Jump to content

NFL General

If it's NFL and it's NOT COLTS, it goes here

9,531 topics in this forum

    • 1,119 replies
    • 23,427 views
  1. Link to the Board Rules

    • 0 replies
    • 10,027 views
    • 3,080 replies
    • 72,241 views
    • 2,764 replies
    • 63,112 views
    • 2,397 replies
    • 55,490 views
    • 2,077 replies
    • 71,769 views
    • 1,588 replies
    • 34,822 views
    • 1,379 replies
    • 46,405 views
    • 1,348 replies
    • 35,657 views
    • 1,226 replies
    • 21,974 views
    • 1,218 replies
    • 20,546 views
    • 1,204 replies
    • 25,762 views
    • 1,092 replies
    • 45,377 views
    • 1,046 replies
    • 15,999 views
    • 1,035 replies
    • 26,773 views
    • 882 replies
    • 17,868 views
    • 861 replies
    • 8,143 views
    • 838 replies
    • 14,167 views
    • 755 replies
    • 9,255 views
    • 752 replies
    • 17,160 views
    • 722 replies
    • 18,166 views
    • 709 replies
    • 12,586 views
    • 662 replies
    • 15,427 views
    • 659 replies
    • 17,444 views
    • 644 replies
    • 19,161 views
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • SEASON TICKETS

    2019 Season Tickets On Sale Now! Visit Colts.com to learn more.
  • Posts

    • Well....   Fitzpatrick appears to be the starter,  so, yes,  Miami would seem to be tanking....   And Keenan is no longer the starter in Denver.    Joe Flacco is with Keenan staying as the back-up.   Could Miami have some interest?     Sure.   But what would they offer?    My guess is not as much as some might think.....  
    • I think the odds are low. Seems like most of the teams in a QB need will either draft one or tank for Tua/Herbert/Fromm(Miami). There is an outside shot, but I wouldn't call it likely by any stretch of the imagination. 
    • You'd argue with mud puddle.   On the black out policy.... the NFL suspended the black out policy in 2015. Even when it was in place, you only had to sell out 85%   And... if you don't understand the correlation between attendance, ticket demand, and overall revenue, then you have other issues you may need to get checked out.   Season ticket renewals declined in the 16, 17, and 18 seasons (along with attendance). That was bad no matter how you spin it. Pump all the sunshine you want, but it was bad. The Colts even upped their food and beverage credits to sell tickets. They didn't pick up till we went on the second half winning streak last year.   Here's an article on the turnaround, but talks about the declines in previous years.   https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2019/01/17/indianapolis-colts-season-ticket-sales-expected-to-increase-in-2019/2591196002/
    • In terms of grading, I'll use NFL.com's draft ratings. Funchess was a 5.64 during the 2016 draft (6.0 is assumed a "Starter"). Rogers wasn't even rated or included in most big boards at all (top 300 or 400).    Rogers was an undrafted free agent, so saying someone ranks under Rogers is a bit of a head scratcher. There are 16 WRs rated higher than Funchess's 5.64 in this year's draft. Boykin is one of them. One advantage to taking one of those 16, or even one a bit lower, is that you're not paying them 10M or more per year for the next XX years. Isabella for instance is rated a little below 5.64, but is RW and PFF's top rated WR. I'd have zero problem whatsoever taking him at 59. And I'd have zero problem with several of the WRs at 34. Chances are that a 6.0 WR will be available at 26 is pretty much a given, and at 34, pretty likely as well.   You can disagree with the ratings, but there will be plenty of solid WRs throughout the 2nd, and possibly into the 3rd. Short on T1 talent, but plenty of good T2 guys.
    • Attendance and ticket sales are two different things. When is the last time the Colts were blacked out?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...