Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

***Colts Vs. Packers Game Day Thread***

Recommended Posts

They did choose to ignore a blatant offsides.

Oh for the replacement refs on that one....they hate cheeseheads :):funny::sarcasm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

going for it was a necessity. The play-call was terri-bad

its not necessary on the wrong side of the field with the game 0-0 knowing how potent Green Bays offense is, you punt and make them earn every yard, it was pretty obvious we were going to be down 7-0 in huge part because of that call, our offense was moving the ball fine except a couple penalties

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was speaking of the front 7

gotcha. Still, with the linebackers, they have gaps and containments to worry about. If they all go after the ball, they'll miss their assignments and be benched...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bad call

No...it wasn't. Bad decision by Redding. I called it within a second

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're gonna lose without you helping us refs, let 'em play.

The refs are fine. Our young club is not. Not one bad call yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's something to ponder:

When Rodgers throws to a double covered player, they say he is confident. If Luck were to do the same thing, they say he is playing like a rookie. I understand the explanation (Rodgers is a proven vet and Luck is a rookie), but it's just something fun to think about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gotcha. Still, with the linebackers, they have gaps and containments to worry about. If they all go after the ball, they'll miss their assignments and be benched...

if they go for there gaps and not for the ball (most times plays dont go exactly how defenses draw it up anyway) then your in your gap but the ball is who knows where (literally if players worry solely about there gap they seem to ignore the whole idea of defense, go for the guy with the ball)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The refs are fine. Our young club is not. Not one bad call yet.

Definitely have to agree. Colts are facing a MUCH superior team. Things tend to get ugly when that happens.

Lol for example Bruce Arians throwing that challenge flag. haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HURPA DURPA.....I'm like a forklift driver and I knew better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mathis was hurting....came right back in....what a stud....win or lose!!!!! A consummate professional and :helmet: :helmet: :helmet::coltshelmet: :coltshelmet: :coltshelmet: :coltshelmet:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the South Bend market and some jerk made the decision to not air the Colts game today, really caught me by surprise. Can anyone tell me if the game is on Sunday Ticket? I am considering buying the mobile version of Sunday Ticket to be able to watch the game. Not sure that it's worth it at this point as I do have RedZone, but this is driving me nuts! Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this wasn't addressed to me, but Milwaukee goes to St Louis again second weekend in September. I would have thought they could finish this game then. I think maybe Rob Manfred just wanted a shorter game. Who knows.
    • IR. PUP. Starts Wk 1.    That's covered it. 
    • Multiple times I have said the length of the deal would be the issue...like probably in four different posts in this thread. But I think there are people who would even be against paying a RB (like Zeke) that much money for 1-2 years...or wouldn't even give up a late pick for him.    I brought up Funchess because signing Zeke would be akin to signing a Funchess each offseason for a few years. From a financial standpoint...that's not unreasonable. The picks are a different discussion...but Zeke is also on a completely different level...and there is going to be an acquisition cost to getting a player like that.    The bit about Mack was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. The rest of my comment isn't meant to be an attack or even a generalization...it's just an observation about what I have seen in many fans the past year (the Mack situation actually predated a lot of this).   There seems to be a theme...that when a talented non-Colts player vet is mentioned as a possibility to acquire (who would have a cost attached)...there are many that are either dismissive or against it...to the point that late round picks are too much to give up. I think that happens more often than people ignoring the acquisition cost and saying "gimme, gimme." (To be fair...I think saying people "routinely" ignore the acquisition cost is as much of an unfair representation or generalization as what I said...just on the opposite spectrum).   I respect your opinion...and we actually agree on many things (including aspects of roster construction)...I just think I must be in the minority when it comes to taking 'big swings' around here.
    • So here we are again, bunches of cap money, hoping our draft picks are as good as last year, but sweating our QB issue.     How many draft picks are we gonna horde?   How much cap space are we gonna bank?   I realize this deal with Zeke might be just a rumor and forum fodder, but if we have a chance to bring him in, I say yes.  As I, and many other members have said many times, we have a QB that can win a super bowl, but so far we have wasted the opportunity because we lack that 1 player that completes the puzzle.     Andrew has suffered more pain playing on our team then any other Colt's player that I can recall,  I say again, it's time to loosen the purse strings and sign some proven talent to give him a fighting chance.
    • I don't look for him to do much at DT. He played really limited snaps on the interior, really only when they game was far out of hand. Much like here in Indy, there were much better guys on that interior at Ohio State. Tyquan didn't get many "meaningful" snaps inside. Even now he's going to get limited snaps inside because Autry, Hunt, and Ward as just better interior players. I still think he would be a good, cheap replacement, for Sheard, if they got him back down in the 260's. He's good against the run and may get a handful of sacks a year against average RT's. I still scratch my head on why they insist on doing what they are doing with him now.     Yea that's not the story. Him and J Bosa were the starting DE's until they left. Hubbard eventually took over for Bosa when he left and Chase was still sitting behind Tyquan, Nick, and Sam. Chase will be a stud though and I have no doubts he'll be a top-10 pick next year barring injury. 6-5 265 with stupid athleticism, and is equally as good against the run as he is rushing the passer.   Maybe they were thinking Tyquan could turn into a Michael Bennett-type, who can bounce inside and outside on the fly, but I just don't see him being that kind of guy. He wasn't overly athletic at 260'ish, so he's definitely going be hindered with another 10-15-20lbs.
  • Members

    • hippiejohn

      hippiejohn 63

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 167

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 989

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,100

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 6,926

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Swan Ronson

      Swan Ronson 279

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,283

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 8,688

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 332

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...