Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Are our quarterbacks smart or what?


Recommended Posts

While killing time until tomorrow's game I stumbled upon some interesting stats while surfing the web...If wonderlic scores mean anything it looks like the Colts have some pretty smart quarterbacks.....Luck 37, Harnish, 34 Hasselbeck 29. Compare that if you will to quarterback greats, John Elway 29,Peyton Manning 28, RG3 24, Brett Farve 22, Cam Newton 21, Terry Bradshaw 16, Dan Marino 15, Jim Kelly 15, Donavan MaNabb 15, and Vince Young 6. As you can see,I'm a little bored!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really felt the Wonderlic was all that helpful to determine who will be great players, but it is a good baseline to see who has the aptitude to comprehend the more intellectual aspect of the sport.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really felt the Wonderlic was all that helpful to determine who will be great players, but it is a good baseline to see who has the aptitude to comprehend the more intellectual aspect of the sport.

yea blaine gabber shows you that
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really felt the Wonderlic was all that helpful to determine who will be great players, but it is a good baseline to see who has the aptitude to comprehend the more intellectual aspect of the sport.

Yeah didn't Fitzpatrick score like a perfect 50 or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah didn't Fitzpatrick score like a perfect 50 or something?

 

Yeah, whatever the perfect score is, he got it.  It's just another measurable, like speed, strength or how far you can sling it.  None of those mean you'll be a good or bad QB.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

raw intelligence and wisdom don't necessarily go hand in hand

 

peyton manning is probably the wisest qb i have ever witnessed

In his hey day...hands down.

Tho I would equal Brady but in a much different way.

Both make FEW mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, whatever the perfect score is, he got it.  It's just another measurable, like speed, strength or how far you can sling it.  None of those mean you'll be a good or bad QB.

Hey guys, Your trying to read too much into my post. I simply stated "we have smart quarterbacks!" No more and no less. Let's just smile and go on.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really felt the Wonderlic was all that helpful to determine who will be great players, but it is a good baseline to see who has the aptitude to comprehend the more intellectual aspect of the sport.

Exactly. In my profession there is no applicable college degree out there, however my employer requires a degree, in anything. He says a degree proves you are willing and capable of learning what he wants to teach you. And he has a point.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some players purposely miss questions to avoid getting a perfect score. Having a perfect score is a turn-off for some coaches, because they don't want players over-analyzing things. Read what Pat McInally had to say about his perfect wonderlic:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/28/pat-mcinally-thinks-perfect-wonderlic-score-hurt-his-draft-stoc/

The Wonderlic isn't easy enough that you would have to miss questions on purpose lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Wonderlic doesn't translate to the NFL.  I think Rex Grossman had a higher Wonderlic, but we all know how that turned out.  It's just a little quiz to keep the mental aspect involved in Combine testing.  And I believe the NFL is looking at changing it or using a different test

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Wonderlic isn't easy enough that you would have to miss questions on purpose lol.

The wonderlic is a measure of how quickly a player can think, as all 50 questions must be answered in 12 MINUTES! Given enough time we all could come up with the answers and score high. You have to be preform quickly and accurately to score high. Much more than an IQ test.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderlic is as useless as the SATs

The Wonderlic is actually a really good aptitude test. That's why it's been around so long. However, when it comes to football a high Wonderlic doesn't always translate to a great player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The wonderlic is a measure of how quickly a player can think, as all 50 questions must be answered in 12 MINUTES! Given enough time we all could come up with the answers and score high. You have to be preform quickly and accurately to score high. Much more than an IQ test.

If you gave test takers an unlimited time limit,they would score higher no doubt, but the time limit itself isn't what stops people from getting a perfect score. The questions on the later half of the test get increasingly difficult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you gave test takers an unlimited time limit,they would score higher no doubt, but the time limit itself isn't what stops people from getting a perfect score. The questions on the later half of the test get increasingly difficult.

 

the wonderlic doesnt prove anything though

Link to post
Share on other sites

the wonderlic doesnt prove anything though

Absolutely false.

The Wonderlic is mostly used in business, and in the hiring process. It is used to judge aptitude, and it does a very good job at that. In many work forces having a high Wonderlic score is an extremely good indicator of future job success. There's a reason it's been around since the 1930's, and still hasn't been phased out.

In the NFL however, intelligence/high aptitude is only a fraction of what it takes to be great. The Wonderlic in the NFL is used to see if players can grasp higher concepts, and depending on how you look at it, willingness to learn. It's not meant to predict with 100% accuracy football success or failure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely false.

The Wonderlic is mostly used in business, and in the hiring process. It is used to judge aptitude, and it does a very good job at that. In many work forces having a high Wonderlic score is an extremely good indicator of future job success. There's a reason it's been around since the 1930's, and still hasn't been phased out.

In the NFL however, intelligence/high aptitude is only a fraction of what it takes to be great. The Wonderlic in the NFL is used to see if players can grasp higher concepts, and depending on how you look at it, willingness to learn. It's not meant to predict with 100% accuracy football success or failure.

Standardized tests don't prove anything. I bombed my SATs and finished my college career with a 3.5 gpa as an accounting major

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standardized tests don't prove anything. I bombed my SATs and finished my college career with a 3.5 gpa as an accounting major

Standardized tests absolutely prove things. Take everything I say with a grain of salt and my own opinion, but my background is in psychology and psychological testing. Part of which you learn about many many types of tests, like the SAT, ACT, and tests such as the Wonderlic.

Standardized tests aren't results cast in stone. They don't tell you where you are and always will be, just where you are when you take the test.

I didn't do overly well on my SATs either, but they aren't used to tell colleges how smart you can be, they're used to show colleges where you stand in relation to other perspective students. Then they use that information to decide who is accepted and denied. Now you can argue the merits of that system, but the SAT measures what it claims to measure quite well. As does the Wonderlic.

I can tell you I was not as intelligent as I am now, as I was when I took the SAT, so comparing my collegiate success to back then doesn't apply. Because I've learned since then. When I took the SAT I was a bit of a screw up, and had like a 2.5 GPA lol. So I'm sure my score accurately reflected how much I had actually learned in my time at highschool.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While killing time until tomorrow's game I stumbled upon some interesting stats while surfing the web...If wonderlic scores mean anything it looks like the Colts have some pretty smart quarterbacks.....Luck 37, Harnish, 34 Hasselbeck 29. Compare that if you will to quarterback greats, John Elway 29,Peyton Manning 28, RG3 24, Brett Farve 22, Cam Newton 21, Terry Bradshaw 16, Dan Marino 15, Jim Kelly 15, Donavan MaNabb 15, and Vince Young 6. As you can see,I'm a little bored!

What was Mark Sanchez' score?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standardized tests absolutely prove things. Take everything I say with a grain of salt and my own opinion, but my background is in psychology and psychological testing. Part of which you learn about many many types of tests, like the SAT, ACT, and tests such as the Wonderlic.

Standardized tests aren't results cast in stone. They don't tell you where you are and always will be, just where you are when you take the test.

I didn't do overly well on my SATs either, but they aren't used to tell colleges how smart you can be, they're used to show colleges where you stand in relation to other perspective students. Then they use that information to decide who is accepted and denied. Now you can argue the merits of that system, but the SAT measures what it claims to measure quite well. As does the Wonderlic.

I can tell you I was not as intelligent as I am now, as I was when I took the SAT, so comparing my collegiate success to back then doesn't apply. Because I've learned since then. When I took the SAT I was a bit of a screw up, and had like a 2.5 GPA lol. So I'm sure my score accurately reflected how much I had actually learned in my time at highschool.

 

I was looking into graduate school a while ago in business and I had an admissions person tell me that the GMAT is the most reliable indicator of success in graduate school, more so then undergraduate GPA.

 

But you are right standardized tests can only tell you so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking into graduate school a while ago in business and I had an admissions person tell me that the GMAT is the most reliable indicator of success in graduate school, more so then undergraduate GPA.

But you are right standardized tests can only tell you so much.

Oh yeah, the tests they want from you for graduate school are definitely the next level, and also much more specific about what they feel you should know. Like the LSAT, GRE, MCAT, much more narrow testing than a test like the SAT which is testing very broad concepts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pundits as far as my recollection has always referred to the media folks.....wow, a lot of folks in an uproar over nothing!   And I have a job as well......   Something more meaningful to complain about? I was poking fun. But since you brought it up......how about this new Equality Act? What is your stance on biologically born men transitioning to women (sorta) and competing in women's sports programs? Is that meaningful enough for you? Or how about the new Stimulus Bill that gives roughly 9% of it's money (out of 1.9 Trillion) to actual COVID related concerns? Not counting Federal Employees being EXTRA EXTRA stimulated if they have the 'unfortunate circumstance' of having to stay at home with their children whilst the rest of American "civilian" families lose jobs, get furloughed, laid off, quit/fired or whatever form of no longer working you want to call it.....Is that meaningful enough? Never mind......wrong forum....   By the way, I clearly said "Pundits" in both the title and the body of the OP and asked if anyone has heard or seen some other funny ones????? Media - it was clearly stated in the Title and in the body of the OP......
    • Yup. This was a good exercise to get folks thinking. I think the best time to do a board mock is a few weeks before the draft, after a lot of the FA dominos has tumbled. I almost did a flash mock last year the week before draft. Short clock, and perhaps scheduled windows
    • The "pundit" wrote his statement as if Rhodes were still on the team and not a street free agent. I was not saying we are set, we have talent. However, the premise was that the national pundit didn't even know Rhodes is a street free agent! National mocks, of course!
    • Manning and Brady, or I should say QB in general, is not a good comp. QB is a singular position which the entire O goes through, and is typically the face/leader of the team, and plays every snap. And then add on top of that PM and TB are 2 of the greatest ever and were able to play every game, all game.. And plugging them in to a team is very different than plugging in a guy who would be one of 4 on the DL, and likely playing only around 60% of snaps.    Like I said, love to have him on a reasonable deal. I just don't see him being generous enough to make it work. I'd recommend looking at our ammo (2 early draft picks, 42ish M in cap), and solving for the holes we need to fill (2xDE, LT, WR1 and 4, CB1 and 4, MIKE, TE).    I really do think most of the team will be put back together from last year. Rhodes will get a good raise, Autry and/or Houston likely, or at minimum one (similar $ to last year). TY is really the only one I don't envision being back. Perhaps Walker moves on too, but we'll need to fill that hole as Oke doesn't look to be the 3 down answer. Anyways, lot of high dollar holes, with decent, not great ammo. I'm hoping they go DE in the 1st, LT in the second. Back to the question above, how would you allocate the draft picks and $, while filling all the holes, and making it work with Watt.
  • Members

    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 9,207

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Maxwell2

      Maxwell2 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 629

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 2,486

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JFreeman

      JFreeman 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franchise

      Franchise 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 9

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher2

      LJpalmbeacher2 1,790

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 212

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • luv_pony_express

      luv_pony_express 622

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...