Prospect.  Rare combination of acceleration, speed and body control. Hands-catcher operating with good coordination and technique. With Pittman on the outside Bowers will control the middle of the field and seams. AR Will develop much quicker into a top 10 QB with Bowers as his TE.  46. TJ Tampa, CB, 6’1, 190 Lbs, Iowa State - Elite physical traits. Plays with good positioning throughout routes. Very good in press Coverage and Zone. Expect him to compete in training camp and be named a starter.      82. Calen Bullock, S, 6’2 190 lbs, USC - Elite physical traits. He has the range to play single-high safety, the athleticism to line up over the slot and the ball skills to chalk up impressive on-ball production. Expect him to compete in training camp for the starting S position.    117. Tez Walker,  WR,  6’2 195 Lbs, UNC - Elite speed with very good body control. Career average of 30.7 yards on touchdown receptions. Gives us very good depth and competition with Pierce.    151. Grayson Murphy, DE, 6’3 260 Lbs, UCLA - Shows impressive quickness and change of direction to help turn speed to power as a rusher. Good depth.    191.  Keaton Bills, G, 6’5 320 Lbs, Utah - Cerebral player, quick to react to twists and stunts up front. Very good depth. 
  • Members

    • KB

      KB 1,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,744

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 1,290

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,000

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...