Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

It's possible the Colts could lose Stanton to.....


Recommended Posts

Stanton is a lifetime, NFL backup. While i agree that he's better than corn-on-the-kolb, he doesn't have any NFL film or highlights showcasing his potential to be a starter in this league. Watch what happens with Chandler Harnish. I like this guys skill set, and i think he's gonna end up in a situation similiar to Matt Flynn, except he's actually gonna start for some team.

Stanton is a lifetime, NFL backup. While i agree that he's better than corn-on-the-kolb, he doesn't have any NFL film or highlights showcasing his potential to be a starter in this league. Watch what happens with Chandler Harnish. I like this guys skill set, and i think he's gonna end up in a situation similiar to Matt Flynn, except he's actually gonna start for some team.

I agree, I'm not saying he's the next Tom Brady (sorry to reference that name in this forum) but I think if a team ever gives him a chance to play he could definitely be a starter somewhere. I'm glad we have him as our back up just in case, but I do feel kind of bad for him as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

..... Arizona.     A story on NFL.com saying Stanton might have a better shot at more playing time in Arizona than Indianapolis.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000137697/article/drew-stanton-could-join-bruce-arians-with-cardinals

 

Colts trade Stanton and 1st round pick for Arizona's 2nd, 3rd, 4th... Arizona would then have 2 1st rounders + Stanton not a bad trade...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts trade Stanton and 1st round pick for Arizona's 2nd, 3rd, 4th... Arizona would then have 2 1st rounders + Stanton not a bad trade...

 

Except that we can't trade Stanton.    He had a 1-year deal with the Colts.   He's now a FA.

 

Otherwise,  that's an interesting deal,  though I doubt Arizona would give up that much....  

 

If only we could......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Except that we can't trade Stanton.    He had a 1-year deal with the Colts.   He's now a FA.

 

Otherwise,  that's an interesting deal,  though I doubt Arizona would give up that much....  

 

If only we could......

Just read Bleacher Reports "Valentines Day" Mock... 

Colts get: Wait for it...

1RD Jarvis Jones

3RD Robert Woods

4th Joe Kruger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read Bleacher Reports "Valentines Day" Mock... 

Colts get: Wait for it...

1RD Jarvis Jones

3RD Robert Woods

4th Joe Kruger

 

There's a reason why Bleacher Report has the well earned reputation that it has (awful!!)...  and it's projections like that.

 

The only way Jarvis falls to 24 is if the medical reports from the combine scare the Hell out of the rest of the NFL, but somehow the Colts doctors say....  "sure!"...    and Woods falling to the bottom of the 3rd round is a pipe dream as well. 

 

Kruger is Paul Kruger's kid brother?   Big DL at Utah?    I'd be OK if we can snatch him up.

 

But the 1st/3rd picks for the Colts are crazy bad (in an unrealistic way, though they are great players...)

 

Thanks for posting it False Start...   I needed the good laugh.      :thmup:

 

p.s. -- please don't take my post as a shot to you.   It's not.   I'm just not a fan of BR, and that's why I thought you were sharing it, to get the laugh....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think that Coach Bruce is going to begin his head coaching career with a backup QB, do you?

 

There aren't a whole lot of great options out there for him to choose from. If I were him, I'd be staying with Kolb, and that's not a very encouraging prospect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If they're looking at the absolute "must re-sign" players coming up ( Leonard, Smith, Q), and also want to make a splash in FA, I can see a restructure for a player they expect to be here for a while, such as Kelly. The cap room could get awfully small in a hurry under the above scenario. A little breathing room is a good thing.   
    • No...but I would have done that move for the two QBs drafted after him. We would just have to assume that Ballard is not Ryan Pace and that he wouldn't draft Tribuskaye.   But of course it's a gamble. Addressing QB is a challenge nearly all teams must face. And it's what separates teams. That's what made KC a perennial playoff team that would lose on WC weekend into the #1 team in the NFL. Or takes a perennial 8-8 team like BUF and makes them into a team that can compete with a team like KC.    Trading (with conditions) for a QB coming off a terrible season is a gamble as well. It's just less of a gamble because Reich knows Wentz and because of a perceived lower cost...and because they can bail pretty quickly. Which is exactly why it's a half-measure. They know they aren't committing to Wentz any further than the first 75% of next season. I can understand the appeal of that...but with a position like QB...I am not convinced it will get them where they want to go.   But we will just have to see it play out.        
    • I wouldn't trade Leonard or Nelson for TWO Godwins. 
    • Even if Brady was a first rounder,   the bucs didn't spend a first on him.   He was a free agent.   Manning went to 2 super bowls in denver.
    • Wentz is the first real dart throw...but it's still somewhat of a half-measure. And this has really been the theme since Luck got retired.   First, they tried to turn the backup QB into a franchise QB by giving him money and trying to speak it into existence.   Second, they signed a very old vet QB with a very good track record that had experience with Reich to a low-risk one-year deal to make a push.   Third, they finally traded some real draft capital for a younger post-hype QB (already under contract) who had fallen out of favor with his former team. But they even hedged this move by making one of those picks conditional...because even they know this move is a risky move that they aren't 100% confident in.   But it's not surprising...because these moves sort of follow a theme or a philosophical approach to the QB position. And maybe it's just coincidental...but there are a lot of parallels between the moves made by Ballard's previous org.'s and the moves made by the Colts.    CHI (2001-2012) Drafted (1) QB in the 1st round and that was Rex Grossman at #22 in 2003. CHI had the #4 pick that year and traded back for #13 and #22. Not only did they trade back to #13, they didn't even take a QB with that pick. (That seems like a very Ballard type of move if you ask me.) The only other QB drafted in the top 4 rounds during his entire tenure was Kyle Orton, in the 4th round of 2005 draft.  After the initial options don't work, and because CHI is stuck in QB purgatory by being no worse than 7-9, CHI makes a big trade and sends Orton and picks to DEN for Jay Cutler, a former 1st round pick QB thought to have huge upside.  But Cutler also came with some potential locker room issues and had requested a trade after his relationship with their HC became irreconcilable. (Sounds very familiar). Cutler has some success in CHI, but only wins (1) playoff game in 8 years at QB.  KC (2013 - 2017) Ballard arrives in KC after the 2013 draft. In March, KC had traded (2) 2nd round picks for Alex Smith, with one of those picks being conditional upon playing time. (This is very similar to the type of offer that Ballard gave to PHI.) Smith was a former #1 overall pick QB who had ups and down...and had just been replaced by a backup QB...coincidentally also a 2nd round pick. He had reportedly been working back channels to get out of SF. (Sounds familiar again.) Through Reid's coaching, Smith is actually a pretty damn good QB, but KC only wins (1) playoff game in five seasons (the same number as Cutler in CHI). During this time, KC doesn't draft a QB before the 5th round until 2017 when Ballard is already in Indy. At that point, they make an aggressive trade up in the NFL draft for Mahomes and let Smith mentor him for a season before trading Smith to WAS. So based on this timeline, the Colts are currently several years away from actually drafting a legit QB and thus competing for SBs. I am kidding of course. But there are a lot of parallels here.
  • Members

    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,090

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FortheWin

      FortheWin 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,259

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • brently76

      brently76 10

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 2,618

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,444

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,314

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 166

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,066

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 1,990

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...