Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Indy Fan

Member
  • Posts

    230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Indy Fan

  1. You can’t have enough depth and at the end of the day if the prospects become bums then it ain’t my job on the line. I just hope he grabbed some gems to make this team somewhat enjoyable to watch. Love the Nelson pick and hope he brings the nasty. Leonard should be a great WILL and hopefully Smith locks down the RT spot. Interesting to see if they bring CJ in to partner with Mack.

  2. Just now, nburgmei said:

    Most of which you will find leading directly through the oline to our franchise QB.

    Castonzo, Nelson, and Kelly we’ve already invested enough high end picks on the line. O and Mewhort is coming back too.  A new OC should also do wonders since Chuck was super predictable.

  3. Just look at the Giants fan forum and you'll see why I don't want him. Below is a quote from one of their members to give you an idea :D

     

    "Getting a 6th or 7th would be enough for this waste of space. Get him out of the locker room! He stinks and he doesnt care to get better. Use that pick to draft our future kicker lol. Bye Bye Ereck!"

    • Like 1
  4. We aren’t going to address all of our needs this offseason. CB set us up with the three additional second rounders and based on the rumors is looking to acquire more while still being in a great position to get one of the premium players (I’m hoping Roquan Smith is there). I believe I read somewhere that Dallas played in nickel around 75-80% of the time, therefore, there’s one less backer. There are a bunch of corners in this draft that would excel in the 2-4th round so that would address one need while saving some draft capitol. It looks like the linebackers drop off after the first so getting one in the first with a trade back would be my dream scenario. 

    • Like 1
  5. 11 minutes ago, chad72 said:

     

    Ballard wouldn't move unless the Bills blow him away with an offer. It would take their current two first round picks, a 2nd and a 3rd for him to consider the move from 6 to 12, IMO, if the precedent from the Jets trade is any indication.

     

    If the Bills balk at it, they take their chances.

    I’d personally want their 12, 2018 2nd, and 2019 1st. Gamble they are bad next year. Could always bundle a 2nd with the 12 to try and get Edmunds/Smith at 10.

  6. On 3/23/2018 at 9:08 AM, krunk said:

    Will one of you guys understand I'm not saying we shouldn't get a 3 tech?   I do think it's not likely we will get all 3 of them in this draft.    I just think the edge players have a bit more value.   Doesn't mean you miss out on the 3 tech or not target a good one if available . Trust me I see the value of the position.  

     

    I just think it's less managable if your edge players are bad versus if you have a good 3 tech and bad pass rushers. Ideally you would like to have strong play from all 3 if you can.   The whole piece is important, but I think the edge players have a bit  more value.

    We both understand your point, however, you initially downplayed the 3 tech spot references a defense with the likes of two HOFs. I also believe we can get after the QB just as effectively with Sheard on one side and a great 3 tech. You put the emphasis on 2 edge first then tackles and I’d say it’s 1 edge, 3 tech, other edge in that order. Pretty simple just a little difference in our philosophy. I also believe that Landry will have tremendous value as an end in a 4-3 and can be obtained outside the top 10.

×
×
  • Create New...