NFL General
If it's NFL and it's NOT COLTS, it goes here
11,359 topics in this forum
-
- 28 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 63 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 87 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 15 replies
- 948 views
-
- 29 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 34 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 37 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 559 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 467 views
-
- 7 replies
- 546 views
-
- 74 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 612 views
-
- 9 replies
- 466 views
-
- 14 replies
- 906 views
-
- 14 replies
- 5.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 579 views
-
- 28 replies
- 795 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 14 replies
- 601 views
-
- 14 replies
- 11.2k views
-
- 15 replies
- 836 views
-
- 6 replies
- 659 views
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
2024 Season Tickets
-
Posts
-
Not really. There's a theory that Ballard wants to draft an OL high because he said it's important to protect the QB, and Richardson was hurt last year. And the counter was that Richardson's injury/s probably aren't about the level of OL protection, and drafting an OL high wouldn't address that concern. -
I'm thinking if we can trade to 8 or 9 and draft Odunze , we should do it if the price is reasonable. The value chart shows giving up P 15 and P 46 is the perfect number. Probably won't do it and I would think 2025 2nd for a 2024 4th added to the deal would make it work . That of coarse would depend on Atlanta or Chicago wanting to move to 15 . Obviously , as we all know , it takes 2 to make a trade. -
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
I can too. And that will tell us everything we need to know about how the view him. It will tell us their feelings on the tight end room, and what direction they pick from there will tell us even more. but if they take him at 15, we won’t know much about what might have happened, as they will be landing someone they had rated highly and fell to them. -
By ColtStrong2013 · Posted
Glad that’s over… if I wanted to argue about it, I would have responded far more in depth than pointing out how you were attempting to gaslight me. I did not. Meaning I was ending my part of whatever the argument was. You “putting a finality to it” and then listing bullet points tells me it was the argument you wanted all along, which makes sense why you brought Grigson up in the first place. Bait, hook, gaslight. Almost got me buddy. You are a funny guy, Doug -
Putting a finality on an argument you want to have. There is a theory that Ballard won't draft a OL high because ARs injuries were not caused by a poor oline. I felt it important to note that since Luck's major injuries were also not caused by his oline, Ballard could still want to improve it like he did in 2018 simply because AR is The Franchise. And its important to point that out because there has been a running (false) narrative for about 9 years that Luck's oline was the (main) reason for his injuries that kept him out of games. The (false) narrative is based upon, IMO, a detest of Grigson, and not reality about the facts (or strong rumors) behind the kidney laceration and snowboarding shoulder. Therefore, mentioning Grigson and the (false) narrative was germain to the point about Ballard possibly drafting Oline high this draft to protect AR. Mentioning Grigson shouldn't trigger a CB vs RG discussion, unless people reading it are gaslighted by their own reading lens.
-
-
Topics
-
