Ndamukong Suh concussion hit upsets Colts player

[gbrads_rants]

I'll leave that to Chicago. They may be looking to get revenge after that (somehow legal) power-bomb of Jay Cutler earlier this year. Plus, they need as much help as they can get on the offensive line.

Chicago's O Line isnt good enough to exact revenge on anyone....

[subvet]

Not a wahmbulance call

Sorry but on what planet and in what context to you laugh and dance over an injured player? Nope, not in football.

First, Suh is not a role model but I also don't see him as a dirty player.

Laughing and dancing? You can see it in almost any game after a good, hard, LEGAL hit--and the officials in the NFL say they are. The kick to Schaub, yes he kicked him but not aiming for a specific area. Look at the position of his head and helmet, there is no clear line of sight and the NFL seems to agree when they fined him but waffled and didn't call it intentional. I'm not going to disagree with the professionals. There have always been a few "hard hitters' sprinkled throughout the league, Hines Ward and James Harrison come to mind, but as long as the league doesn't take action then I don't see the reason to slander intense players.

[Coltsman1788]

If it wasn't for Suh's history, I'd be inclined to believe that perhaps Suh and his team mates were just celebrating the interception and the vicious block on Winston...not necessarily the fact that he was injured.

I watched this game and don't recall seeing or hearing the commentators draw any attention to Suh or any of the Lions players for doing this. Surely it would seem like the commentators would have referenced Suh dancing over an injured player. But I don't recall any mention being made of it.

If Suh was indeed knowingly laughing and dancing over an injured Winston I'd expect the commentators to say something. I'd also expect a Colts player to take issue with it right then. But I don't recall either happening.

[BOTT]

Boohoo.

Great player and tremendous talent.

You don't want him doing that? Knock him on his butt.

You can't? Then deal with it.

....says the guy from his couch

[Nadine]

First, Suh is not a role model but I also don't see him as a dirty player.

Laughing and dancing? You can see it in almost any game after a good, hard, LEGAL hit--and the officials in the NFL say they are. The kick to Schaub, yes he kicked him but not aiming for a specific area. Look at the position of his head and helmet, there is no clear line of sight and the NFL seems to agree when they fined him but waffled and didn't call it intentional. I'm not going to disagree with the professionals. There have always been a few "hard hitters' sprinkled throughout the league, Hines Ward and James Harrison come to mind, but as long as the league doesn't take action then I don't see the reason to slander intense players.

slander? I don't see any slander. I see calling attention to what he did. And if he did it, he deserves the spotlight.

Laughing and dancing over an injured player is over the line,

Agree to disagree on this one.

[jahsoul]

....says the guy from his couch

That also goes for the people that is calling Suh a thug. *pot/kettle*

[superrep1967]

Earlier this week, my buddy and I were discussing Suh's hit on Schaub, Arians' comments on Suh and the fear of a "tampering" investigation. My buddy basically alluded to Suh being nothing more than a thug. I defended him, referring to him as a "passionate" player. After reading what he did to Justice, I eat my words. This guy is a lowlife who deserves to be punished. I lost any respect I formally had for him. I'm glad our ballclub is full of upstanding and inspirational players. Scoreboard Ndamukung! You know who else is named "Suh"? My aunt!

[BOTT]

That also goes for the people that is calling Suh a thug. *pot/kettle*

except i didn't call him a thug...and *apples/oranges*

[NewEra]

Dirty thug...

[jahsoul]

except i didn't call him a thug...and *apples/oranges*

I wasn't specifically talking about you but I was using your quote because it applied. And what I was talking about isn't an apple to oranges thing. The same way the guy made his comment from is couch is equivalent to others talking tough calling Suh a thug, trash, whatever.

[dudeman]

....says the guy from his couch

What's with absolutes? He could be anywhere or anyone. Perhaps you're unaware that a large portion of the Internet-fairing society as access to the network on a variety of devices and locations.

[chrisfarley]

Since there is no video of this, this issue will die on the desk of what's his face (leader of officials).

[BOTT]

What's with absolutes? He could be anywhere or anyone. Perhaps you're unaware that a large portion of the Internet-fairing society as access to the network on a variety of devices and locations.

you totally missed the point

[BOTT]

I wasn't specifically talking about you but I was using your quote because it applied. And what I was talking about isn't an apple to oranges thing. The same way the guy made his comment from is couch is equivalent to others talking tough calling Suh a thug, trash, whatever.

do i really have to point out the obvious? geez....

[chrisfarley]

NdarnUKONG SUH

It's pretty bad when you cant even type his name. it has to mask what it thinks is a bad word, which his name includes. tells us all we need to know about this dirty player.

[The Peytonator]

That also goes for the people that is calling Suh a thug. *pot/kettle*

The pot/kettle metaphor doesn't work here. That's like saying if you call a spade a spade, it makes you a shovel (or other spade-like tool). The only people that don't think Suh is a thug are Lions/Cornhusker fans.

[subvet]

slander? I don't see any slander. I see calling attention to what he did. And if he did it, he deserves the spotlight.

Laughing and dancing over an injured player is over the line,

Agree to disagree on this one.

Agreed. I'm used to losing arguments with my wife....

[dudeman]

you totally missed the point

Nope, I was right on point which was that your statement was completely nonsensical, because you of your assumptions of who the poster is. I take it linguistics isn't your (Matt) forte?

[BOTT]

Nope, I was right on point which was that your statement was completely nonsensical, because you of your assumptions of who the poster is. I take it linguistics isn't your (Matt) forte?

i take it logic isn't your forte? a two year old could figure i what i was saying.....

[dudeman]

i take it logic isn't your forte? a two year old could figure i what i was saying.....

Assuming someone is on the couch (which alludes to a weakling) and therefore somehow can't say that when you have absolutely zero idea who they actually are or capable of doing is somehow logical? Well, snap. I what i were you saying again?

[The Peytonator]

Assuming someone is on the couch (which alludes to a weakling) and therefore somehow can't say that when you have absolutely zero idea who they actually are or capable of doing is somehow logical? Well, snap.

Dude......Man.......it was a joke.

[jahsoul]

The pot/kettle metaphor doesn't work here. That's like saying if you call a spade a spade, it makes you a shovel (or other spade-like tool). The only people that don't think Suh is a thug are Lions/Cornhusker fans.

How many on here think Marvin Harrison is a thug? I'm just saying..

[IndyTrav]

....says the guy from his couch

It's a forum. We are all guys/girls on the couch....

I just tire of hearing grown men complain about other grown men. "He's dirty, he's done this, or that".

Suh seems to have the school yard bully stigma. If you are tired of the school yard bully, go punch him in the mouth.

[Steagles]

Reminds me of Asante Samuel and Austin Collie.

[subvet]

How many on here think Marvin Harrison is a thug? I'm just saying..

Dwight Dixon--but he's a drug dealer.....I'm just saying....lol!

[jahsoul]

Dwight Dixon--but he's a drug dealer.....I'm just saying....lol!

LMBO...

A dead one also. Moral of the story, don't mess with "2-Gun" Harrison..lol.

*disclaimer*

This poster is not making light of death. Murder is a serious issue and those who commit it should be prosecuted.

[BOTT]

Assuming someone is on the couch (which alludes to a weakling) and therefore somehow can't say that when you have absolutely zero idea who they actually are or capable of doing is somehow logical? Well, snap. I what i were you saying again?

dear god, it had nothing to do with a "couch"....please don't respond, because this is clearly a waste of time

[dw49]

Word is out today that there will be no fine as there is no video evidence of any wrong doing. Coach also chimmed in saying....

But Lions coach Jim Schwartz, on Monday, said there's nothing on the coaches' film to support McGlynn's accusations and that his players were simply excited about the interception and making blocks to support a return.

"What shows on the coaches' film is we make an interception with six minutes to go and we're up two scores and looks like it's a really great chance to be able to win that game. Guys were looking to make blocks; guys made blocks," Schwartz said. "It's off after that. There were no penalties on that play. Our guys were rightfully excited. We had a very good pass rush on that. The quarterback, like we had talked about all week, had to elevate his throw.