Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why are we so much better at home?


oldunclemark
 Share

Recommended Posts

i only saw manning play once in his years here at indy. it was a slow low scoring game versus the titans. in the 4th quarter our offense finally started making some plays and the crowd started to roar. manning rushed up to the line and starting the arm flailing to silence the crowd.

 

you see and hear about it on tv, but until you witness first hand 60,000 people going completely silent at once, you just don't understand it. simply amazing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of the teams play better at home.  Crowd has a lot to do with charging the players batteries, the we have to defend our house mentality goes into effect, and the players get to eat and sleep at home (more normal routine)....just a cpl of my thoughts.

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right that we aren't really that young on defense, but you do have a new scheme with a lot of players that are square pegs trying to fit in round holes.  They are also a defense that is put into tough situations (especially on the road) when the very young offense makes mistakes (more turnovers, more inability to sustain drives giving the D rest).  They always say the hardest thing to do in the NFL is learning to win on the road consistently.  

We dont really have that young a team defensively...

7-1 at home and 4-4 on the road..?

...wins over GB and Houston at home.....a road loss to the Jets?

Experince. The dome?


..any thoughts...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

 

 

But Blue Man...true..werent we 0-8 on the road last year...

....but not THIS MUCH better..

NE and Denver are good at home but they're good on the road, too..

How about the Giants and Dallas? Teams like Pittsburgh and Cincinatti are about the same, arent they?

Seattle has a big home field edge..but that team is built nothing like the Colts

It wouldn't let me multi quote.  The good teams find a way to win on the road.  We are a team that is learning what it takes to win on the road.  A young team more than others will have higher highs and lower lows.  And 3 of the 4 road losses were about as low as you could go.  It doesn't explain much but it is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^This. And Peyton Manning has trained the crowd at LOS to be dead silent during offensive drives which make it easier on the offense, which in turn makes it harder for opposing defenses.

I noticed Brazill had his foot on the LOS before the snap, but before the snap he stepped back, probably because a coach let him know about it. Little aspects of the game are affected, which leads to less mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A well coached game.  The counter plays were better covered in the second half....SF made plays in the second half because of individual talent matchups and not defenders being out of position.  The weather and Aiyuk's nonproduction helped to not expose where we lack talent.  The defense was coached well for the talent it has to play with, as usual.  Frank coached a good game on offense.   The DE play was better.  Lewis continued to make a few plays and Paye showed up more than either Turay or Ben have in a couple of years.   Wentz is an excitable guy.  It seemed that the way SF sliced through the D early, Wentz felt the need to play hero ball in the first quarter.  Some of his plays could have been picks and could of lost us the game in the first half.  Nice to see that he settled into understanding the limitations and played well after that.  Overall, I think that he continued to show that he is worth a top 15 first round pick.   JTs "benching" in the late 4Q during "possession time" is what should happen when you put the ball on the ground.  Needed to protected the ball better BEFORE losing it and learning a lesson.   What does Hines do?  He's not really a backup RB (we need a real one), and it seemed the soggy grass totally eliminated his explosiveness. Mack also looked slow on that surface.   Sorry, Nelson has not done what Frank expects him to do when we continually run to the left side.  I assume our LT play has something to do with it, but Nelson is not the SuperGuard that changes the oline.  Franks major fault is that he runs left too much, at least the eye test says those plays get stuffed the most.....all season.   Fisher appears to not have the anchoring or explosion ability.  I assume that the leg may not gain its core strength back until next season.  Playing surface may have effected him, or how he thought about stressing the leg.   Pitt is a nice down field threat, but we still need a real one like PC or TY.   Mo is settling in to be Doyle's replacement.            
    • Make the wild card round, and it is 19th at best for the Eagles. Getting a franchise QB with pick No.19, I will take it any day of the week.
    • Agree, Fluse plays that D mainly because of the players.  It works as good as the opposing QB is for the most part.  The worse the QB, the better that frustrating D works.   Tannehill is a better than average QB, and with excellent weapons.  That team is for real.  Fluse better come up with some new wrinkles for this one.  
    • My wife and I are headed to Indy for the game against the Titans. I know Ruth Cris and St Elmo’s are pricey but are there places in the Indianapolis area to get a good meal? We have a car.    My apologies for posting this in the Colts section but I didn’t know where else to post it. Thanks and go Colts!!!
    • We will have plenty of time to discuss the Cardinals when they come into town close to Christmas. Their squad could change with injuries as well, you never know.    Right now, the Titans are all that matter to me. 4-2-5, 3-3-5, we will have plenty of time to discuss it then. We would have also had to cross the critical wild card competition with the Raiders and Patriots prior to the Cardinals, you are overlooking that as well. Like I said, 1 week at a time since SO MANY things can change in almost 2 months.
  • Members

    • DougDew

      DougDew 3,303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hooch

      Hooch 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FanFromtheWasteland

      FanFromtheWasteland 34

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AddaiStillTruckedYou

      AddaiStillTruckedYou 53

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FRW

      FRW 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoHorse1992

      GoHorse1992 63

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 4,956

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,892

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CheezyColt

      CheezyColt 665

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...