Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

theanarchist

"lots of lines in the water"

Recommended Posts

hey.. they're getting every SCRUB in the table.. they're getting the fishes just the smaller one that fit in their pockets...

ha, they are scrubs in your eyes because you don't know who they were at first, neither if the O-linemen we signed were scrubs, and Greg Toler is certainly no scrub, in fact all three of those guys will have good years here next year just wait, the only questionable one really is Erik Welden, but just look at Tim Jennings, let them play before insulting them smh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey.. they're getting every SCRUB in the table.. they're getting the fishes just the smaller one that fit in their pockets...

 

You don't know anything. Grigson > you at being GM and at life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when did people start personally attacking each other on here? I think its time for some of you to log off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not criticizing mind you. I just think this is going a LOT different than we expected. Doesn't help when Jim tweets teasers and gets all of us worked up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's OK.. i don't take it seriously.. I'm just still mad because of losing Vasquez and just getting impacient now.. we don't have the picks we had last year.. and of the 11 wins.. we had 3 or 4 "LUCKy" ones.. Hard to repeat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's OK.. i don't take it seriously.. I'm just still mad because of losing Vasquez and just getting impacient now.. we don't have the picks we had last year.. and of the 11 wins.. we had 3 or 4 "LUCKy" ones.. Hard to repeat

I hear you there. Lots of areas need help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not criticizing mind you. I just think this is going a LOT different than we expected. Doesn't help when Jim tweets teasers and gets all of us worked up

When Jim teased us back in the fall we got Vontae Davis. By the weekend I think we bring in some really good talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When Jim teased us back in the fall we got Vontae Davis. By the weekend I think we bring in some really good talent.

Hope you are right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's OK.. i don't take it seriously.. I'm just still mad because of losing Vasquez and just getting impacient now.. we don't have the picks we had last year.. and of the 11 wins.. we had 3 or 4 "LUCKy" ones.. Hard to repeat

Can anyone please show me where the Colts "lost" Vasquez? I know there were writers spreading rumors that the Colts were looking at him, and a million threads here, but can anyone provide a quote from JI, Grigs or Pags?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone please show me where the Colts "lost" Vasquez? I know there were writers spreading rumors that the Colts were looking at him, and a million threads here, but can anyone provide a quote from JI, Grigs or Pags?

 

No joke, not to mention Vasquez went to Denver of all places, if you are a line man & you have John Elway whooing you about protecting and making a SB run with 18, not really hard to see why hes a Bronco now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone please show me where the Colts "lost" Vasquez? I know there were writers spreading rumors that the Colts were looking at him, and a million threads here, but can anyone provide a quote from JI, Grigs or Pags?

^^ Exactly! Every one just assumes we "lost" him .... why does no one consider the possibility we got who we wanted, and Vasquez was not our first choice?  Just because the majority of the board anointed Vasquez as the best option for us at guard does not mean the Colts had him rated as such.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we looking in FA for a veteran Outside  receiver and a decent back up QB  whats the latest on that ?      i wouldn't mind  cassel as backup  and as wide receiver   kevin walter ? or moss he'd be cheap

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we looking in FA for a veteran Outside  receiver and a decent back up QB  whats the latest on that ?      i wouldn't mind  cassel as backup  and as wide receiver   kevin walter ? or moss he'd be cheap

I don't think we're done for sure. DL, WR, I doubt QB. We can pick up a backup if they want one for cheap or grab late in the draft or UDFA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts had no chance with Vasquez once John Elway gave his agent a call.  The man wanted to play for a Super Bowl, that they are the biggest most obvious contenders that where in the market for a guard.  

 

He could have easily gotten more money then he did.  He gave them a "I want to play for a SB" discount.  

 

That's what happened.  And while we are good and I think we are improving. . . we are still pretty far behind Denver.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts had no chance with Vasquez once John Elway gave his agent a call.  The man wanted to play for a Super Bowl, that they are the biggest most obvious contenders that where in the market for a guard.  

 

He could have easily gotten more money then he did.  He gave them a "I want to play for a SB" discount.  

 

That's what happened.  And while we are good and I think we are improving. . . we are still pretty far behind Denver.   

 

We could have gotten Vasquez if we wanted him.

 

We are behind Denver ... but they have to win now, because they only have about a 2 year window before they are no longer contenders and shopping for a QB. Which will be just about the time we are back to being one of the dominant contenders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could have gotten Vasquez if we wanted him.

 

We are behind Denver ... but they have to win now, because they only have about a 2 year window before they are no longer contenders and shopping for a QB. Which will be just about the time we are back to being one of the dominant contenders.

 

I don't think so, the guy took way too big of a discount to say that we could have gotten him without way overspending for him.  Vasquez could have gotten 7 or 8 million easily.  He took 5.8 million.  

 

Denver isn't going to be shopping for a QB as much as you might think.  The year they signed Peyton they also drafted Brock Osweiler in the 2nd round.  He's Peyton's backup now and is likely their QB of the future.  It's hard to gauge how good he really is though because he's only thrown 4 passes in garbage time.  On those passes he was 2 - 4 for 12 yards.  

 

But that having been said, I agree that they are only major contenders while Peyton is still there.  But they do have his replacement in the wings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could have gotten Vasquez if we wanted him.

 

We are behind Denver ... but they have to win now, because they only have about a 2 year window before they are no longer contenders and shopping for a QB. Which will be just about the time we are back to being one of the dominant contenders.

 

I agree with Valpo.  I think Vasquez chose Denver to play for the best team.  I definitely think he could have gotten more money.  Plus take into account that he signed a 4 year contract and, if I'm not mistaken, there are 4 years remaining on Peyton's contract.  Could be coincidence...or not.

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Valpo.  I think Vasquez chose Denver to play for the best team.  I definitely think he could have gotten more money.  Plus take into account that he signed a 4 year contract and, if I'm not mistaken, there are 4 years remaining on Peyton's contract.  Could be coincidence...or not.

 

:)

 

Peyton signed a 3 yr deal. so he has 2 years left.    :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peyton signed a 3 yr deal. so he has 2 years left. :)

Yeah, Denver is in serious win now mode. They honestly don't have much of a future at QB after Peyton.

The Colts on the other hand are playing with house money. I love it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peyton signed a 3 yr deal. so he has 2 years left.    :)

 

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-03-20/peyton-manning-broncos-tim-tebow-john-elway-2012-nfl-free-agents

 

 

Peyton Manning agreed to a five-year contract worth a reported $96 million with the Denver Broncos on Tuesday.

 

 

 

 

Now don't get me wrong, I know that contracts can be changed, restructured, voided with correct terms, etc etc...just saying the actual contract was for 5 years. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He will never replace Luck for me, but he's slowly growing on me. The guy has talent. You can't deny him that.
    • Colts.com has Nelson wearing the blue pants with blue out being the theme for Sunday. Possible blue pants vs the broncos?
    • I'm guessing you didn't watch the game live? lol.
    • I gotta agree. Those trades smell of desperation...and unwashed jocks.
    • I've been optimistic about JB since we lost our starter (Rest his soul) . But every Sunday (because hes unproven) I get nervous about JB and lose faith. So far, hes done a very good job. Doing just enough to keep us in games.    Playing vs Houston and seeing how well he did (late game the whole team went prevent so not too worried there), gave me a lot more confidence. But it's hard to trust a guy who has to earn it in front of literally everyone in the league.    I'll tell you what I do like however.  Because Brissett doesn't have this mega obvious talent as a QB, they arent throwing the ball constantly. It's like because you have a franchise QB, you feel this need to throw the ball, even in situations you shouldn't. You rarely establish a ground game, and when you do, it is only in compliment to the pass.    The Colts keep winning in different ways. They are multifaceted. So they CAN and DO play to their opponents weaknesses, and and have the ability to play almost any kind of offense (from what we have seen so far)..   with a top 5-7 QB, you just pass more. Vs KC, we would have passed more with any of the top 5 QBs in the NFL. But we didnt. Because we didnt have a top 5 QB to blur our vision from their weakness and our strength.. I think Frank experiencing this is great for our future. If JB becomes a top 10 QB (in most stats), this could mean heaps in the sense of valuing this team as a whole. Instead of everything being built around the QB, the team is built around the lines and go out.     Something I was thinking about earlier with Brady. It is my opinion that he is a system QB. He is the best system QB of all time. But hes in the perfect system for his strengths to flourish. Sometimes it's just better to have the right system QB. Maybe JB is the perfect system QB for our system. Just a thought guys.    We need to remember our addiction to winning as fans indeed blurs our own vision from seeing the true reality of things. 
  • Members

    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 444

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 8,974

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 108

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark_Superman

      Dark_Superman 3,683

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gyworks

      Gyworks 130

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsAC

      ColtsAC 146

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 5,689

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan_canada

      coltsfan_canada 57

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • kornstar

      kornstar 172

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Caffrey

      Caffrey 79

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...