Colts Football
All things Colts football
32,310 topics in this forum
-
- 52 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 70 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 131 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 87 replies
- 8.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 38 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 8 replies
- 835 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1k views
-
- 56 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 84 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 35 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 800 views
-
- 27 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 836 views
-
- 48 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 17 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1k views
-
Recently Browsing 5 members
-
2024 Season Tickets
-
Posts
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
if Bowers is there at #15 and he is by far the best player there, then you take him I don't a see corner of value at #15 if Mitchel is gone. If the Colts were to take a guy like Mitchell with their 1st pick whether it be bye trade up and/or at #15, it would suggest to me there is a shift in defensive philosophy as he is a man corner. That would be exciting for me. To me if the Colts are to go defense with their 1st pick, I really hope they are ready to get that guy if it means trading up. I would believe that the Colts may have one corner and maybe 3 DE's that are worthy of a top 15 pick. The rest of the corners are mostly zone corners and you can get those later in the draft. Turner, Verse and Latu. Latu is intriguing as he could slide because of medical but some say he is worthy of a top 6 pick. He reminds me of Sweat when the Colts bypassed him because of the medical and picked Sin in the 2nd. -
By FalseStart · Posted
And with the 15th Pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts select... -
There are levels to the TE debate. One one hand, the market value of the position hurts the value of an early R1 TE. With the rookie wage scale, they come into the NFL already making good money for the position, so there's no real surplus value. On the other hand, the TEs that you would want to build around don't make it to FA, so the market value doesn't matter as much. So getting one when you can is important. But then you also see that there are great TEs taken past R1 as well. Plus, then you have to consider the scheme. Committing a big contract to a RB seems to suggest that this team will be running the ball quite often. How often would they take advantage of Bowers? We saw this unfold in ATL. They spent early R1 draft capital on a TE and a WR...and then ran the ball all the time. So those picks have largely not been maximized. It seems like the Bowers debate is fully dependent on him falling to #15. Then we can see how he ranks over other prospects available. -
By Yoshinator · Posted
I literally think the only player in this class Ballard would give up a future 1st for would be Marvin Harrison Jr, and that's if Irsay told him to do so. -
I don't see any scenario where they are giving up next year's R1 pick. It would be an opportunistic trade up that they can likely spread over this draft and next draft. The MOST we have seen Ballard additionally give up in trade-ups is a mid-late R5 pick. Tyquan, JT, Cross. For him to give up even a Day 2 pick would be out of character. So it would have to be quite the opportunity.
-
-
Topics
-
.jpg.03c76055d967f51b813e290416ac9bfa.thumb.jpg.b1d64d49e1863163f4eefe42ad172348.jpg)