Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

NFL General

If it's NFL and it's NOT COLTS, it goes here

9,598 topics in this forum

    • 809 replies
    • 13,991 views
  1. Link to the Board Rules

    • 0 replies
    • 10,629 views
    • 3,080 replies
    • 72,988 views
    • 2,764 replies
    • 63,781 views
    • 2,397 replies
    • 56,112 views
    • 2,077 replies
    • 72,353 views
    • 1,588 replies
    • 35,392 views
    • 1,379 replies
    • 48,339 views
    • 1,348 replies
    • 36,259 views
    • 1,226 replies
    • 22,532 views
    • 1,218 replies
    • 21,055 views
    • 1,204 replies
    • 26,329 views
    • 1,119 replies
    • 25,422 views
    • 1,092 replies
    • 46,390 views
    • 1,046 replies
    • 17,181 views
    • 1,035 replies
    • 27,282 views
    • 882 replies
    • 18,283 views
    • 861 replies
    • 8,756 views
    • 838 replies
    • 15,562 views
    • 755 replies
    • 10,345 views
    • 752 replies
    • 17,536 views
    • 722 replies
    • 18,619 views
    • 709 replies
    • 12,965 views
    • 662 replies
    • 15,748 views
    • 659 replies
    • 17,897 views
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • SEASON TICKETS

    2019 Season Tickets On Sale Now! Visit Colts.com to learn more.
  • Posts

    • Good....   They have no one to blame but themselves.... because Antonio Brown is a head case the likes of which we haven’t seen since Terrell Owens.... and they knew it.   Talk about high maintenance? He makes the space shuttle look like a paper airplane.
    • If we keep 6, and a 3rd X, he might be a bit better WR than Pascal, but the overall net/net would be negligible.   Inman would not be #3 this year. He might be the 3rd X if we kept 3 Xs, but at best he'd be 5th or 6th. Inman was #2 or #3 last year because we had a cluster at X. The Pats don't even have high quality depth, and Inman struggled there. Don't get me wrong, I love Inman for his contribution last year, but he's not a true #2 or #3.    At the beginning of the year, I'd bet you're likely going to see  1. TY 2. Funch 3. Rogers 4. Cain 5. Campbell   By the end of the year, I'd bet you're likely going to see 1. TY 2. Cain 3a. Campbell 3b. Funch 5. Rogers   Funch will start out as primary X, but you're going to see Funch play more and more slot as the year goes along. We're likely going to see Cain and Funch on the field at the same time. Roger's snaps will decrease as Funch slides to slot more often and as Campbell matures.   I wouldn't mind Inman over Pascal at #6 (if we keep 6), but overall you're only getting a little bit better/mature 3rd X, and you'd be cutting your experienced KR.   I don't expect Rogers to be here next year, but he's a lock IMO at this point. He's the only experienced slot in our system, and with Campbell missing so much, it's getting more and more unrealistic to think he won't be here to start as slot. He's also the only guy that has experience at Z (now that Fountain is gone) and has backed up TY. Ideally you also want you're 4th-6th WR to be the one taking PRs.   I hope they keep in contact with Inman, and even bring him to camp in case we need help this year due to injuries. It's pretty unlikely he makes the 53 though.
    • Mark Davis wont fire Jon Gruden anytime within the next few years after giving him a 10 year, $100 million contract. (Yes, coaches contracts are almost always fully guaranteed).
    • Walker was signed in 2017 as a UDFA. The Colts can have up to 4 players with 2 years experience on the PS. The remaining 6 can only have one or less years of experience IIRC.
    • If he can lay off all banned substances... who knows, maybe not too far out there.   He will be tested a boatload though.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...