Jump to content

NFL General

If it's NFL and it's NOT COLTS, it goes here

9,567 topics in this forum

    • 808 replies
    • 13,070 views
  1. Link to the Board Rules

    • 0 replies
    • 10,368 views
    • 3 replies
    • 159 views
    • 6 replies
    • 238 views
    • 3 replies
    • 199 views
    • 5 replies
    • 111 views
    • 36 replies
    • 710 views
    • 4 replies
    • 211 views
    • 5 replies
    • 252 views
    • 2 replies
    • 157 views
    • 0 replies
    • 103 views
    • 23 replies
    • 355 views
    • 9 replies
    • 224 views
  2. Bart Starr

    • 7 replies
    • 221 views
    • 2 replies
    • 302 views
    • 38 replies
    • 1,037 views
    • 26 replies
    • 825 views
    • 14 replies
    • 454 views
    • 12 replies
    • 543 views
    • 28 replies
    • 533 views
    • 106 replies
    • 2,046 views
    • 12 replies
    • 406 views
    • 14 replies
    • 473 views
    • 25 replies
    • 892 views
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

  • SEASON TICKETS

    2019 Season Tickets On Sale Now! Visit Colts.com to learn more.
  • Posts

    • I had us 9-7 just based on guessing/hoping/predicting Luck would be healthy and play great. I was right but a lucky guess, I guess  . I thought that would get us a 6th seed. We won 10 games which got us in.
    • For the first time in a while, I am impressed with the Colts development of players. If this current trend continues, a lot of opinions will change. 
    • I had us going 10-6 and winning the AFC South. I knew with Luck back we'd be at minimum .500, and I thought by adding Nelson, Ebron, and Cain, our O would be pretty decent, and enough to take the South. We were 10-6, but didn't win the South.  I wasn't counting on our D being as good, so I guess they overachieved. Honestly I'm still not sold on our D. This year will be a much bigger test.
    • I say overachieved because of what you posted here, most everyone had us with a loosing record but still liked where we were heading. I feel we overachieved and we just hit a nice stride 6 game on. That KC game was just a poorly played/game planned game. Ty broken too was a huge factor. 
    • It's interesting - and indeed subjective -, because, IMO the Eagles are indeed the #1 roster at the moment. And it's not even close. The depth of that roster is crazy. If Wentz stays healthy, they are the heavy favourites of the NFC.   (They will pay the price for putting this deep roster together though. In 1, max 2 years that Eagles will be a very different team. A very-very different team.)   Regarding the Colts, the #10 is fair imo. As of june 2019. Which can change very-very quickly. Last year, practically this very same roster - except Houston and Funches and the new rookies - was at the rock bottom of the leauge according to some "experts". I did not agree with them of course, but I had a hard time to put them into the top15. They were rather around #20 on my list. What made them to rise to #10 in one year was mostly the development of their own players. The Nelsons, the Leonards, the Hineses, the Ebrons, the Autrys, etc. Many-many players become better players in one year, than they were before, thus elevating the whole roster.   The good news is, that this Colts roster is still full of self-imrovement potential. Turay, Lewis, Cain, Hooker, Alie-Cox and so on and so on, there's a ton of young players who can still improve. The more they are, the better the chance the team will improve overall.   So, It's not delusional thinking - hoping -, that in june 2020, we - and most experts - will talk about the Colts roster - mostly this current roster, without any major outside addition - and say it's a top5 unit in the NFL.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...