Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Well....arian Foster Is Going To Play Week 1 Despite Hamstring Injury...


Recommended Posts

Foster downplays injury, says he will start for Texans Week 1

While Texans coach Gary Kubiak was cautiously optimistic about Arian Foster's status after he tweaked his hamstring, the Houston running back tweeted Sunday he will play Week 1.

My link

I dont want the guy to get hurt bad because i really wanted him to bot play week 1 because all we would ahve to worry about on the O is A. JOHNSOn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vonta Leach deserves 50% of the credit you are giving Foster.

I don't know how you can come up with a percentage,many great backs have had good blocking fullbacks.For that matter how many backs can have success with a poor line?The one guy that i remember was walter payton,i am sure there were others,but not many.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how you can come up with a percentage,many great backs have had good blocking fullbacks.For that matter how many backs can have success with a poor line?The one guy that i remember was walter payton,i am sure there were others,but not many.

barry sanders did it with absolutely no line

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like others mentioned, I am not completely sold on Foster. He needs to prove that his incredible season was because of him and not because of Leach. If he doesn't have a 1000 yard season this year or next, he will be considered a one year wonder and everyone will know he only did well because of Leach's blocking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One year wonder, i dont see him having a season like that anymore.

Couldn't agree more, Smitto.

Let us see him in an iso situation without a FB. Or w/out Leach, if he can go for 1300+ for another year or two in either of those situations, he will arrive. Last year was just that, a year. Let us see it in multiple years. Shaun Alexander ran wild too... then he was out of the league.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't agree more, Smitto.

Let us see him in an iso situation without a FB. Or w/out Leach, if he can go for 1300+ for another year or two in either of those situations, he will arrive. Last year was just that, a year. Let us see it in multiple years. Shaun Alexander ran wild too... then he was out of the league.

If he is good as alexander,then they have a player.Shaun made the probowl 3 times and was a mvp.You made may want to change your rb comparisons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't down play the HOU RB core. Foster may be good, but Tate was slated to start last year, Slaton has a 1200yd50rec season already, and Ward rushed well last year in the backup role. Houston will eat up yards regardless of who is running the ball, don't let Fosters hammy fool you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't agree more, Smitto.

Let us see him in an iso situation without a FB. Or w/out Leach, if he can go for 1300+ for another year or two in either of those situations, he will arrive. Last year was just that, a year. Let us see it in multiple years. Shaun Alexander ran wild too... then he was out of the league.

Definitely with no fullback plus, the defense this year is gonna be focused on him. He's no AP so i see him having an average year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vonta Leach deserves 50% of the credit you are giving Foster.

I really liked the block that Leach threw, to get Ray Rice in for a touchdown, during the Ravens vs Redskins game. Leach was a huge aquisition for Baltimore and a big loss for Houston. I think Foster's numbers come down significantly this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arian Foster is good. He stays healthy, and he will continue to be good. But don't expect him to have another season like the one he just had. Teams are ready for him, teams will game for him. He will have a major letdown this season, and we have a chance to start that process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with those who are saying a good portion of Foster's success was due to the blocking of Vonte Leach. Leach and Harvey Dahl were the two free agent I was most wishing the Colts would sign during the free agent freenzy. Would have been awesome to add that dimension to our offense... Baltimore will reap the benefits of Leach. And the Rams did themselves a huge favor by signing Dahl. I'm happy with who we did pick up, and I'm optimistic about our season.

Also, I think we are going to own Foster and the Texans run game in Week 1. It'll be the story of the week in the NFL. ESPN will dedicate an entire 20 sec segment to discussing it, probably all say it was an apparition, and then proceed to talk endlessly about the Yankees, Red Sox, and Cowboys.

GO COLTS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vonta Leach deserves 50% of the credit you are giving Foster.

You're right....especially since Leach was only on the field blocking for Arian less than half the time he received the ball. :loco: Y'all might want to go and do some actual research. The majority of the time that Arian ran the ball last season, Leach wasn't even on the field and Foster had a HIGHER YPC average out of a single back set.

But like another poster already mentioned. This thread is kinda pointless, because even if Arian can't go Houston has excellent depth at that position and if the right one can't get you, the left one will. We'll be fine at tailback week 1. How's Peyton's neck coming along? I hope he falls in my draft. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arian has overlooked talent, yes he has OUTSTANDING support from his line, TE's, and FB's.

But an earlier poster here said they'd like to see him in a 1 on 1 situation. Are you serious?? The guy is 6'1, 230 pounds, he does more than well in the open field when he's passed the line of scrimmage. He's also a pretty darn good pass catcher, and blocker.

The Texans surprised not only us, but the league last year with this running attack, and no defense last year had a legitimate answer for Foster. There were times where he made the play, and had to improvise. Even when teams knew the run was coming, they couldn't stop them.

I don't know if some fans here are still bitter from that beat down he gave us last year, but you gotta give credit where credit is due. We can't just undermine the guys talent, he had a heck of season last year. Not to mention he's a class act.

Now the Texans have GREAT depth at RB my goodness. Arain Foster does make a difference, but having Ben Tate(beast runner btw, leg injury stopped him from starting last year) start shouldn't hurt. Either way Foster played with hammy issues the latter half of 2011, and finished fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah he brutalized the Colts overall. There was no stopping him, 333 rushing yards, 72 receiving yards 48 rushing attempts, 0 TDs but also 0 Fums the two times we played him.

Hopefully we can hold him to alittle over 100 rushing yards but that's a task for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foster downplays injury, says he will start for Texans Week 1

While Texans coach Gary Kubiak was cautiously optimistic about Arian Foster's status after he tweaked his hamstring, the Houston running back tweeted Sunday he will play Week 1.

My link

I dont want the guy to get hurt bad because i really wanted him to bot play week 1 because all we would ahve to worry about on the O is A. JOHNSOn

1) The game is 2 weeks away. Neither Foster or Kubiak have a clue of his availability for the opener. Their commentary is meaningless right now.

2) The notion that all the Colts have to worry about is AJ should Foster not play is comical. They have playmakers all over the field. I am surprised you don't know this since, as you have said, you live in Houston.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arian has overlooked talent, yes he has OUTSTANDING support from his line, TE's, and FB's.

But an earlier poster here said they'd like to see him in a 1 on 1 situation. Are you serious?? The guy is 6'1, 230 pounds, he does more than well in the open field when he's passed the line of scrimmage. He's also a pretty darn good pass catcher, and blocker.

The Texans surprised not only us, but the league last year with this running attack, and no defense last year had a legitimate answer for Foster. There were times where he made the play, and had to improvise. Even when teams knew the run was coming, they couldn't stop them.

I don't know if some fans here are still bitter from that beat down he gave us last year, but you gotta give credit where credit is due. We can't just undermine the guys talent, he had a heck of season last year. Not to mention he's a class act.

Now the Texans have GREAT depth at RB my goodness. Arain Foster does make a difference, but having Ben Tate(beast runner btw, leg injury stopped him from starting last year) start shouldn't hurt. Either way Foster played with hammy issues the latter half of 2011, and finished fine.

Im definitely not bitter, its called a reality and i believe the jets kept him in check he didnt even get over 30yds there... Arian is not gonna be under the radar this year, he's gonna have a hard time gaining some yds this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im definitely not bitter, its called a reality and i believe the jets kept him in check he didnt even get over 30yds there... Arian is not gonna be under the radar this year, he's gonna have a hard time gaining some yds this season.

Again, agreed with Smitto on this topic.

I'm not bitter at all; we are taken to the woodshed last year. Never, ever was bitter towards him. I'm stating, what RB has came back nearly as strong from a season like that? I agree he goes for atleast 1100, but won't come near his total yardage of last year. Look at history, it does not happen. With that said, Tate + Ward give the Texans a RB trio that if not shut down early will dictate the entire game. Teams know what to do to beat Houston, the question will always remain, "Can they?".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im definitely not bitter, its called a reality and i believe the jets kept him in check he didnt even get over 30yds there... Arian is not gonna be under the radar this year, he's gonna have a hard time gaining some yds this season.

Well even the best rushers get stopped every once in a while, that's football. But are you kidding me?? He had 84yds, and 2TD's against the Jets.

He won't have a hard time at all getting yards. The only team he was under the radar for this year, was us. Are you telling me, after his first 3 games, people still didn't gameplan for the Texans running game? So that's exactly why some teams would put 8 in the box on running downs, right? And exactly why Rex Ryan and the Jets were able to somewhat contain him, right?

Face it, the guy was overlooked talent. Yeah his line is darn good, but he made some plays on his own this season. There are somethings you can't coach, and things that are simply overlooked during the draft, like heart. Just ask Tom Brady.

Yea he probably won't have the same crazy successful season, but there is no doubt that he'll break 1100+yds, and 10+ TD' if he's healthy the whole year.

No one would be having this discussion if he was a 1st Round Draft Pick :P. None of the top RB's in the game today rush behind a bad run blocking line, and if there is one, please name em'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foster was scary last year against the Colts, but so were lots of other backs. And the Texans passing game obviously affects the defensive alignment. You can't cheat against them to stop Foster. I didn't see much of him against other opponents. It seems to me, however, that he may be less likely to be able to make things happen without a gaping hole (compared to someone like Maurice Jones-Drew or Ray Rice). He's a weapon, but perhaps a little bit more a product of the system than a star.

The point is that if our D-line is better we won't give up the chunks we gave up last year. It it isn't better, it may not matter who they put in at RB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well even the best rushers get stopped every once in a while, that's football. But are you kidding me?? He had 84yds, and 2TD's against the Jets.

He won't have a hard time at all getting yards. The only team he was under the radar for this year, was us. Are you telling me, after his first 3 games, people still didn't gameplan for the Texans running game? So that's exactly why some teams would put 8 in the box on running downs, right? And exactly why Rex Ryan and the Jets were able to somewhat contain him, right?

Face it, the guy was overlooked talent. Yeah his line is darn good, but he made some plays on his own this season. There are somethings you can't coach, and things that are simply overlooked during the draft, like heart. Just ask Tom Brady.

Yea he probably won't have the same crazy successful season, but there is no doubt that he'll break 1100+yds, and 10+ TD' if he's healthy the whole year.

No one would be having this discussion if he was a 1st Round Draft Pick :P. None of the top RB's in the game today rush behind a bad run blocking line, and if there is one, please name em'.

I meant the NY Giants averaging 2.5 a carry... and the Jets game he averaged 3.8.... Point is if a defense is bent on stopping him they will stop him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah he brutalized the Colts overall. There was no stopping him, 333 rushing yards, 72 receiving yards 48 rushing attempts, 0 TDs but also 0 Fums the two times we played him.

Hopefully we can hold him to alittle over 100 rushing yards but that's a task for sure.

Actually he scored 4 touchdowns. 3 in the first and 1 in the other game

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any doctors in here?

Foster tweeted the MRI of his ham string. Most are saying, after viewing the MRI, that the odds are very low that he'll be ready week 1. One doctor said minimum 2 weeks.

Who knows. Could he be STUPID enough to tweet HIS actual MRI?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any doctors in here?

Foster tweeted the MRI of his ham string. Most are saying, after viewing the MRI, that the odds are very low that he'll be ready week 1. One doctor said minimum 2 weeks.

Who knows. Could he be STUPID enough to tweet HIS actual MRI?

Wouldn't surprise me if he did. There's alot of athletes in the NFL that obviously got graded under the table in college if you know what I mean! How many fantasy owners are trembling about his draft rank now? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foster was scary last year against the Colts, but so were lots of other backs. And the Texans passing game obviously affects the defensive alignment. You can't cheat against them to stop Foster. I didn't see much of him against other opponents. It seems to me, however, that he may be less likely to be able to make things happen without a gaping hole (compared to someone like Maurice Jones-Drew or Ray Rice). He's a weapon, but perhaps a little bit more a product of the system than a star.

The point is that if our D-line is better we won't give up the chunks we gave up last year. It it isn't better, it may not matter who they put in at RB.

Your D-line would have to be significantly better. Foster put up yards on some of the best Ds in the NFL last year.

Rex Ryans D was the only one who could slow down Foster.

And as someone already mentioned...Vonta was only on the field with Foster 38% of the time. And he got more ypc without him.

The Texans made the right choice to let Vonta go. You dont need an all pro FB to have a good run game,all you need is someone who can get in the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defense should focus on not over pursuing and hitting the right holes. Plan against their blocking schemes , not which RB will play.

Im more worried about the way the secondary has been playing. Shorten those zones, please? Hopefully the Dline will overwhelm the passing game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No doubt any move is a gamble of some kind or another. If its an older guy, is the player injury prone or on the downhill side of his career? If a younger guy, will he still perform with serious coin in his pocket for the first time? But in the end, you have to look at recent production. If the guy has a good rep for being a hard worker and improved his play such that he's become an impact player, he's worth the gamble, IMO. Maybe not for a contract longer than 3 years, but I like taking a shot at an ascending talent.    More importantly, if you believe, as I do, that the defense HAS to get much better at rushing the passer, especially since our D coordinator seems to have a serious allergy to blitzing, then the push to find that missing piece has to take its place front and center over other needs. 
    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...