Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Defense needs to be focal point in draft


Recommended Posts

Free agency we can add some pieces on OL and maybe a WR. I see a couple quality guys we could add to shore up the line, while hopefully also getting back Ben Ijalana at the OG spot.

1st round(7th overall pick- 6-10 record))

-Indy trades down to around the 20th pick. Teams that could be looking to move up are KC who could be looking for a franchise QB, and other teams that are looking for an impact pass rusher or OT. There will be some rated in the top 10. (With the trade, Indy acquires an extra 2nd and 2014 2nd.)

-Indy selects NT Johnathon Hankins, OSU (Im starting to like this guy more than NT Star Lotulelei, and Hankins could be had around this point in the 1st round. He has a lot of the similar traits that NT Vince Wilfork has. Hankins is big and strong, but also has good burst and decent pass rush ability. Im still not sold on Josh Chapman until he starts playing and shows me something first. Now our run defense got that much better with Hankins, not to mention he can collapse the pocket on passing downs allowing edge rushers to get to the QB with greater ease.)

2nd(via trade)- Indy trades back up into the early 2nd, giving up their 2nd, and 2014 4th.)

-Indy selects OG Chance Warmack (We get our mauler in the run game and Warmack is also very good in pass protection. I think he could last to the early 2nd, since OGs usually dont go round 1 unless they are the best prospect in a decade. I still think Joe Reitz is best suited at RT after this year since he is 6-7 and athletic, and Warmack would take his place at OG, with hopefully Ijalana manning the other guard spot or bringing in a free agent there. Our OL suddenly looks much more promising: LT Castonzo, LG Ijalana/Free Agent, C Sateele, RG Warmack, RT Reitz)

3rd- SS Bacarri Rambo (Rambo has 1st round talent, but has been suspended in college. We have taken a chance on a guy before with this new regime, and I could see us doing it again simply because we lack talent on this team. Pagano specializes in DBs, so that helps make our decision. Zbikowski can be servicable, but isnt the long term solution at SS. We now have a good secondary and great safety tandem. We just are lacking another starting CB other than Davis. Powers is more suited for the nickel spot. Maybe a free agent can be brought in.Other options here are SS Kenny Vaccaro and CB Desmond Trufant.)

4th- DE/OLB DeMontre Moore (He is an underrated pass rusher alongside Sean Porter at Texas A&M. Could serve well for us if Hughes cant cut it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free agency we can add some pieces on OL and maybe a WR. I see a couple quality guys we could add to shore up the line, while hopefully also getting back Ben Ijalana at the OG spot.

1st round(7th overall pick- 6-10 record))

-Indy trades down to around the 20th pick. Teams that could be looking to move up are KC who could be looking for a franchise QB, and other teams that are looking for an impact pass rusher or OT. There will be some rated in the top 10. (With the trade, Indy acquires an extra 2nd and 2014 2nd.)

-Indy selects NT Johnathon Hankins, OSU (Im starting to like this guy more than NT Star Lotulelei, and Hankins could be had around this point in the 1st round. He has a lot of the similar traits that NT Vince Wilfork has. Hankins is big and strong, but also has good burst and decent pass rush ability. Im still not sold on Josh Chapman until he starts playing and shows me something first. Now our run defense got that much better with Hankins, not to mention he can collapse the pocket on passing downs allowing edge rushers to get to the QB with greater ease.)

2nd(via trade)- Indy trades back up into the early 2nd, giving up their 2nd, and 2014 4th.)

-Indy selects OG Chance Warmack (We get our mauler in the run game and Warmack is also very good in pass protection. I think he could last to the early 2nd, since OGs usually dont go round 1 unless they are the best prospect in a decade. I still think Joe Reitz is best suited at RT after this year since he is 6-7 and athletic, and Warmack would take his place at OG, with hopefully Ijalana manning the other guard spot or bringing in a free agent there. Our OL suddenly looks much more promising: LT Castonzo, LG Ijalana/Free Agent, C Sateele, RG Warmack, RT Reitz)

3rd- SS Bacarri Rambo (Rambo has 1st round talent, but has been suspended in college. We have taken a chance on a guy before with this new regime, and I could see us doing it again simply because we lack talent on this team. Pagano specializes in DBs, so that helps make our decision. Zbikowski can be servicable, but isnt the long term solution at SS. We now have a good secondary and great safety tandem. We just are lacking another starting CB other than Davis. Powers is more suited for the nickel spot. Maybe a free agent can be brought in.Other options here are SS Kenny Vaccaro and CB Desmond Trufant.)

4th- DE/OLB DeMontre Moore (He is an underrated pass rusher alongside Sean Porter at Texas A&M. Could serve well for us if Hughes cant cut it.)

The first 3 have a VERY good chance of all being taken in the 1st. Also, lets see if Chapman could be our future NT before we start looking for NTs in next years draft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really.   There's a theory that Ballard wants to draft an OL high because he said it's important to protect the QB, and Richardson was hurt last year. And the counter was that Richardson's injury/s probably aren't about the level of OL protection, and drafting an OL high wouldn't address that concern.
    • I'm thinking if we can trade to 8 or 9 and draft Odunze , we should do it if the price is reasonable. The value chart shows giving up P 15 and P 46 is the perfect number. Probably won't do it and I would think 2025 2nd for a 2024 4th added to the deal would make it work . That of coarse would depend on Atlanta or Chicago wanting to move to 15 . Obviously , as we all know , it takes 2 to make a trade.
    • I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more.    but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. 
    • Glad that’s over…    if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug 
    • Putting a finality on an argument you want to have.   There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline.  I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games.  The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...