Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Joe Lefeged


Superman

Recommended Posts

I liked Mike Newton more than David Caldwell. Wasn't it Newton that made the INT and took it to the 1 or 2 yard line? I liked how zeroed in to the QB's eyes je was and how well he reacted to routes. If Joe Lefeged is another SS in the mold of Bullitt, it makes sense to invest in another pass coverage free safety like Mike Newton. I think Mike Newton makes the squad, he showed good technique and position yesterday in pass coverage and we could use some good pass coverage with our safeties.

Yeah but Caldwell is the one playing with the first unit. That matters with the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some quality guys won't make final cuts around the league. We might be able to pick up an additional safety for depth. Bethea and Bullitt have been banged up in the past, so depth at safety, especially on this team is important.

btw, anyone else notice Jordan Palmer was cut by the bengals? He might have been a nice #2.

We have a number 2, we just paid a tone of money for a number two. Then Curtis Painter came to life. We are set at QB now. Manning, Collins, and Painter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Mike Newton should get more first team looks.

I don't know, coaches seem to like what they see from Caldwell atleast till last night. I don't really have a side either way. I was just pointing out it was Caldwell who was playing with the starters (and had his name called on a lot of tackles). Normally with the Colts that tends to matter. In theory there could be room for both along with Lefegod if he's kept as a returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, coaches seem to like what they see from Caldwell atleast till last night. I don't really have a side either way. I was just pointing out it was Caldwell who was playing with the starters (and had his name called on a lot of tackles).

Didn't Caldwell miss a few, I mean, tackles? As soon as Bullitt went to the locker room, why did they not use Lefeged more instead of Caldwell? That is what leads me to believe that they are trying out Caldwell with the first team more to see what he can do, and maybe they will do the same with Mike Newton too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Caldwell miss a few, I mean, tackles? As soon as Bullitt went to the locker room, why did they not use Lefeged more instead of Caldwell? That is what leads me to believe that they are trying out Caldwell with the first team more to see what he can do, and maybe they will do the same with Mike Newton too.

Yeah, I have never said Caldwell is a lock, I am just saying based on the past where you play in terms of what groups sometimes matter more in terms of your chances of making the roster than how you play with the Colts. We saw it for years with the back up QBs poistion.

I was at the game and I just know it seemed like every play in the first half his name was called for being in on the tackle. Now some of that might have very well be caused because he didn't get over to cover his guy fast enough to stop the pass. Bullitt was already out of the game when they took him to the lockerroom. They had already taken the first unit out so you can't read too much into that.

I have no idea why they didn't use Lefegod more than Caldwell. I would guess they lke Caldwell more. I kept Lefegod on the roster for his kick return skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am planning on watching the game again. I do remember a "miss" or two by Caldwell.

However, i remember a few Sanders-like hits. He seems to bring the wood at the point of contact. Sanders had it, Session had it (at times). Hopefully, Sims will have it and Angerer shows signs of that "enforcer-style" play. Brackett almost seems to have it too. We need a couple of those on Defense. The cover-2 is great for setting up big hits.

If our DL can get some pressure, I'm starting to like the potential of this D.

And btw, at least for the moment, the Harris, Sims, and Anderson pick-ups look genius.

Now if we can maybe pick-up an improvement at Safety , CB, and/or OL, after cuts, we might just have something.

My concerns (other than Peyton) at the moment are:

1. Collie, Gonzo, White (we looked so deep at WR (like last year at this time) and now suddenly we have issues. Wayne,Garcon, Taj, etc just isn't the same.)

2. OL (they are gonna be protecting a somewhat fragile "meal-ticket". I hope they can get it together FAST. Or Manning could be back on sidelines.

2. Eldridge (anyone know how he's doing? It would be nice to have a helthy blocking TE on the roster for once)

3. CB and Safety depth. (It might already be here)

4. Special Teams (against GB in pre-season or Super Bowl, we just don't seem prepared for "anything")

5. Overall coaching (see above description)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I have never said Caldwell is a lock, I am just saying based on the past where you play in terms of what groups sometimes matter more in terms of your chances of making the roster than how you play with the Colts. We saw it for years with the back up QBs poistion.

I was at the game and I just know it seemed like every play in the first half his name was called for being in on the tackle. Now some of that might have very well be caused because he didn't get over to cover his guy fast enough to stop the pass. Bullitt was already out of the game when they took him to the lockerroom. They had already taken the first unit out so you can't read too much into that.

I have no idea why they didn't use Lefegod more than Caldwell. I would guess they lke Caldwell more. I kept Lefegod on the roster for his kick return skills.

I can recall lefeged starting when bethea got injured in the skins game, but he's a SS so he's actually the back up for bullit and i like it that way cause when bullit left he came in, caldwell is a good backup for bethea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am planning on watching the game again. I do remember a "miss" or two by Caldwell.

However, i remember a few Sanders-like hits. He seems to bring the wood at the point of contact. Sanders had it, Session had it (at times). Hopefully, Sims will have it and Angerer shows signs of that "enforcer-style" play. Brackett almost seems to have it too. We need a couple of those on Defense. The cover-2 is great for setting up big hits.

If our DL can get some pressure, I'm starting to like the potential of this D.

And btw, at least for the moment, the Harris, Sims, and Anderson pick-ups look genius.

Now if we can maybe pick-up an improvement at Safety , CB, and/or OL, after cuts, we might just have something.

My concerns (other than Peyton) at the moment are:

1. Collie, Gonzo, White (we looked so deep at WR (like last year at this time) and now suddenly we have issues. Wayne,Garcon, Taj, etc just isn't the same.)

2. OL (they are gonna be protecting a somewhat fragile "meal-ticket". I hope they can get it together FAST. Or Manning could be back on sidelines.

2. Eldridge (anyone know how he's doing? It would be nice to have a helthy blocking TE on the roster for once)

3. CB and Safety depth. (It might already be here)

4. Special Teams (against GB in pre-season or Super Bowl, we just don't seem prepared for "anything")

5. Overall coaching (see above description)

brody played he did pretty well, best blocking TE the colts have had in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do I already like the rookies Carter, Lefeged, Nevis, A.C more than 50% of the other guys? I'm sure they will tick me off in the regular season a bit but these guys are going to set the a Colts up for the next few years..

Because they're bright, new shiny toys... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one of the posters said, "Pro-Bowl" in a couple years? Seriously? He's looked just OK in the pre-season, let him go against the "real-deal" and let's see how he does. I've reviewed the games multiple times and I just don't see it.

lol no offense mate but your reviews dont really mean much unless your name is mike mayock or something... but i do agree i dont see him being a pro bowl guy yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is exactly what he was brought here to do. You almost have to look at him as an o-lineman if you aren't talking about him it probably means he's doing a good job.

Yea, i did like to see him out there catching passes as well. He's not fast but i hope they develop his catching skills as well in a game, its definitely nice to see him back on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To use an off season surgery as an excuse is bollocks....    He needs to step up his game and start performing. In many ways he honestly looks like one of the 5 worst QB´s in the league and again, to use a shoulder surgery as an excuse is just pure bollocks.   There simply is no development in his game, and his huge upside is what? tell me?    I don´t think one second that we will ever come close to winning anything with him as our QB.   and to make things worse read this: https://www.espn.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2176813
    • And yet, PFF didn't grade him all that high last year.  My response to this is that the scheme is designed for the MLB and the SS to make most of the tackles.  And they do. But last year, Franklin allowed a 77% completion rate with 10.2 yards per completion, and 7.9 yards per target.  In summary, he makes a lot of tackles by scheme, but he also allows a lot of completions. I don't think of him a Great.  Or even Good.  He's Fair.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FranZa00.htm  
    • Probably still won’t shut people up lol. But that is interesting  We are 3 games in after a shoulder surgery. What are you talking about.
    • Every bottom feeder team has a good player or two. Are the colts a bottom feeder? At times they play like it.    the “forum GMs” as you call them, don’t dislike when a player does well. They just hate when the team sucks. There’s nothing wrong with that. And no one here says some of the Colts players aren’t good players.    the Colts stunk it up pretty bad in the first two weeks, lost game one again a stat that we have held for over a decade. In must win games, the colts perform exceptionally awful with a mind boggling level of consistency under this regime.    the good players that the Colts have tend to also not show up in those games and make any game changing plays.    ok so Franklin can tackle. So what? Yeah the forum GMs are shaking with rage because of that!   
    • The huge difference is that you could see the progress in peytons game and how he always learned and keept going. and in year two, he really took off and started to show why we picked him.   With AR, things just getting worse, game after game... I wouldn't mind if we traded him for some picks next season.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 22,114

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,921

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Reboot

      Reboot 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,472

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,251

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 216

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThorstenDenmark

      ThorstenDenmark 343

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...