Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

BlueShoe

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,177
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    16

Posts posted by BlueShoe

  1. A lot of folks on this board were with me on the Herbert express. I get the Buckner deal, which we later pulled off. It made sense. But wow! How different would the Colts have been over the past few years, had we moved up and taken Herbert?

     

    It took me forever to dig this thread back up. A lot of folks hit on Herbert too. I only remembered it being a few, but there were many with me on this. Some excellent back and forth’s in this old thread. 

    • Like 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

    Look back. Frank's offense put up some really good stats the last 5 years with average talent.


    Average talent?

     

    You mean top tier offensive linemen, and a top 3 running back? He put too much pressure on that offensive line. Only helped them with running backs picking up free rushers.

     

    Frank’s playbook got stale. He was trying to run the old Marchibroda K-Gun. And didn’t evolve it to fit the team personnel. Frank and Chris Ballard were definitely not on the same page with building the team. We saw the fallout of it this season. 
     

    This offensive personnel is built for smashmouth football. 
     

    It’s time for a total rebuild. 

  3. 1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

    Maybe the passing designs are developed due to the talent at the receiver positions??


    I don’t see it that way. We are still using Frank’s playbook. Maybe with some minor tweaks and bigger sets. It’s near impossible to create a new playbook midseason. Frank got too cute… Put too much on the 5 offensive linemen. Didn’t give them any help. Saturday started to max protect, and then JT started going off. 

  4. 5 hours ago, NFLfan said:

     

    Interestingly enough, so far, only one person has selected the period that includes 1984. :dunno:

     


    I did not respond to the poll. I’m guessing many folks didn’t. My guess is the results would paint a different story if 1984 was an isolated option. 
     

    It would make even more sense, if the poll was the Baltimore years, then isolated to 1984, then 85 to pre-Peyton, then the Peyton years, then the Luck years, then post Luck. That’s a poll I would like to see the results for. 

  5. 1 minute ago, chickenMan said:

    I’m fine with the playcalling. I didn’t say anything about the playcalling, I said the sack and then Pittman’s hold were bad

     

    The refs are calling this very tight... It is that kind of game... 

     

    Our caching staff is doing a great job... They are putting our team in position to win this game. 

     

    It might seem conservatives to some folks, but this is the way it goes sometimes... Our coaching staff has correctly read the temperature of the room, and we are out coaching the Eagles. 

     

    The holding calls suck. No one is getting away with anything out there today. 

    • Like 2
  6. 1 minute ago, chickenMan said:

    Really bad offensive possession. The OL and Pittman’s hold really screwed that up

     

    1 minute ago, Derakynn said:

    Those were some Frank Reich playcalls right there.

     

    1 minute ago, coltsleafs said:

    Not loving the offensive play calling today. Thank God the D is playing unreal.

     

     

    Just curious guys...

     

    What play call would you suggest on 3rd and 19?

     

    Keep in mind the Colts are up by 10 (2 scores)...

    :D

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...