Colts Football
All things Colts football
32,314 topics in this forum
-
- 38 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 30 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 64 replies
- 4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 10 replies
- 725 views
-
- 2 replies
- 959 views
-
- 30 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 83 replies
- 5k views
-
- 72 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 714 views
-
- 23 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 626 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 23 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 719 views
-
- 15 replies
- 752 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 12 replies
- 917 views
-
- 3 replies
- 732 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 735 views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 73 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 82 replies
- 5.4k views
-
Recently Browsing 5 members
-
2024 Season Tickets
-
Posts
-
Ballard uses the trade backs as his way of filling out the depth if you don't see him add many people then you can almost bank on a trade back or two to fill roster holes -
I've been telling y'all by things he has said previously and the way he handled FA what we would probably do.
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
I think people know I favor a DE or corner at 15. However, how would people feel if they went Murphy? I know people see it as a strength with Buckner and Stewart. Buckner has just resigned, however he will be 31. Stewart is primarily a run first DT. By drafting Murphy, u could be getting your 3 tech of the future, and they are hard to get. If Richardon becomes a star, it might be their only chance to swing this early in the draft for a position u covet. U could also have a great interior pass rush and therefore affecting the opposing teams Oline and in essence making the D as a whole better. We all know Ballard loves the 3tech and showed that by trading a 1st for Buckner. Could be an interesting wrinkle to the draft. -
By coltsfanej · Posted
I like the bowers pick. Would not have taken kichens. Pearsall or Tampa would have been my pick more than likely. -
-
-
Topics
-
