Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Two TE's


Barkman76

Recommended Posts

As I said before this game if we put two TE's in for better blocking along with Gronkowski the FB Painter will have at least a second more each snap to complete the pass!! This couldve produced a win for us. For all you naysayers think before you speak! Add the lbs up! with Tamme and Clark in at the same time we have at least 40 extra lbs of beef to protect Painter. All he needed was a second more to throw bombs to Wayne and Garcon. I saw this and you cannot tell me the 3rd wr can block worth a darn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said before this game if we put two TE's in for better blocking along with Gronkowski the FB Painter will have at least a second more each snap to complete the pass!! This couldve produced a win for us. For all you naysayers think before you speak! Add the lbs up! with Tamme and Clark in at the same time we have at least 40 extra lbs of beef to protect Painter. All he needed was a second more to throw bombs to Wayne and Garcon. I saw this and you cannot tell me the 3rd wr can block worth a darn.

We used plenty of 2TE sets throughout this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys.. 2 TEs means only 3 receivers...

tampa was and would be all over that..

You cant keep both TEs in all the time....not in the NFL

Ummm you can let your qb get hit every other play either. Not saying all the time but half the time would be an imrovement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm you can let your qb get hit every other play either. Not saying all the time but half the time would be an imrovement!

I can't take you seriously. We used 2TE sets plenty in this game. You can't use them all game. You don't need to use them half the game. And the quarterback didn't get hit every other play. The quarterback needs to get rid of the football, regardless of the personnel on the field. 2TE sets doesn't cure all our ills, regardless what you may think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't take you seriously. We used 2TE sets plenty in this game. You can't use them all game. You don't need to use them half the game. And the quarterback didn't get hit every other play. The quarterback needs to get rid of the football, regardless of the personnel on the field. 2TE sets doesn't cure all our ills, regardless what you may think.

Well the more weight on the field the better blocking is what I was hoping could happen and that is a better situation if it can happen more! I dont care if we get 3 220lb wr out there we need more weight for blocking across the board! Right now were stuck with a bunch of fat Albert clones/backups who dont pull their weight. Quit arguing like a woman and try to understand weight matters late in the game. For Example the 260 lb qb beat us on 4th and inches!!! get it ! Let it sink in !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
    • That is a very inaccurate description of what happened.  At this point it’s history and doesn’t need to be revisited but I will say Chloe adds value to this board and should be and is by most encouraged to post, even if people don’t always agree with her.  
    • My response was in regards to another posted suggesting that the Colts need to get the pick right when it comes to picking a WR. I agree with you .
  • Members

    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,180

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 81

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,738

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,482

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,302

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,785

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hawkeyecolt

      Hawkeyecolt 1,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 8,951

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...