Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Bill Belichick Grabs Official

wallieump99

By wallieump99
in NFL General

 Share

Recommended Posts

Vltrophy1 Walk On

Vltrophy1

Posted
Posted

Players get kicked out of the game. If he's not suspended I look for at least a very high 5 figure fine. Since the Packers don't have an "owner" I'd love to see the look on the face of Kraft,Jones or Skins owner if that same thing happens to them. Will they still say the refs are doing a great job WITH a smile on their face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

GoColts8818 Ring of Honor

GoColts8818

Posted
Posted

Players get kicked out of the game. If he's not suspended I look for at least a very high 5 figure fine. Since the Packers don't have an "owner" I'd love to see the look on the face of Kraft,Jones or Skins owner if that same thing happens to them. Will they still say the refs are doing a great job WITH a smile on their face.

Saw on twitter that it was $25,000 for Shanahan and the league is going to fine BB (didn't say how much) and John Harbaugh will not get a fine. This goes back to what I said at the time with Harbaugh you had to wait for him to do something before you could punish him. Since he took a time out on the very next play he has a very legit case he might have just been trying to get a timeout and not yell at the officals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoKeR Walk On

JoKeR

Posted
Posted

Jules was right; that FG was no good.

Doubt it? Watch it yourself:

Btw, watch the game film, and you'll notice one thing: the refs don't even look up to see if it was good.

Awesome.

That's a bad angle and it was good. If the ball goes over the top of the post, it's good. Its has to go high and outside of the post for it to be no good.

If you drew a imaginary post, extending above the real post, and the ball hits the imaginary post, it's good. It would have to go outside of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JoKeR Walk On

JoKeR

Posted
Posted

That's a bad angle and it was good. If the ball goes over the top of the post, it's good. Its has to go high and outside of the post for it to be no good.

If you drew a imaginary post, extending above the real post, and the ball hits the imaginary post, it's good. It would have to go outside of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ViriLudant Walk On

ViriLudant

Posted
Posted

That's a bad angle and it was good. If the ball goes over the top of the post, it's good. Its has to go high and outside of the post for it to be no good.

If you drew a imaginary post, extending above the real post, and the ball hits the imaginary post, it's good. It would have to go outside of that.

That's untrue.

Sorry.

Rule is, the ball has to be WITHIN the upright, not above it. Above does not = good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RGIII Walk On

RGIII

Posted
Posted

That's untrue.

Sorry.

Rule is, the ball has to be WITHIN the upright, not above it. Above does not = good.

Fact-checking is critically important when you enter in to a discussion where you are insistent upon an idea that most people disagree with. :2c:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
Posted

That's untrue.

Sorry.

Rule is, the ball has to be WITHIN the upright, not above it. Above does not = good.

That's what I thought but that's actually not true..according to the announcers...

The ball has to go over any part of the post..just like a TD has to see the ball go over any parrt of the pylon.

the kick was good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoColts8818 Ring of Honor

GoColts8818

Posted
Posted

That's untrue.

Sorry.

Rule is, the ball has to be WITHIN the upright, not above it. Above does not = good.

Steve tasker who I don't agree with on much but I will agree he knows his special teams stuff said on Sunday when kicked his second kick which was a lot like the ravens kick that all a ball needed to do was catch a peace of the goal post if it went over the top he said even if caught the outside and would other wise bounce off no good if the post were extended it was good. He did a really good job breaking it down in the colts game and might be worth mistening to if you can find it
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
Posted

fgrule.jpg

..again..This is accoridng to game announcers.last week

This is the rule but its open to interpertaiuon..and the acepted iner[ertaion (by everyone but Belichik)

is that the ball has to pass over rthe outside edges of the post plane

It does NOT say the ENTIRE ball has to pass between the outside edges of the imaginary extended post.

..as I said before..this was news to me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ruksak Walk On

ruksak

Posted
Posted

That's what I thought but that's actually not true..according to the announcers...

The ball has to go over any part of the post..just like a TD has to see the ball go over any parrt of the pylon.

the kick was good.

The rule that FJC posted clearly says different. Do not put too much stock in what announcers say. They said Monday night that simultaneous possession is not reviewable, but that's wrong. It is reviewable, but only in the endzone.

The problem is, the camera angle offers a false perspective.

As seen here;

falseperspective.jpg

A false perspective dramatically skews any ability to concisely evaluate how object X aligns with object Y. As to the rule, I'm going with FJC's offering of the actual rule, which clearly says "all of the ball must pass through the outside edges".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yehoodi Walk On

Yehoodi

Posted
Posted

I think they should add a camera on the top of the goal posts, and make them review-able.

I think, as FJC said, a laser on the outer edge of the goal post would work best as they are at the outer point of the FG good area . . . if the ball passers over and there is no laser shown on the ball, then the laser does not hit the ball and its good . . . if however the ball passes outside of the outer edge of the goal post, and therefore not good, the laser will be reflected on the ball and easier deemed not good . ..

btw, the ref should of stopped and talked to BB and not simply run off the field . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yehoodi Walk On

Yehoodi

Posted
Posted

It's good to know ruksak that there are some smooth operators and ladies men on here.

I'm like a dog chasing a car, if I caught a pretty one, I would have no idea what to do with it anyway. haha:funny::lol:

1968-charger.jpg

I was only ever good at chasing cars . . . heres one that should make you all Plum Crazy . . . :hippie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Superman
      Colts have the 15th pick in the draft. (MERGE)

      By Superman · Posted

      I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • NewColtsFan
      Colts have the 15th pick in the draft. (MERGE)

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
    • richard pallo
      Bold predictions for the draft

      By richard pallo · Posted

      Bold prediction?    I will predict either Kwity or Pierce will be traded sometime during the draft.
    • stitches
      Colts have the 15th pick in the draft. (MERGE)

      By stitches · Posted

      I will post a few mock drafts from people who are really highly ranked in The Huddle Reports' mock draft competitions over the last few years:   Brendan Donahue(tied for highest score over the last 5 years) https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/2024-nfl-mock-draft-brendan-donahue/ Interesting things:  -Vikings trade up to 5 for McCarthy -Colts get Brock Bowers at 15.    Eddie Brown(tied for highest score over the last 5 years) https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/2024-nfl-mock-draft-eddie-brown-s-final-first-round-projections/ar-AA1nCo1i Interesting things: - JC Latham at 5 to the Chargers(Jeremiah has the same pick) - Rome Odunze to the Giants at 6, Nabers to Atlanta at 8 - Philly trades up to 12 for Quinyon Mitchell - Colts get Brock Bowers(seems to be a trend...)     David P. Woods(3d highest score over the last 5 years): https://www.thescore.com/nfl/news/2900023 Interesting things:  - Vikings trade up to 5 for McCarthy(seems like this is the current divide - this pick will be either Latham to the Chargers or Vikings trade up) - Odunze to Giants at 6!!! Nabers to Atlanta at 8. Second one with those specific picks.  - Colts get Quinyon Mitchell   Ben Standig (3 times Huddle report mock draft champion!): https://www.benstandig.com/post/ben-standig-s-2024-nfl-mock-draft-final Interesting things:  - Vikings trade up to 5 for McCarthy - Colts TRADE UP to 8 for Odunze!! Interesting....    Sean Green(Last year's Huddle report mock draft co-champion): https://www.sportsgamblingpodcast.com/2024/04/23/2024-nfl-mock-draft-sean-green-final-mock-draft/ Interesting things:  - Nabers goes 4 to Arizona, MHJ 6 to Giants - Chargers go Taliese Fuaga at 5.  - Colts get Quinyon Mitchell            
    • John Waylon
      2024 NBA, Pacers and all NBA talk

      By John Waylon · Posted

      Much better bounce back Tuesday. They seemed to find a certain confidence they lacked Sunday. The defense was really good. They weathered the Lillard storm and seemed to bother him more as the game went on. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...