-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
To summarize. Young is a small person by NFL standards, who has a great brain for the game but not a great arm in terms of strength, accuracy when on the move. And is very athletic but not really athletically elite. Maybe Young could be described as being an athletic version of Chad Pennington? Not unlike Purdy or Bennett. Where was Chad drafted?
-
Beats me. But generally speaking, I think having teams "prove their innocence" by measuring how many minorities are hired...and incentivizing it if the results aren't good enough.... is a method that creates weird processes that defy common sense, IMO, if not defying the spirit of rule making and enforcement. LIke the rooney rule. Requiring minorities to be "interviewed" means nothing when it comes to deciding who to hire from a pool of interviewed candidates. Now, many people are seeing the flaws with the process, because the process is weird. It lacked common sense the day it was passed. And they admit it now because they are not getting the results they want. Just backwards as *. A rational process doesn't make decisions like that. That's why I called it nonsense.
-
By MikeCurtis · Posted
First off.. Thanks Superman for writing this up on Young I would be very happy with either Young or Stroud as our pick In regards to Richardson If teams trade up and both Young and Stroud are gone (I think its a small chance) But.... If that happens, I would consider taking Richardson over Levis at 4 I really dont want to give up 2 firsts and 2 2nds and a player for a move up to 1
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now