Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

jvan1973

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    31,972

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    100

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jvan1973

  1. jvan1973
    If they planned on cutting him, he would have been cut already
  2. jvan1973
    Pittman has produced with a different qb every year of his career. I think a lot of folks here sell him short. I think the dude has more than we know
  3. jvan1973
    Yes, that is true. But until he signs the tag he is in no man's land. He can't be traded until he signs the tag. Either way the Colts are in control
  4. jvan1973
    Ok so Edelman was a number 1 WR then?
  5. jvan1973
    Technically. If the tag is used, the Colts are entitled to 2 first round picks if an offer is made to Pittman and the Colts refuse to match. Zero disinformation. The Colts could reciend the tag and then trade him, but that isn't what we're talking about. The non exclusive tag, if used is exactly as presented
  6. jvan1973
    The 2016 Pats didn't have a dominant pass catcher. Unless we are calling Edelman a dominant pass catcher
  7. jvan1973
    There is more than one way to skin a cat. I've never looked into the validity of that statement
  8. jvan1973
    The 2018 eagles .
  9. jvan1973
    Ruggs is in prison.
  10. jvan1973
    Pitt wanted to test the market as has been brought up many times. Ballard can't make him sign. He was always going to get 20+ million
  11. jvan1973
    If they had no plans to get a return for his skills they would have used the transition tag. They used the non exclusive tag because they see him as a big asset. He either plays here next year or the Colts get some good picks in return.
  12. jvan1973
    No, that's not accurate.
  13. jvan1973
    The Chiefs aren't giving up 2 firsts Not really. The Colts hold the cards
  14. jvan1973
    Exclusive is almost always used on QBs. I can't remember the last time a non qb got an Exclusive tag
  15. jvan1973
    They could, but if they do trade him they will get a good amount
  16. jvan1973
    What I mean is, Ridley won't be cheaper than Pittman
  17. jvan1973
    That could happen. I highly doubt it though unless the deal is too good to pass up
  18. jvan1973
    I like Pitt a ton, but yes, give me 2 firsts all day Ridley is going to get big money.
  19. jvan1973
    Pittman has said he wanted to test the market. You can't sign a player that won't sign.
  20. jvan1973
    No, it's 2 firsts round picks if the Colts decided not to match
  21. jvan1973
    How is it a mistake?
  22. jvan1973
  23. jvan1973
  24. jvan1973
    Why does it matter when?
  25. jvan1973
    I think if they were going to cut him, they would have done it by now. He should be fined for "maybe".
×
×
  • Create New...