Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts 2013 Schedule [Merge]

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think 12-4 is a possibility this year.. But I'd say we will be a 10 or 11 win team.



Still a team with some holes and not sure how all our signings will come together on D(hopefully great). Also won a ton of close games last year, may not have them all go in our favor again this year

Link to post
Share on other sites

If our defense doesn't play better then last season, we could very well be 4-3 by our bye week. then after the bye week the Texans and Bengals should be the only remaining tough games we have left. key word being " SHOULD BE " ..... who knows what will happened with those other teams, AZ, or KC could become playoff contenders with their new QB's lol.  they both were really only missing a decent QB anyway and KC gave us a fit last season with who ever it was they had at QB lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stretch of Chargers on the road for MNF, followed by Broncos at SNF followed by at the Texans on the road for SNF is going to be the brutal part.


In other words, our primetime stretch that we yearned for could decide if we can compete for the division or not, IMO. Can't go winless during that 3 game span.


I expect 2 divisional losses (Texans, Titans), and 3 non-divisional losses (Chargers, Broncos, Bengals, 49ers). 


10-6 with 7-1 at home and 3-5 on the road.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pats haven't been the best for almost a decade....

They have been of the best and won their division multiple times over the past decade.

Hence, if you can beat them you are in in good company.


Yeah, not playing them makes our schedule a little easier,

but playing the tough teams make you better come playoff time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it. Harder games first. Easier second half.


Personally, I'd rather have it spaced out well. Can't go into the playoffs playing average teams in December, hard to be battle tested in close games. Broncos proved that last year, IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good looking schedule from what I can tell !!!  I can see us easily going 11-5 again for maybe 12-4.  


Did anyone notice on the NFL network they had us losing BOTH games to the Texans?  LOL.  Don't they know the Texans have never won in Indy?  I see us splitting games again with the Texans, or possibly even winning both times against them.


Can't wait for the season to begin.  GOOOOOOO Colts !!!!!!!!!!!  :coltslogo:     :shoe:  :shoe:  :shoe:    :lombardi:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul Kuharsky does his breakdowns of the Colts schedule like he did for the rest of the afc south teams:

Breakdown: The Colts look to have a favorable start and finish to their 2013 slate. They open against Oakland, against Miami, at San Francisco and at Jacksonville. We know teams can make major jumps in one season, just as the Colts did last year. But our reference point is last season. And while the 49ers are the defending NFC champions, the other three teams combined for 13 wins in 2012 and certainly appear beatable.

Indianapolis’ final two games are at Kansas City and against Jacksonville. A road trip to Arrowhead Stadium in the dead of winter is never easy, and the Chiefs are likely to be far better at the end of their first season under Andy Reid than at the start. Still, they were the worst team in the league in 2012. The Jaguars were the other two-win team. The top two picks in the draft, providing neither team trades back, will be at the end of their initial seasons. They could be worn down or they could have found a rhythm.

Complaint department: The Colts get an unfair deal in advance of what may qualify as the NFL’s regular-season game of the year. Sunday night football On Oct. 20 should be a huge ratings game as Peyton Manning returns to Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis with the Denver Broncos.

Indy will be recovering from a West Coast road trip on a short week for "Monday Night Football" at San Diego. The Broncos, meanwhile, will be coming off a home game against Jacksonville. It’s not exactly an even Week 6, but these sorts of things happen and the Colts will have to be ready even if they won’t be as well rested as the Broncos.

Favorable division rematches: The Colts’ second games against each of their AFC South opponents come in the final five weeks of the season and are all at home. Indianapolis hosts the Titans in Week 13, the Texans in Week 15 and the Jaguars in Week 17. That Texans game could be crucial for deciding the division crown and the Colts have a huge advantage. Houston has lost all 11 times it’s played in Indianapolis.

In all, five of Indianapolis’ last nine games are against AFC South teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Colts get off to a good start and come out of October without being dead they are going to be in prime position to make a run not only for the South but for Home filed in the AFC. 


I'll take our schedule over the Texans that's for sure.  Three of their last four are on the road and their loan home game in there is with the Broncos.  They also have to come to Indy during that stretch.  Their last game before the stretch starts is also a home game with the Pats.  So they could very well be playing three playoff teams in their last five games.  The other two games are road games against Division foes meaning they play all three Division foes on the road in the last month of the season.  That's brutal when you factor in the only two other games over that run are New England and Denver. 


Then there is a team like the Bengals who don't have a bye week till Week 12 and have to close at the Chargers, vs us, at the Steelers, vs. the Vikings and vs. the Ravens.  That's three playoff teams from a year ago and maybe two teams in the playoff hunt this year in the Chargers and Steelers. 


All and all I think we got a pretty favorable schedule if we survive October.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raiders - W - 1-0 This should be a good start to the season. Colts win this game relatively easily and send an early message to the league. 24-10

Dolphins - W - 2-0: I feel that this game will be a little closer then some expect but Luck works his magic at home. 27-17

@Niners - L - 2-1: This game will go a long way to determining how good this team will be this year. They manage to win this game and go to 3-0, they make a big jump into the discussion of being elite. However, I feel the Colts lose this one as a Luck come back falls short late. 31-27

Jags - W - 3-1: Indy rebounds at home and takes care of business against their division rival. Both sides of the ball play well. 27-6

Seahawks - W - 4-1: Russel Wilson and Andrew Luck square off in the battle of two 2nd year QBs. Indy holds onto a late lead and wins. 27-21

@Chargers - W - 5-1: The Colts in their first primetime matchup of the year put on a good display. Luck tosses 2 TDs and a Philip Rivers INT seals a Solid Colts win. 24-13

Broncos - W 6-1: The game of the year lives up to the hype. Both Andrew Luck and Peyton Manning lead their teams to score after score. Luck and co. deliever the final blow on a late AV FG. 34-31

BYE - 6-1

@Texans - L 6-2: Coming out of the bye, the Colts defense plays surprisingly well but the Colts offense doesn't start clicking till late in the game. A frustrated AL throws 3 INTs and the Colts fall. 27-13

Rams - W - 7-2 Andrew Luck and the Colts offense start to find their groove again on offense. Sam Bradford tosses a couple of TDs to keep the game interesting but Indys offesnse proved to be too much. 28-17

@Titans - W - 8-2: The Colts take on Matt Hasslebecks former team in a TNF matchup. Luck runs for a score and tosses another in a relatively boring game. Colts win. 17-6

@Cardinals - L - 8-3: This is the game the Colts should of win. An aging Carson Palmer tosses 3 TDs. Indys offense matches score for score early but a late stop has Arizona hold on to win. 30-

Titans -W 9-3The Colts rebound the next week and finish their sweep of the titans. 23-10

@Bengals - W 10-3: AL and company play a frigid low scoring game in cincii. AV still has the leg and kicks a 42 trader to win. 13-10

Texans - W - 11-3: The Texans winless streak at LOS continues as the Colts click on all cylinders. 28-13

@Chiefs - W - 12-3: Game plays similar to how last years was with a late td saving the day. 14-6

Jags - W - 13-3: Indy closes out a division title and sweeps the Jags. 26-13

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
  • Members

  • Create New...