Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2013 Colts Starting Offense 2.0


Recommended Posts

Boy this is waste of my time.  I guess we are going to get rid of a a rookie WR that just had 861 yards and 7 TD.  I guess we are going to roll over all of that cap space over for the 2014 offseason.  We are surely going to make a couple of splashes besides one freaking guard.

 

Here is the real lineup

 

QB: Luck

RB: Ballard

LT: Costanzo

RG: Levitre

C: Satele/Shipley or B Jones

LG: Ijalana/ draft pick

RT: Bushrod/Vollmer

TE: Fleener

TE: Allen

WR: Wayne

WR: Hilton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that first guys 2013 starting lineup isnt anybetter than this years team. I think with all the money we are going to do more than one offseason pick up at guard. And why would we trade out of the first with all that money and draft a wide receiver when we have Hilton and dont forget Griff adds depth. More realistic post to the purdue fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting Lineup offense

 

QB-Luck

HB-Brown(if healthy)Ballard (if not)

WR1-Wayne

WR2-Hilton

FB-(Hewitt)surprise pick although it just seems like the natural decision in the 7th round although I'd arguably prefer wr, Buckner)

TE-Allen

LT-Castonzo

LG-Vasquez

C-Shipley

RG-Frederick(would be a natural fit)

RT-Alex Hurst/Winston Justice/Ben Ijalana/William Beatty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the problems we Colts fans have is that we set the bar too low when it comes to the Oline because we are used to mediocrity at those positions.  Look at the Ravens, Pats, and 49ers Olines.  Their QB's don't get touched 90% of the time.  We will never Build the Monster until we have superior talent at the Oline instead of just good enough.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting Lineup offense

 

QB-Luck

HB-Brown(if healthy)Ballard (if not)

WR1-Wayne

WR2-Hilton

FB-(Hewitt)surprise pick although it just seems like the natural decision in the 7th round although I'd arguably prefer wr, Buckner)

TE-Allen

LT-Castonzo

LG-Vasquez

C-Shipley

RG-Frederick(would be a natural fit)

RT-Alex Hurst/Winston Justice/Ben Ijalana/William Beatty

 

By Hewitt, I'm guessing you mean Ryan Hewitt, Stanford's big tight end.

 

He's got one more year.   And he maybe moving to tight end since Stanford is losing both Ertz & Toilolo.

 

He won't be coming out until the 2014 draft.   And I'd guess he'll be a 6th round pick for someone......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By Hewitt, I'm guessing you mean Ryan Hewitt, Stanford's big tight end.

 

He's got one more year.   And he maybe moving to tight end since Stanford is losing both Ertz & Toilolo.

 

He won't be coming out until the 2014 draft.   And I'd guess he'll be a 6th round pick for someone......

Ah ok, thanks for that, did not bother to check to see what year he was (Like I should have) thanks again, in that case I'd just go with Dan Buckner /Mark Harrison/Tyrone Goard/Brandon Kaufman/Emory Blake....raw but tall speed wr's with potentially a great upside with some polishing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...