NFLfan

Are you serious? I would take Hopkins and Henry over many in the league.

Only Homer is your Bestie. When it comes to the Colts, Homer says: Do you agree or disagree?

NFL+ is laggy for me.

Thanks for putting it up. I'm so tired. I went to eat at an Indian restaurant and forgot there is a game tonight. Lol. Going home now. Enjoy the game!

Please quit writing "Jvan". You have written that at least three times. It looks like baiting. Just stop. Thanks.

I did ask. You wrote that if a player makes a point against that of a non-player, the person who has played the game is right. So, I replied what if two players disagree. In other words, what if a player agrees with the non-player and another player does not? Using your argument (that the player is always right), who is right? You replied the one with more acumen. How do you determine that? It is a cop out. The person who has not played may have "more acumen" and that destroys your argument. You're making a mockery out of this. I won't continue to engage. Thanks.

Nice way not to answer the question.

I thought the same. Wasn't that standard procedure by the NFL? I don't see why the owner or anyone should be fined for reporting that the league has acknowledged that bad calls were made against the Colts at the end of the game.

No one said it was not a bad call. I think what some are saying is that just because there are bad calls and teams are robbed of victories as a result of those calls, that does not mean that the game is rigged, fixed, or that the refs deliberately wanted one team to win. I bet you none of those players that you mentioned said that the refs were trying to give the game to the Browns. If one of them did, I stand corrected. Saying the Colts got robbed or bamboozled is not the same as saying the refs purposely made these calls so that the Colts would lose. Do you see the difference?

So, what if some players see something one way and others see the same situation a different way, which players will you believe? Which players are more credible to you? Why aren't all coaches and people involved in sports all former players of the sport? "Surely the former player should know more than those who have not played?" Is that what you are trying to convey? I recalled years ago some players who were criticized would fire back by saying that the person giving an opinion "did not even play the game", intimating that someone who did not play the game is not fit to criticize someone who did. I think most people would disagree with that statement. JMO.

@2006Coltsbestever You may get your wish: On3.com: Will Levis will likely make NFL debut vs. Atlanta Falcons. https://www.on3.com/teams/kentucky-wildcats/news/quarterback-will-levis-nfl-debut-tennessee-titans-vs-atlanta-falcons/

It was a good game..

That does not make sense. Someone mentioned karma and Superman asked why the karma argument does not also apply to the Colts. That is a legitimate question.

This is one of the best games that Cousins has had. He played very well. This was a good all around team win. The OL played well. The defense played pretty well. We sustained drives. My kind of football.

Warner looks hurt. SF needs him.

Cousins has played very well today.

49ers have a player called Greenlaw? I thought the announcer was saying Kinlaw.

Lions against the Raiders next week. Go Lions. Not a fan of McD.

Vikes need a long TD drive that uses up a lot of time.

This has been a pretty well played game. I don't have many complaints. Who is this Jennings guy for the 49ers? He is a good player.

The Steelers eliminated me from the Survival Pool. I had picked the Rams. There were so many upsets this week.

The Vikings offense looks good today.

It was a nice drive. We need more like that.

@VikingsFanInChennai are you watching. Kirk with the INT after Mattison had a long run (17+ yards).

Skol.