Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2012 Draft Order


Recommended Posts

The following is speculation on the 2012 draft order as it would exist now based on the NFL Power Poll. I realize that is about as accurate as a pea shooter at 500 yards in a swirling wind, but it is the best we have right now. It is taken directly from WalterFootball.com. I have added my comments as to whether or not teams would be interested in trading up to get the #1 pick to draft Luck. It is only focused on Luck, not some other player a team might think they need to have the #1 pick to get.

1. Seattle (1-2) - they have the pick in this case and would keep it to draft Luck.

2. Indianapolis (0-3) - would not trade up, but would trade down to acquire more picks.

3. Kansas City (0-3)- I think they would trade up.

4. Jacksonville (1-2) - would not (Picked up Gabbert in 2011)

5. Miami (0-3)- would trade up

6. Cleveland (2-1) - would not trade up

7 Cincinnati (1-2) - possibly would trade up

8. Arizona (1-2) - would not

9. Denver (1-2) - possible would

10. St. Louis (0-3)- would not

11. Minnesota (0-3) - possibly would

12. Tennessee (2-1)- would not

13. Carolina (1-2) - would not

14. Washington (2-1) - possibly would

15. Houston (2-1) - would not

16. Cleveland - from Atlanta (1-2) - would not

17. Chicago (1-2)- possibly would

18. Dallas (2-1)- possibly would

19. Oakland (2-1)- Al Davis would do anything so I refuse to speculate

20. Philadelphia (1-2) - Depends on Vicks health.

21. San Francisco* (2-1) - In a heartbeat since Harbaugh coached him.

22. San Diego* (2-1) - would not

23. Buffalo* (3-0) - would not

24. New York Giants* (2-1) - would not

25. Tampa Bay* (2-1) - would not

26. Detroit* (3-0) - would not

27. New York Jets* (2-1) - would not

28. Pittsburgh* (2-1) - would not

29. Baltimore* (2-1) - would not

30. New England - from New Orleans* (2-1)- would not

31. New England* (2-1) - would not

32 Green Bay* (3-0) - would not

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL on Al Davis...

The Top 10 looks very plausible....but anyone after the 3rd overall pick is going to have to pay HUGE compensation for the 1st overall if Luck continues to have a nice season.

The NFL trade value chart is a baseline for trading these picks...nut the 1st overall this year will probably have extra value.

http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved the Al Davis comment. lol

the only team I disagree with is Buffalo. I do think they would give strong consideration to moving up. Fitzpatrick has been in the league a while now. He had a decent year last year but nothing flashy. He is off to a good start this year but I think this is his make or break year. If he keeps playing like he has the first 3 games then he could be safe, but if he begins to stumble and doesn't finish as strongly as he started then I think they would definitely consider moving up. So basically, I would consider them one of the "possibly would" teams. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL on Al Davis...

The Top 10 looks very plausible....but anyone after the 3rd overall pick is going to have to pay HUGE compensation for the 1st overall if Luck continues to have a nice season.

The NFL trade value chart is a baseline for trading these picks...nut the 1st overall this year will probably have extra value.

http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php

Good link.

Let's play out a scenario where the Colts end up with the #1 pick in the 2012 draft. It is worth 3,000 points.

Minnesota needs a QB and is around number 11 and wants to work a trade. I am not going after players in the trade, so they give us their first round pick in this year's draft - worth 1,250. They still owe us 1,750 so we get their second round pick in the 2012 draft - worth 470 points which means they still owe us 1,280 points. The chart does not say what a pick in the 2013 draft is worth, so let's assign it a value of 1,000 points (it is probably worth less). They give us their 2013 first round pick and a third round as well. This would leave us a little short in points, but would give us an additional second round pick in 2012, two first round picks and an additional third round pick in 2013. We could really build a major base for the end of Manning's career and the beginning of his replacement's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good link.

Let's play out a scenario where the Colts end up with the #1 pick in the 2012 draft. It is worth 3,000 points.

Minnesota needs a QB and is around number 11 and wants to work a trade. I am not going after players in the trade, so they give us their first round pick in this year's draft - worth 1,250. They still owe us 1,750 so we get their second round pick in the 2012 draft - worth 470 points which means they still owe us 1,280 points. The chart does not say what a pick in the 2013 draft is worth, so let's assign it a value of 1,000 points (it is probably worth less). They give us their 2013 first round pick and a third round as well. This would leave us a little short in points, but would give us an additional second round pick in 2012, two first round picks and an additional third round pick in 2013. We could really build a major base for the end of Manning's career and the beginning of his replacement's.

Minnesota drafted Christian Ponder last year...something someone had to remind me of because I'd forgotten all about it. lol that said though I don't think the Vikes would make a huge move since they already took Ponder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minnesota drafted Christian Ponder last year...something someone had to remind me of because I'd forgotten all about it. lol that said though I don't think the Vikes would make a huge move since they already took Ponder.

Forgot that too. When you get to be my age, you have trouble with what happened this morning let alone what went on last April.

Let's look at Denver. We have 100 points less to work with, but I believe we can still make the trade and end up in just about the same place.

I don't believe that Fox really has plans for Tebow and neither do I.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot that too. When you get to be my age, you have trouble with what happened this morning let alone what went on last April.

Let's look at Denver. We have 100 points less to work with, but I believe we can still make the trade and end up in just about the same place.

I don't believe that Fox really has plans for Tebow and neither do I.

Hey don't feel bad...like I said, I'd forgotten all about Ponder too. It was in another thread where I basically was working on a similar list of potential trade partners and I included Minn as well. Someone else reminded me that they drafted Ponder. lol

Honestly, if we wind up with the #1 pick, I would try to make at least 2 trade downs. I think there will be a team in the top 5 who is so in love with Luck that they'll move up to take him as opposed to taking their chance on getting Landry Jones (very likely the #2 QB off the board) or whoever winds up the #3 ranked QB. I would move down to that spot in exchange for a minimum of their second round in 2012, first round in 2013 and whatever else we can squeeze from them.

Then I would take that #2-5 pick and trade down one more time to around 8-12. There are at least 5-10 highly projected impact players that teams, imo, will be willing to move up for. These include but are not limited to Quinton Coples, Alshon Jeffrey, Justin Blackmon (though I disagree), Donta Paige-Moss (maybe..personally haven't been very impressed with him), Vontaze Burfict, Matt Kalil etc. The one player who I would consider forgoing the second trade for would be Dre Kirkpatrick, but there will be some very talented lock down CB's in the later 1st round and 2nd round....Kirkpatrick just happens to be the best of the bunch. If we were to be able to make those deals, we would likely wind up with at least 2-3 picks in the second, third and or fourth rounds and there should be a lot of very solid talent in those rounds. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was thinking a bit about what Ballard said in that clip from "Behind the Colts", about "he's not going to get much bigger". No idea if he was talking about Worthy... but if he is... he's right. Whether Worthy ends up playing at 165 or 176... this is still extremely small and light. Whether he's in the 1st percentile or 5th percentile of athlete's in weight in the league, this doesn't change the type of player and type of worries you would have about him with any significance. So... in a way, I kind of find that conversation a bit pointless. IMO the question should be - okay. he is small... and he will always be small. Can we work with that? 
    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
    • I was too hahaha  Why’s that
    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
  • Members

    • Moe

      Moe 589

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,241

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 1,041

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...