Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should I Start Wayne, Clark, And Or Garcon Week 1?


ReMeDy

Recommended Posts

This decision will be make-or-break for me week 1. I made the mistake of thinking Peyton would be in week 1, but now I doubt it, especially if Wayne is moaning about the signing. Does Wayne know something we dont? I think Manning is out week 1, but they don't want us to know.

Assuming Manning is out week 1, that leaves Collins. In Collins first three games his last two new teams (Titans in ’06 and Raiders in ’04), Collins is a combined 0-6 with two touchdowns and 13 interceptions. We also need to factor in Collins is older, so perhaps he lacks arm strength. Furthermore, obviously Wayne hates Collins. Could we possibly see Wayne not play to his full potential, or in the worst case scenario, purposely play poorly?

http://blogs.nfl.com/2011/08/24/collins-signing-should-make-fantasy-owners-nervous/

On the other hand, the Texans had the worst ranked pass defense in the NFL last season, but with the addition of Wade Phillips, this should improve things; however, the transition from a 4-3 to a 3-4 takes time. Unfortunately, I think Phillips will blitz Collins like mad, and I think it will work considering Costanzo and Ijalana are rookies, Collins is new, and they're playing @ Houston, so crowd noise will be a factor.

Call me crazy, but I think I'm going to bench all three players. I just don't like this match-up one bit. Here's my fantasy roster:

fantasyRoster.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Okay, in light of Manning regarded as highly doubtful for week 1, its very clear to me even if he does somehow play that he will have almost zero practice time, so Kerry Collins is the most likely scenario. My guess is the coaching staff will tell Collins to play to the Colts strengths by throwing to Wayne and Clark, so I suspect Collie, Garcon, etc. will see reduced catches.

So I will start Wayne and Clark, but bench Garcon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would only consider Wayne and Clark. I actually have Wayne and plan to start. My question is why so many colts players?

Because my mentality at the time of the draft (well before the time I posted the topic) was you can never go wrong with Peyton Manning! Well turns out, I guess things can go wrong :(. Plus, the Colts traditionally always have to fight back to get points and they love to play with a lead, so Manning generally throws it 35+ times a game sometimes, so win or lose, Manning throws the ball, a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if the Colts get a WR in the top-50 picks, or so,  I think the Colts would agree with you. 
    • welp, after another week of developments, rumors, and predictions…here is where I stand:   1.  My personal top 5 for our first has not changed.  Mitchell, Arnold, Turner, BTJ, Bowers are still who id be ok with picking at 15.  I’ve said it before, but this is one of the most “it can go any way for us” drafts I’ve witnessed for us in a long time, if not ever.     2.  With the rumors of us looking to trade up, I AM ALL FOR IT.  It’s ok to play it safe and build your team, but that gets mediocrity.  We need to go out and get a guy.  A player we KNOW that will be elite or very good.  Not one that we hope can do that.  I think MHJ is definitely going to the Cards (if they don’t trade out) so that means either Nabers or Odunze who we’re probably trading for if they fall to 8 or 9.  Id prefer Nabers over Odunze.  Nabers is that blazing separator we desperately need, Odunze is possessive beast, but I feel we already have that with MPJ.  I don’t think trading up for bowers would be worth it.     3.  Trading back is an absolute no for me.  As said above, we have to start getting bonafide players and studs.  If we have a chance to get a bonafide stud, then we shouldn’t give it up.  Trading back and giving up the chance to get someone is lowering the talent level of our first pick.  Let’s get aggressive for once and get OUR guy.  If we can’t, let’s stay put and draft a player who will be VERY good.  
    • FYI Castro went back to college at Iowa this upcoming season.  Look for Sebastian in the 2025 NFL Draft.
    • Like most QBs they need a safety blanket to throw to and that can be a TE.  Draft rumor-mill already in full circulation with news that the Colts want to trade up on Day 1.  Still think it's a long shot to draft a legacy in MHJ reaching P4 with the Cardinals.  A trade up to P8 with Atlanta is probably the most realistic scenario and TE Bowers would be the call-in.  Not sold on most of this year's draftable QBs and doubt 4 or more will be drafted within the top-8 picks.  See the draft play out like every other year where teams can stay and get a serviceable QB. 
    • This could very well be the rare year we do trade up on Day 1.  Really shocked if we go after a legacy and the cost might be too rich for the short-term versus draft immediate draft needs.  Now a trade up to say P8 swap with Atlanta has a higher percentage of happening I do feel.  No way going to trade within our division with the Titans at P7.  At P8 should still have one of the top-3 WRs or even better option of drafting a generational TE in Bowers. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...