Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Don Banks of Sports Illustrated Has The Colts Taking...


Recommended Posts

24

D.J. Fluker

OT Alabama

Sr.6-5339

We had to stop Fluker's slide, because he's too good a prospect to slip any further down the board (sorry, No. 26 Green Bay). The Colts have other more pressing needs on defense, but even with free agent right offensive tackle Gosder Cherilus signed this offseason, Indy general manager Ryan Grigson doesn't seem like the type to pass on this level of quality at this value. And perhaps Fluker's presence can be used to get the best out of underachieving left tackle Anthony Castonzo.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130417/2013-nfl-mock-draft-6/?sct=uk_t11_a7

How would this work for us if he turns out to be correct? Would Fluker or Castonzo move to guard or would one win out over the other? Interesting proposition none the less...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Castonzo was the only bright spot on our line last year. I think he's the last of our worries on O-line right now and I wouldn't want to move him inside just because we drafted an unproven rookie. Let's see how Castonzo plays alongside a quality gaurd first, before we think he's underperformed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He would play Guard.

 

why take a tackle and make him play guard. its two different positions. if cooper and warmack are gone then trade down and take warford

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fluker is being considered a guard right away, and later a tackle prospect. At least by some. He's NOT a left tackle prospect, he'd be solely a right tackle. If we took Fluker, I would expect him to compete at right guard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why take a tackle and make him play guard. its two different positions. if cooper and warmack are gone then trade down and take warford

Because that's what happens to massive tackles with slow feet

On another note, there is no way Fluker could play LT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plug him at starting guard an backup RT for Cherilus. He possesses all the traits you want out of a guard.

Personally I wouldn't be against none of these picks at 24: Warmack Cooper of course, Jarvis Jones, Fluker, Teo, Datone Jones, Rhodes, Hayden, Trufant, Damontre Moore, Cyprien, Bjoern Werner, Codarrelle Patterson, Hopkins,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fluker is being considered a guard right away, and later a tackle prospect. At least by some. He's NOT a left tackle prospect, he'd be solely a right tackle. If we took Fluker, I would expect him to compete at right guard.

^This^ They were interviewing Fluker on Sirius NFL earlier today and he was asked who he had met with and whether the teams he had talked to had said anything to him about moving inside to guard. Fluker said most all the teams he had met with had talked to him about the possibility of playing guard; and that he was perfectly fine with making the move. The hosts (can't remember which show) made comments of agreement about how they felt he would be best at guard and most likely be played there by whoever drafted him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fluker is my fondest hope for this draft.  I would want him to start at RG, of course.  However, I'm really doubting he's going to last to our pick.  With how the Andre Smith thing hasn't resolved itself, Cincy will pick him @ #21 if Smith doesn't sign a one-year contract or something the day before the draft.  The Giants also sound likely to take him if he's there...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Because I’ve been a Colts fan for a long time and Jim Irsay has never had an issue spending money.  Ballard has also said over and over again he was saving his money to pay his own.  This isn’t breaking news.  So rather buy into some idea that he was fine with spending money under Tobin, Polian, and Grigson but is no longer fine with spending money under Ballard just doesn’t add up when you look at his history and what Ballard said.  It’s much more logical to assume that’s he’s spending what Ballard wants like he has with his previous GMs especially when the GM tells you he doesn’t believe in splash free agents and is saving his money to sign his own.   Irsay doesn’t negotiate the contracts.  Ballard does so contract structuring is done by Ballard and Ballard has done it in away to give him cap flexibility that is going to allow him to keep guys like Nelson, Leonard, Smith and others over the next couple of years.    Also Jim Irsay is worth 3 billion dollars he’s not hurting for money.   You want to see an organization that doesn’t want to spend money look across town where Simon won’t even let the Pacers look at the luxury tax.  That’s an owner who doesn’t want to spend.
    • I’m not sure why you find it hard to accept that the Colts may have cash flow problems?  Not that they can’t manage them, but still….   Irsay is one of the few owners who doesn’t have any other source of big income.   No high tech company.  No real estate development.   No oil and gas.   His wealth is owning the Colts.   That’s it.    Sure he may he may spend money, but these last five years he now uses a pay-go system that lends itself to managing money.  We used to give bigger SB’s under Grigson.   Now,  we give either small or no signing bonuses.   Very few teams do that.  And we’re a very small market franchise.   You weren’t the least bit surprised to see DeForest Buckner accept a ZERO signing bonus?   I sure was.     Point of clarification:  none of what I’ve written is proof of anything.   But I think it’s at least worth considering, and you seem completely unwilling to even do that.  I confess find that surprising. 
    • Just because they had money left over doesn’t mean Irsay had a problem spending it had Ballard wanted too.  It doesn’t take that hard of a look back at Irsay’s history of owner to see he has zero problem spending what his GM wants to spend.  
    • That's not exactly true if you consider cap space left over. IIRC, we had the most unspent or near most unspent over a 3-4 year period just recently (IIRC, 16, 17, 18, 19). Pretty sure we had 40+M unspent two years in a row.   IIRC, we carried over the most in the league again this year at around 30M.   It was also speculated that we 1) didn't ask Luck for money back, AND 2) gave JB such a big raise, was because we would have been too far under the 89% rule had we not done both 1 and 2.     
    • Regardless Irsay has never been shy about spending to make the Colts better.  So either way the first point that started all this is irrelevant.  
  • Members

    • RDNScot

      RDNScot 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kangaroo

      Kangaroo 98

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 338

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 429

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 10,014

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 831

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...